MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception – Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, March 2024: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Sanju alias Sahil Kumar in FIR No. 323/2023, invoking the principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception.' The FIR, registered under various sections of the IPC and the Arms Act, was scrutinized by Justice Kuldeep Tiwari in the matter of CRM-M-11537-2024.

Legal Point of Judgment: The court deliberated on the petitioner's bail application, emphasizing the cardinal legal principle favoring bail, as established in the landmark judgment of State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977).

Facts and Issues of the Case: Sanju, accused of involvement in an alleged intrusion and shooting, contested his implication, citing a lack of specific role or injury attributed to him and a compromise with the complainant. The state opposed the bail, acknowledging the completion of the investigation and pending framing of charges.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Tiwari underscored the importance of individual liberty, the right to a speedy trial, and the presumption of innocence, weighed against the gravity of the offence. The court observed that the petitioner’s clean record, the completion of the investigation, and the fact that charges were yet to be framed rendered further incarceration unproductive. The principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' guided the court's decision-making process.

Decision: The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, ordering his release on furnishing the required bail and surety bond. This decision was grounded in the totality of circumstances and legal principles governing bail, carefully balancing individual liberty and societal interest.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024.

Sanju Alias Sahil Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Others,

Similar News