Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

Bail in NDPS Case - “Gross Violations of Legal Procedures Under NDPS Act”- Cal. HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


 

In a landmark decision that underscores the importance of procedural integrity, the High Court at Calcutta’s Circuit Bench in Jalpaiguri has granted bail to Abdul Rakib. The court pointedly noted that there was “non-compliance of Section 42(1) and (2) of the NDPS Act,” thereby setting a precedent for strict adherence to legal procedures. [Page 5]

Abdul Rakib had been in custody since August 28, 2022, following his arrest under Sections 22©/25/28/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, 1985. The prosecution claimed that a significant quantity of Yaba tablets was recovered from a truck and implicated Rakib in the case.

However, the defense successfully argued that Rakib was neither the driver nor the owner or a co-passenger of the truck. The court further scrutinized the nature of the vehicle, stating, “Prima facie, it appears that the vehicle belongs to an individual owner, is classified as a goods service vehicle and is not meant for public use or transportation.” [Page 3]

The court’s ruling hinged on the lack of procedural compliance by the authorities. “Our view is strengthened by the fact that the NDPS Act is a special legislation entailing several statutory restrictions against grant of relief. Hence, the obligation cast on the officers must strictly be construed,” the court observed. [Page 6]

As a result, Abdul Rakib has been granted bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000, along with two sureties, subject to specific conditions.

This judgment serves as a critical reminder of the judiciary’s role in ensuring that legal procedures are not just a formality but a cornerstone of justice, particularly in cases involving stringent laws like the NDPS Act.

 Date of Decision: August 25, 2023

Abdul Rakib  vs The State of West Bengal

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Similar News