Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception – Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, March 2024: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Sanju alias Sahil Kumar in FIR No. 323/2023, invoking the principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception.' The FIR, registered under various sections of the IPC and the Arms Act, was scrutinized by Justice Kuldeep Tiwari in the matter of CRM-M-11537-2024.

Legal Point of Judgment: The court deliberated on the petitioner's bail application, emphasizing the cardinal legal principle favoring bail, as established in the landmark judgment of State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977).

Facts and Issues of the Case: Sanju, accused of involvement in an alleged intrusion and shooting, contested his implication, citing a lack of specific role or injury attributed to him and a compromise with the complainant. The state opposed the bail, acknowledging the completion of the investigation and pending framing of charges.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Tiwari underscored the importance of individual liberty, the right to a speedy trial, and the presumption of innocence, weighed against the gravity of the offence. The court observed that the petitioner’s clean record, the completion of the investigation, and the fact that charges were yet to be framed rendered further incarceration unproductive. The principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' guided the court's decision-making process.

Decision: The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, ordering his release on furnishing the required bail and surety bond. This decision was grounded in the totality of circumstances and legal principles governing bail, carefully balancing individual liberty and societal interest.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024.

Sanju Alias Sahil Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Others,

Latest Legal News