IT Act | Unpaid Excise Duty On Stock In Bonded Warehouse Can't Be Disallowed If Not Debited To P&L Account: Supreme Court Supreme Court Cannot Act As Supervisory Body Over Arbitral Execution Under Guise Of Clarification War Injury Pension Admissible For Disabilities In Specially Notified Operations Like 'Operation Rakshak' Absent Express Policy Exclusion: Supreme Court Income Tax Act | Reassessment Valid If Fresh Tangible Material Shows Escapement; Plea Of 'Change Of Opinion' Untenable Without Prior Conscious Adjudication: Supreme Court Arbitration Act | Power To Extend Arbitral Mandate Vests In S.2(1)(e) 'Court', Not High Court Under S.11; S.14 IBC No Bar On Claims By Corporate Debtor: Supreme Court Section 292BB IT Act Inapplicable Where Notice Not Issued At All; Notice Under Section 143(2) Mandatory Jurisdictional Prerequisite For Reassessment Under Section 147: Supreme Court PC Act | 'Known Sources Of Income' Means Sources Disclosed To Prosecution; IO Need Not Conduct Roving Enquiry Into Undisclosed Assets: Supreme Court Non-Furnishing Of Written Grounds Of Arrest Under Section 47 BNSS Not Blanket Ground For Bail Absent Demonstrable Prejudice: Supreme Court Cross-Suits Under Trade Marks Act: Supreme Court Exercises Section 25 CPC Discretion To Consolidate & Transfer Parallel Infringement Suits To Neutral Forum Striking Off Husband's Defence For Default In Interim Maintenance Does Not Extinguish Right To Cross-Examine Wife: Madhya Pradesh High Court Under Section 125 CrPC Proclaimed Offender Ineligible For Anticipatory Bail Unless No Prima Facie Offence Disclosed, Advocate Status Offers No Shield: Delhi High Court Under Section 84 BNSS Order 38 Rule 5 CPC | Defendant Residing Outside Jurisdiction Or Evasive Written Statement No Ground To Direct Furnishing Of Security Absent Intent To Obstruct Decree: Delhi High Court Cheque Issued By Guarantor Falls Under Section 138 NI Act; Principal Debtor’s Incarceration Does Not Extinguish Criminal Liability: Rajasthan High Court S. 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked To Circumvent Summary Scheme Under S. 25-B DRC Act By Belatedly Supplementing Leave To Defend: Delhi High Court Fresh Encroachers Lacking Title Cannot Stall Execution Of Concluded Eviction Orders Affirmed By Supreme Court: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Production Of Birth Register Without Proving Source Of Information Cannot Prove Minority Under POCSO Act: Gujarat High Court Mere Agreement To Sell Or Suit For Specific Performance Confers No Title Under Section 54 TP Act, Cannot Bar Eviction Decree Against Permissive Occupant: Gujarat High Court Regional Rural Banks Cannot Perpetuate Exploitative Temporary Engagements For Perennial Roles; Must Frame Regularisation Scheme Under Article 226: Orissa High Court Odisha Grama Panchayats Act | 15 Clear Days Notice Mandatory For No Confidence Motion; Computed From Date Of Dispatch Excluding Dispatch & Meeting Dates: Orissa High Court Order 21 Rule 97 CPC | Technical Objection That CMA Lies Instead Of Revision Cannot Defeat Merits Adjudication When Auction Purchaser Deprived Of Possession For Decades: Andhra Pradesh High Court Time-Barred Challenge To Sale Deeds & Property Substitution Affecting Third-Party Rights Impermissible Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC: Bombay High Court No Woman Can Be Compelled To Continue Pregnancy, Court Order Sufficient If Guardian Reluctant To Bear Medical Risk: Kerala High Court Permits Termination At 27 Weeks For Minor Rape Survivor Section 25(3) Contract Act Inapplicable Without Proving Due Execution; Firm Cheque Signed Solely By Retired Partner Cannot Revive Time-Barred Debt: Kerala High Court

Blindly Disregarding the evidence result in a miscarriage of justice – Patna High Court

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision High Court handed down a verdict that reaffirms the importance of credible eyewitness testimony in criminal cases. The judgment, authored by Honorable Sudhir Singh, J, and Honorable Chandra Prakash Singh, J, centered on murder and attempted murder charges against multiple appellants.

The High Court's verdict, while emphasizing the critical role of eyewitness accounts, addressed three pivotal questions:

1. Place of Occurrence Established Beyond Doubt:

The judgment stated, "Considering the facts of this case... there remains no doubt as regards to the place of occurrence." This observation underlined the significance of eyewitnesses who consistently testified about the location of the incident, corroborated by physical evidence found at the scene.

2. Manner of Occurrence Corroborated by Evidence:

The verdict continued, "The evidence led by the above-stated eyewitnesses, one of them is an injured witness, is consistent, clinching, tallying with each other and clearly implicating the accused persons." This highlighted the importance of aligning eyewitness testimonies with medical evidence, thus effectively establishing the sequence of events.

3. Non-examination of Independent Witnesses Does Not Undermine Credibility:

The High Court's judgment noted, "Blindly disregarding the evidence, even when it comes from a witness who might have a bias or vested interest, has the potential to result in a miscarriage of justice." This underscored the importance of evaluating the credibility of witnesses on a case-by-case basis, regardless of their relationship with the parties involved.

The verdict ultimately resulted in the conviction of certain appellants while upholding the acquittal of others due to a lack of evidence establishing a shared common object. The judgment serves as a precedent that highlights the need for meticulous examination of evidence and the weight given to eyewitness testimonies in criminal trials.

Date of Decision: 1 September 2023

Rajkumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar                        

Latest Legal News