CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception – Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, March 2024: In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Sanju alias Sahil Kumar in FIR No. 323/2023, invoking the principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception.' The FIR, registered under various sections of the IPC and the Arms Act, was scrutinized by Justice Kuldeep Tiwari in the matter of CRM-M-11537-2024.

Legal Point of Judgment: The court deliberated on the petitioner's bail application, emphasizing the cardinal legal principle favoring bail, as established in the landmark judgment of State of Rajasthan v. Balchand (1977).

Facts and Issues of the Case: Sanju, accused of involvement in an alleged intrusion and shooting, contested his implication, citing a lack of specific role or injury attributed to him and a compromise with the complainant. The state opposed the bail, acknowledging the completion of the investigation and pending framing of charges.

Court’s Assessment: Justice Tiwari underscored the importance of individual liberty, the right to a speedy trial, and the presumption of innocence, weighed against the gravity of the offence. The court observed that the petitioner’s clean record, the completion of the investigation, and the fact that charges were yet to be framed rendered further incarceration unproductive. The principle that 'Bail is the Rule and Jail is an Exception' guided the court's decision-making process.

Decision: The court granted regular bail to the petitioner, ordering his release on furnishing the required bail and surety bond. This decision was grounded in the totality of circumstances and legal principles governing bail, carefully balancing individual liberty and societal interest.

Date of Decision: March 15, 2024.

Sanju Alias Sahil Kumar vs. State of Punjab and Others,

Latest Legal News