Lack Of Title Documents In Lal Dora Land Does Not Relieve Plaintiff From Proving Continuous Possession To Claim Ownership: Delhi High Court Unauthorized Video Recording Of Court Proceedings Without Prior Permission Amounts To Contempt Of Court: Bombay High Court Finality Of Litigation | State Cannot Re-Litigate Settled Decrees By Alleging Collusion After Affirmation Up To Supreme Court: Allahabad High Court SC/ST Act | Court Cannot Determine Conversion Status To Quash FIR Before Completion Of Investigation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Absence Of Manufacturing Activity And Dilapidated Condition Of Premises Constitute Valid Grounds For Closure: Bombay High Court Non-Disclosure Of Existing Insurance Policies In Proposal Form Entitles Insurer To Repudiate Claim: Calcutta High Court Will Interpretation | Bequest Of "Above Said Property" Includes Entire Estate, Not Just Descriptive Portions Mentioned Therein: Delhi High Court Limitation Act | Court Can Balance Equities By Denying Interest For Delay Period In Land Acquisition Appeals: Gujarat High Court Article 21 Constitution Of India | Personal Liberty Of Detenue Cannot Be Curtailed Without Authority Of Law Post-Acquittal: Jharkhand High Court Order 8 Rule 1A CPC | Trial Court Should Not Reject Documents Merely For Delay If Foundation Is Laid In Pleadings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order XXII CPC Applies To SCC Suits; Rule 25 Of U.P. Urban Buildings Rules Does Not Govern Substitution Where Act Is Inapplicable: Allahabad High Court Recruitment Authorities Cannot Insist On Impossible Experience Criteria: Karnataka High Court Rules Against Rejection Of Motor Vehicle Inspector Candidates Order 38 Rule 8 CPC | Claim Petition Cannot Be Allowed Ex-Parte Without Adjudication On Merits: Kerala High Court Succession Certificate Under Section 372 Indian Succession Act Cannot Be Granted When Title Is Subject To Intricate Questions Of Fact And Law: Madras High Court SARFAESI Act | District Magistrate Cannot Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower And Secured Creditor While Assisting Possession: Madhya Pradesh High Court Termination Based On Caste Status Without Cancellation Of Original Certificate Is Legally Unsustainable: Orissa High Court Section 13 Punjab Village Common Lands Act | Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted In Private Injunction Suits Where Title Against Panchayat Is Not Sought: High Court Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act  | Equal Opportunity Policy Of Employer Is Mandatory; Routine Transfer Policy Must Yield To Special Provisions For Caregivers: Rajasthan High Court Compensation Must Be Just, Not A Pittance: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Award In Motor Accident Claim Registration Act | Sub-Registrar Has No Power To Adjudicate Title Or Refuse Registration Based On Unauthorized Layouts: Telangana High Court Section 50 NDPS Act | Failure To Individually Communicate Right To Be Searched Before Gazetted Officer Or Magistrate Vitiates Conviction: Telangana High Court

Blindly Disregarding the evidence result in a miscarriage of justice – Patna High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision High Court handed down a verdict that reaffirms the importance of credible eyewitness testimony in criminal cases. The judgment, authored by Honorable Sudhir Singh, J, and Honorable Chandra Prakash Singh, J, centered on murder and attempted murder charges against multiple appellants.

The High Court's verdict, while emphasizing the critical role of eyewitness accounts, addressed three pivotal questions:

1. Place of Occurrence Established Beyond Doubt:

The judgment stated, "Considering the facts of this case... there remains no doubt as regards to the place of occurrence." This observation underlined the significance of eyewitnesses who consistently testified about the location of the incident, corroborated by physical evidence found at the scene.

2. Manner of Occurrence Corroborated by Evidence:

The verdict continued, "The evidence led by the above-stated eyewitnesses, one of them is an injured witness, is consistent, clinching, tallying with each other and clearly implicating the accused persons." This highlighted the importance of aligning eyewitness testimonies with medical evidence, thus effectively establishing the sequence of events.

3. Non-examination of Independent Witnesses Does Not Undermine Credibility:

The High Court's judgment noted, "Blindly disregarding the evidence, even when it comes from a witness who might have a bias or vested interest, has the potential to result in a miscarriage of justice." This underscored the importance of evaluating the credibility of witnesses on a case-by-case basis, regardless of their relationship with the parties involved.

The verdict ultimately resulted in the conviction of certain appellants while upholding the acquittal of others due to a lack of evidence establishing a shared common object. The judgment serves as a precedent that highlights the need for meticulous examination of evidence and the weight given to eyewitness testimonies in criminal trials.

Date of Decision: 1 September 2023

Rajkumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar                        

Latest Legal News