Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

”As senior citizen’s right to seek benefit under the special statute abates on his/her death.” – PH HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh delivered its verdict in the case of Gurdeep Singh and others vs. Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Presiding Officer and another (LPA-2402-2017), upholding the decision of the Tribunal and rejecting the petition filed by the appellants.

”Transfer in favour of the ward is made with the pious hope that the transferee would continue to serve the parents as he was doing prior to execution of the document.”

The High Court bench comprising of Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jaishree Thakur and Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sukhvinder Kaur pronounced the judgement on July 21, 2023, after considering the arguments presented by the parties’ respective advocates.

The case revolved around the cancellation of a transfer deed executed under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007. The appellants, represented by Mr. G.S. Punia and Ms. Jagriti Kalia, challenged the order of the learned Single Judge who had upheld the Tribunal’s decision declaring the transfer deed void.

The crux of the dispute lay in the contention by respondent No.2, Nand Singh, that his son, petitioner No.1, had taken advantage of his illiteracy and transferred land to himself with the assurance of taking care of him. However, petitioner No.1 allegedly failed to provide the necessary maintenance and amenities, leading to the cancellation of the transfer deed.

”Legal heirs are given liberty to avail civil remedy available under law.”

In a crucial turn of events, the Court observed that respondent No.2, at whose instance the Maintenance/Appellate Tribunal had passed the impugned order, had since passed away, rendering the proceedings infructuous. The legal heirs were granted the liberty to pursue civil remedies available under the law, allowing them to challenge the transfer deed in question.

This landmark ruling sheds light on the complexities of intergenerational property transfers and sets a precedent for future cases under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007.

 

 Date of Decision: 21st July 2023

Gurdeep Singh and others  vs Sub Divisional Magistrate-cum-Presiding Officer and another 

Similar News