Even 1.5 Years in Jail Doesn’t Dilute Section 37 NDPS Rigour: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail in 710 Kg Poppy Husk Case Stay of Conviction Nullifies Disqualification Under Section 8(3) RP Act: Allahabad High Court Dismisses Quo Warranto Against Rahul Gandhi Custodial Interrogation Necessary to Uncover ₹2 Crore MGNREGA Scam: Kerala High Court Rejects Anticipatory Bail for Vendors in Corruption Case Order 41 Rule 23 CPC | Trial Court Cannot Decide Title Solely on a Vacated Judgment: Himachal Pradesh High Court Strikes By Bar Associations Cannot Stall Justice: Allahabad High Court Holds Office Bearers Liable for Contempt if Revenue Suits Are Delayed Due to Boycotts To Constitute a Service PE, Services Must Be Furnished Within India Through Employees Present in India: Delhi High Court Medical Negligence | State Liable for Loss of Vision in Botched Cataract Surgeries: Gauhati High Court Awards Compensation Waiver of Right Under Section 50 NDPS is Valid Even Without Panch Signatures: Bombay High Court Agricultural Land Is 'Property' Under Hindu Women’s Right to Property Act, 1937: A.P. High Court Tenant Who Pays Rent After Verifying Landlord’s Will Cannot Dispute His Title Under Section 116 Evidence Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Dismisses Eviction Challenge by HP State Cooperative Bank Clever Drafting Cannot Override Limitation Bar: Gujarat High Court Rejects Suit for Specific Performance Once Divorce by Mutual Consent Is Final, Wife Cannot Pursue Criminal Case for Stridhan Without Reserving Right to Do So: Himachal Pradesh High Court Caste-Based Insults Must Show Intent – Mere Abuse Not Enough for Atrocities Act: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Represent to Detaining Authority Vitiates NSA Detention: Gauhati High Court Awarding Further Interest On Penal Charges Is Contrary To Fundamental Policy Of Indian Arbitration Law: Bombay High Court

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception – Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, March 2024: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Sanju alias Sahil Kumar in FIR No. 323/2023, invoking the principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception.' The FIR, registered under various sections of the IPC and the Arms Act, was scrutinized by Justice Kuldeep Tiwari in the matter of CRM-M-11537-2024.

Legal Point of Judgment: The court deliberated on the petitioner's bail application, emphasizing the cardinal legal principle favoring bail, as established in the landmark judgment of State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977).

Facts and Issues of the Case: Sanju, accused of involvement in an alleged intrusion and shooting, contested his implication, citing a lack of specific role or injury attributed to him and a compromise with the complainant. The state opposed the bail, acknowledging the completion of the investigation and pending framing of charges.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Tiwari underscored the importance of individual liberty, the right to a speedy trial, and the presumption of innocence, weighed against the gravity of the offence. The court observed that the petitioner’s clean record, the completion of the investigation, and the fact that charges were yet to be framed rendered further incarceration unproductive. The principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' guided the court's decision-making process.

Decision: The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, ordering his release on furnishing the required bail and surety bond. This decision was grounded in the totality of circumstances and legal principles governing bail, carefully balancing individual liberty and societal interest.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024.

Sanju Alias Sahil Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Others,

Latest Legal News