Absence of Videography Alone Not Sufficient For Bail When Custody is Less Than a Year: Delhi High Court Refuses Bail in Commercial Quantity Heroin Use of Permitted Synthetic Colour in Dal Masur Still Constitutes Adulteration: Punjab & Haryana High Court Uphold Conviction Penalty Must Not Result in Civil Death of Professionals: Delhi High Court Reduces Two-Year Suspension of Insolvency Professional, Citing Disproportionate Punishment Right of Cross-Examination is Statutory, Cannot Be Denied When Documents Are Exhibited Later: Chhattisgarh High Court Allows Re-Cross-Examination Compounding after Adjudication is Impermissible under FEMA: Calcutta High Court Declines Post-Adjudication Compounding Plea Tears of a Child Speak Louder Than Words: Bombay HC Confirms Life Term for Man Who Raped 4-Year-Old Alleged Dowry Death After Forced Remarriage: Allahabad High Court Finds No Evidence of Strangulation or Demand “Even If Executant Has No Title, Registrar Must Register the Document If Formalities Are Met” — Supreme Court  Declares Tamil Nadu's Rule 55A(i) Ultra Vires the Registration Act, 1908 Res Judicata Is Not Optional – It’s Public Policy: Supreme Court Slams SEBI for Passing Second Final Order in Fraud Case Against Vital Communications Ltd A Person Has Died… Insurance Company Cannot Escape Liability Without Proving Policy Violation: Supreme Court Slams High Court for Exonerating Insurer in Fatal Accident Case Calling Someone by Caste Name Is Not Enough – It Must Be Publicly Done to Attract SC/ST Act: Supreme Court Acquits All in Jharkhand Land Dispute Case Broken Promises Don’t Make Rape – Mature Adults in Long-Term Relationships Must Accept Responsibility: Supreme Court Quashes Rape Case Against NRI Man Every Broken Relationship Can’t Be Branded Rape: Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Retired Judge Accused of Sexual Exploitation on Promise of Marriage No Evidence, No Motive, Not Even Proof of Murder: Supreme Court Slams Conviction, Acquits Man Accused of Killing Wife After Two Years of Marriage You Can’t Assume Silence Is Consent: Supreme Court Sends Back ₹46 Lakh Insurance Dispute to NCDRC for Fresh Determination “Voyage Must Start and End Before Monsoon Sets In — But What If That’s Practically Impossible?” SC Rules Against Insurance Company in Shipping Dispute

Bail Granted In NDPS Case: Fabricated Evidence And Irregularities: Delhi HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, a recent judgement has underscored the paramount importance of personal liberty in the criminal justice system. The decision, delivered by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, has granted bail to an applicant facing charges under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, despite allegations of fabricated evidence and irregularities in the case.

The judgement, dated August 17, 2023, revolves around a bail application made under the NDPS Act. The applicant was charged with contraband possession and trafficking, primarily based on a disclosure statement of a co-accused. The court meticulously analyzed the facts of the case, including discrepancies in Panchnamas and the alleged ill conduct of officers involved in the case.

Justice Gedela observed, “The case, according to the prosecution, is hinged on the disclosure statement of one co-accused, while no contraband or any other psychotropic substance was recovered from the possession of the applicant.” The court delved into the legal aspects of admissibility of confessions made to NDPS officers, referring to recent precedents that emphasize the inadmissibility of such confessions.

Crucially, the judgement drew attention to the recent trend in legal interpretations that prioritize personal liberty and Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It cited various judgments to underscore that prolonged incarceration without a speedy trial can infringe upon an individual’s fundamental rights. The court held that the applicant, who had been in custody for nearly four years, is entitled to be released on regular bail.

The court framed stringent bail conditions, including surrendering the passport, cooperating in the trial, refraining from criminal activities, providing mobile numbers to investigating officers, and regularly informing authorities about movements outside Delhi-NCR. The court issued a stern warning that any breach of these conditions could lead to the revocation of bail.

Notably, the judgement refrained from expressing any opinion on the merits of the pending matter, focusing solely on the aspect of granting bail based on personal liberty considerations. The decision reflects a growing trend in the judicial system to ensure that the principle of “innocent until proven guilty” is upheld, while also addressing the issue of prolonged pretrial incarceration.

Date of Decision: August 17, 2023

BHASKAR KHATNANI   vs  NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

          

 

 

 

 

Similar News