'Beyond Reasonable Doubt’ Does Not Mean Beyond All Doubt: Madras High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Man Convicted of Murdering Mother-in-Law

On September 6, 2024, the Madras High Court delivered a significant judgment in Kasinathan v. State, upholding the conviction and life imprisonment of Kasinathan for the murder of his mother-in-law, Gowri. The court emphasized the reliability of child witness testimonies and clarified the legal interpretation of "beyond reasonable doubt" in criminal proceedings.

The case originated when Kasinathan, the accused, was living with his mother-in-law Gowri and his wife Revathi due to a dispute with his brother. Kasinathan, allegedly with a history of alcohol abuse, was said to have developed a grudge against Gowri, whom he blamed for interfering in his matrimonial life. On August 19, 2013, Kasinathan entered Gowri's house with a weapon and attacked her, resulting in her death. When Revathi tried to intervene, she was also injured.

The key legal questions revolved around the credibility of child witnesses and the validity of the dying declaration of the victim. The defense argued that the witnesses were tutored and that the dying declaration was unreliable due to procedural lapses. The court had to decide whether the evidence provided by the child witnesses, corroborated by medical and forensic evidence, was sufficient to uphold the conviction.

Child Witnesses' Testimonies: The court relied heavily on the testimonies of the accused's children, Vishnu (PW13) and Vishwa (PW14), who witnessed the incident. Despite their young age, the court found their statements credible, stating, "Evidence of a child witness is not required to be rejected per se but the court as a rule of prudence considers such evidence with closer scrutiny" (Ratansinh Dalsukhhai Nayak vs. State of Gujarat).

Dying Declaration: Although the dying declaration of Revathi had procedural issues, such as the absence of her signature at the end, the court noted that this alone did not render the entire prosecution case untrustworthy.

Forensic Corroboration: Forensic evidence showed that the blood found on the weapon and the clothes matched that of the deceased, further corroborating the children's testimonies.

The court clarified the interpretation of "beyond reasonable doubt," emphasizing that it does not mean "beyond all doubt" and criticized the tendency to acquit on insignificant grounds, citing the Supreme Court's stance in State of Punjab v. Ramdev.

The Madras High Court upheld the conviction and life imprisonment sentence, concluding that the prosecution had proven the case beyond reasonable doubt. The judgment emphasizes the weight that can be placed on child witnesses when their testimonies are consistent and corroborated by other evidence.

Date of Decision: 06.09.2024

Kasinathan v. State through The Inspector of Police Manalurpettai Police Station Villupuram District