Inability To Trace Beneficiaries Cannot Defeat Or Postpone Compensation Disbursal: Supreme Court Directs High Court Suo Motu Proceedings Disability Pension | Mere Manifestation Of Disease During Military Service Without Causal Connection Is Not Sufficient For Entitlement: Supreme Court Prevention Of Corruption Act | Mere Recovery Of Tainted Money Without Proof Of Demand Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court Appointment Contrary To Statutory Requirements And Advertisement Terms Amounts To Fraud On Public: Supreme Court IT Act | Once Settlement Commission Admits Application Under Section 245C, Assessing Officer Loses Jurisdiction To Reopen Assessment Under Section 148: Supreme Court NDPS Act | Prosecution Must Establish Unbroken Chain Of Custody For Samples, Failure To Comply With Section 52-A Renders FSL Report Inadmissible: Supreme Court Section 180 BNSS | Investigating Officers Must Adopt Transparent Practices; DGP Should Consider Making Audio-Video Recording Of Witness Statements Mandatory: Allahabad High Court Rowdy Sheet Cannot Be Opened In A Mechanical Manner Based On Mere Pendency Of Two Criminal Cases: Andhra Pradesh High Court 'Surname Protection Under Section 35 Trade Marks Act Not Restricted To Natural Persons': Bombay High Court Allows Corporate Body To Use Family Name Circumstantial Evidence | Prosecution Must Prove Connectivity Between Accused And Crime, Mere 'Last Seen' Theory Insufficient: Calcutta High Court Section 482 BNSS | Criminal Prosecution Against Company Directors Cannot Be Quashed When Investigation Reveals Active Role Beyond Mere Designation: Delhi High Court Cannot Be Permitted To Patch Up Weak Points: Karnataka High Court Dismisses Belated Order 41 Rule 27 CPC Plea Order XXI Rule 90 CPC | Burden To Prove Material Irregularity Or Fraud In Court Auction Sale Lies Upon Judgment Debtor: Kerala High Court Departmental Instructions Not Being Mandatory, Non-Compliance Does Not Vitiate Enquiry If Guilt Is Proved By Other Cogent Evidence: Delhi High Court Doctrine Of Res Gestae | Hearsay Evidence Can Be Admissible If Statement Is Spontaneous And Contemporaneous With The Occurrence: Madras High Court Relatives Cannot Be Roped Into Matrimonial Disputes On The Basis Of Omnibus Allegations: Madhya Pradesh High Court Grants Discharge Victim In Private Complaint Case Entitled To File Appeal Against Acquittal Before Sessions Court U/S 372 CrPC: Punjab & Haryana High Court Section 58 BNSS | Detention Beyond 24 Hours Without Magistrate’s Authority Vitiates Remand, Entitles Accused To Bail: Orissa High Court Section 18 Limitation Act | Acknowledgement Of Loan In Promissory Note Extends Period Of Limitation For Entire Debt: Delhi High Court Section 138 NI Act | Existence Of Defence Founded On Disputed Facts Cannot Be Ground To Scuttle Cheque Bounce Prosecution At Inception: Punjab & Haryana High Court Right To Promotion Does Not Exist Under Repealed Rules Following Policy Restructuring: Supreme Court

Blindly Disregarding the evidence result in a miscarriage of justice – Patna High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision High Court handed down a verdict that reaffirms the importance of credible eyewitness testimony in criminal cases. The judgment, authored by Honorable Sudhir Singh, J, and Honorable Chandra Prakash Singh, J, centered on murder and attempted murder charges against multiple appellants.

The High Court's verdict, while emphasizing the critical role of eyewitness accounts, addressed three pivotal questions:

1. Place of Occurrence Established Beyond Doubt:

The judgment stated, "Considering the facts of this case... there remains no doubt as regards to the place of occurrence." This observation underlined the significance of eyewitnesses who consistently testified about the location of the incident, corroborated by physical evidence found at the scene.

2. Manner of Occurrence Corroborated by Evidence:

The verdict continued, "The evidence led by the above-stated eyewitnesses, one of them is an injured witness, is consistent, clinching, tallying with each other and clearly implicating the accused persons." This highlighted the importance of aligning eyewitness testimonies with medical evidence, thus effectively establishing the sequence of events.

3. Non-examination of Independent Witnesses Does Not Undermine Credibility:

The High Court's judgment noted, "Blindly disregarding the evidence, even when it comes from a witness who might have a bias or vested interest, has the potential to result in a miscarriage of justice." This underscored the importance of evaluating the credibility of witnesses on a case-by-case basis, regardless of their relationship with the parties involved.

The verdict ultimately resulted in the conviction of certain appellants while upholding the acquittal of others due to a lack of evidence establishing a shared common object. The judgment serves as a precedent that highlights the need for meticulous examination of evidence and the weight given to eyewitness testimonies in criminal trials.

Date of Decision: 1 September 2023

Rajkumar Yadav vs The State of Bihar                        

Latest Legal News