'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

Blindly Disregarding the evidence result in a miscarriage of justice – Patna High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision High Court handed down a verdict that reaffirms the importance of credible eyewitness testimony in criminal cases. The judgment, authored by Honorable Sudhir Singh, J, and Honorable Chandra Prakash Singh, J, centered on murder and attempted murder charges against multiple appellants.

The High Court's verdict, while emphasizing the critical role of eyewitness accounts, addressed three pivotal questions:

1. Place of Occurrence Established Beyond Doubt:

The judgment stated, "Considering the facts of this case... there remains no doubt as regards to the place of occurrence." This observation underlined the significance of eyewitnesses who consistently testified about the location of the incident, corroborated by physical evidence found at the scene.

2. Manner of Occurrence Corroborated by Evidence:

The verdict continued, "The evidence led by the above-stated eyewitnesses, one of them is an injured witness, is consistent, clinching, tallying with each other and clearly implicating the accused persons." This highlighted the importance of aligning eyewitness testimonies with medical evidence, thus effectively establishing the sequence of events.

3. Non-examination of Independent Witnesses Does Not Undermine Credibility:

The High Court's judgment noted, "Blindly disregarding the evidence, even when it comes from a witness who might have a bias or vested interest, has the potential to result in a miscarriage of justice." This underscored the importance of evaluating the credibility of witnesses on a case-by-case basis, regardless of their relationship with the parties involved.

The verdict ultimately resulted in the conviction of certain appellants while upholding the acquittal of others due to a lack of evidence establishing a shared common object. The judgment serves as a precedent that highlights the need for meticulous examination of evidence and the weight given to eyewitness testimonies in criminal trials.

Date of Decision: 1 September 2023

Rajkumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar                        

Latest Legal News