Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Bail in NDPS Case - “Gross Violations of Legal Procedures Under NDPS Act”- Cal. HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a landmark decision that underscores the importance of procedural integrity, the High Court at Calcutta’s Circuit Bench in Jalpaiguri has granted bail to Abdul Rakib. The court pointedly noted that there was “non-compliance of Section 42(1) and (2) of the NDPS Act,” thereby setting a precedent for strict adherence to legal procedures. [Page 5]

Abdul Rakib had been in custody since August 28, 2022, following his arrest under Sections 22©/25/28/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. The prosecution claimed that a significant quantity of Yaba tablets was recovered from a truck and implicated Rakib in the case.

However, the defense successfully argued that Rakib was neither the driver nor the owner or a co-passenger of the truck. The court further scrutinized the nature of the vehicle, stating, “Prima facie, it appears that the vehicle belongs to an individual owner, is classified as a goods service vehicle and is not meant for public use or transportation.” [Page 3]

The court’s ruling hinged on the lack of procedural compliance by the authorities. “Our view is strengthened by the fact that the NDPS Act is a special legislation entailing several statutory restrictions against grant of relief. Hence, the obligation cast on the officers must strictly be construed,” the court observed. [Page 6]

As a result, Abdul Rakib has been granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000, along with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.

This judgment serves as a critical reminder of the judiciary’s role in ensuring that legal procedures are not just a formality but a cornerstone of justice, particularly in cases involving stringent laws like the NDPS Act.

 Date of Decision: August 25, 2023

Abdul Rakib  vs The State of West Bengal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Latest Legal News