Order VIII Rules 3 & 5 CPC | Silence Is Admission: State’s Failure To Specifically Deny Hiring Amounts To Acceptance: JK HC Mere Entry, Abuse Or Assault Is Not Civil Contempt – Willfulness And Dispossession Must Be Clearly Proved: Bombay High Court Magistrate Cannot Shut Eyes To Final Report After Cognizance – Supplementary Report Must Be Judicially Considered Before Framing Charges: Allahabad High Court Examination-in-Chief Alone Cannot Sustain Conviction Amid Serious Doubts: Delhi High Court Upholds Acquittal in Grievous Hurt Case Employees Cannot Pick Favourable Terms and Reject the Rest: Bombay High Court Upholds SIDBI’s Cut-Off Date for Pension to CPF Optees Cannot Reclaim Absolute Ownership After Letting Your Declaration Suit Fail: AP High Court Enforces Finality in Partition Appeal Death Due to Fat Embolism and Delayed Treatment Is Not Culpable Homicide: Orissa High Court Converts 30-Year-Old 304 Part-I Conviction to Grievous Hurt Fabricated Lease Cannot Be Sanctified by Consolidation Entry: Orissa High Court Dismisses 36-Year-Old Second Appeal Rules of the Game Were Never Changed: Delhi High Court Upholds CSIR’s Power to Prescribe Minimum Threshold in CASE-2023 Resignation Does Not Forfeit Earned Pension: Calcutta High Court Declares Company Superannuation Benefit as ‘Wages’ Under Law Fraud Vitiates Everything—Stranger Can File Independent Suit Against Compromise Decree: Bombay High Court Refuses to Reject 49-Year-Old Challenge at Threshold Mere Long Possession By One Co-Owner Does Not Destroy The Co-Ownership Right Of The Other: Madras High Court State Cannot Hide Behind An Illegal Undertaking: Punjab & Haryana High Court Questions Denial Of Retrospective Regularization

Bail in NDPS Case - “Gross Violations of Legal Procedures Under NDPS Act”- Cal. HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a landmark decision that underscores the importance of procedural integrity, the High Court at Calcutta’s Circuit Bench in Jalpaiguri has granted bail to Abdul Rakib. The court pointedly noted that there was “non-compliance of Section 42(1) and (2) of the NDPS Act,” thereby setting a precedent for strict adherence to legal procedures. [Page 5]

Abdul Rakib had been in custody since August 28, 2022, following his arrest under Sections 22©/25/28/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. The prosecution claimed that a significant quantity of Yaba tablets was recovered from a truck and implicated Rakib in the case.

However, the defense successfully argued that Rakib was neither the driver nor the owner or a co-passenger of the truck. The court further scrutinized the nature of the vehicle, stating, “Prima facie, it appears that the vehicle belongs to an individual owner, is classified as a goods service vehicle and is not meant for public use or transportation.” [Page 3]

The court’s ruling hinged on the lack of procedural compliance by the authorities. “Our view is strengthened by the fact that the NDPS Act is a special legislation entailing several statutory restrictions against grant of relief. Hence, the obligation cast on the officers must strictly be construed,” the court observed. [Page 6]

As a result, Abdul Rakib has been granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000, along with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.

This judgment serves as a critical reminder of the judiciary’s role in ensuring that legal procedures are not just a formality but a cornerstone of justice, particularly in cases involving stringent laws like the NDPS Act.

 Date of Decision: August 25, 2023

Abdul Rakib  vs The State of West Bengal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Legal News