Second Appeal is Not a Forum for Rehearing or Reassessment of Evidence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Dismisses Partition Suit Appeal Failure of Justice Must Be Proved, Not Assumed: Calcutta High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Despite Charge Framing Lapse Bail is the Rule, Refusal is an Exception – Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored: Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Ivory Coast National in NDPS Case Courts Must Adopt a Justice-Oriented Approach in Matrimonial Cases: Gauhati High Court Condones Delay in Family Court Appeal FIR Quashing | Breath Analyzer Test Alone Cannot Prove Alcohol Consumption: Patna High Court Quashes FIR Under Bihar Prohibition Law Unregistered Writing Cannot Confer Ownership: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Dispute Allegations of Stalking and Criminal Intimidation Must Be Tested at Trial: Gujarat High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Nestlé Officials Over Maggi Noodles Controversy No Shortcuts in NDPS Investigations – J&K High Court Rebukes Casual Approach of Investigating Officers Sessions Court Cannot Order Re-Investigation: Allahabad High Court Quashes Direction Against Jaypee Hospital If Official Witnesses Are Reliable, Independent Corroboration Is Not a Must:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds NDPS Conviction No Service Tax Can Be Levied on Sale of Lottery Tickets: Supreme Court Rules That Lottery Distributors Are Not Agents Courts Cannot Be Silent Spectators When Justice Is Denied Due to Procedural Errors:  Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Recall of Bail Rejection Order Section 27 of the Evidence Act Requires Independent Corroboration—Mere Claims by Police Are Not Enough: Supreme Court on Flawed Investigation Confession to Police Is No Confession in Law: Supreme Court Acquits Man, Citing Inadmissibility of Statements Made in Custody Mere 'Last Seen Together' Is Not Enough for Conviction Unless It Forms a Complete Chain of Circumstantial Evidence: Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Sentence in 16-Year-Old Girl’s Murder Failure to Explain Wife’s Death Strengthens Guilt Under Section 106 of Evidence Act" – Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Child Witness Testimony Cannot Be Discarded Solely on Grounds of Tutoring: Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case

Arbitration Law: Arbitrators Has To Disclose Potential Conflicts Of Interest: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court of India has issued a ruling that emphasizes the crucial duty of arbitrators to disclose potential conflicts of interest. The judgment, delivered on October 19, 2023, by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Justice Aravind Kumar, addresses critical aspects of arbitration proceedings in India.

The judgment delves into the interpretation and application of various sections of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, shedding light on the independence and impartiality of arbitrators. In a significant observation, the Court stated, "Arbitrators must meticulously adhere to their duty of disclosure, ensuring transparency and fairness in the arbitration process."

The ruling also draws parallels with international standards, citing the IBA Guidelines (International Bar Association Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration) as a reference point for arbitrators' conduct. The Court noted, "The incorporation of IBA Guidelines underscores the importance of aligning Indian arbitration practices with global best practices."

One of the key highlights of the judgment is its comparison with the UK Supreme Court decision in Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd, 2021. The Court remarked, "The Halliburton decision serves as a guiding precedent, aligning the Indian arbitration landscape with international jurisprudence."

The judgment explores the statutory and non-statutory grounds for challenging arbitrators, providing clarity on when and how these grounds can be invoked. It underscores the significance of a robust and impartial arbitration process, stating, "The integrity of arbitration hinges on arbitrators' unwavering commitment to impartiality."

The decision also references various cases, including M/s. Voestalpine Schienen GMBH v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., HRD, Bharat Broad Band, ONGC, and National Highways Authority of India & Ors. vs. Gayatri Jhansi Roadways Limited & Ors., to illustrate its legal reasoning.

This landmark ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for arbitration in India, reinforcing the importance of transparency and fairness in dispute resolution. It sends a strong message to arbitrators to uphold their duty of disclosure, ultimately enhancing the credibility and effectiveness of arbitration proceedings in the country.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

CHENNAI METRO RAIL LIMITED ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING    vs M/S TRANSTONNELSTROY AFCONS (JV) & ANR.     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/19-Oct-2023-Chennai_Metro_Rail.pdf"]

Similar News