Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Arbitration Law: Arbitrators Has To Disclose Potential Conflicts Of Interest: Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a groundbreaking decision, the Supreme Court of India has issued a ruling that emphasizes the crucial duty of arbitrators to disclose potential conflicts of interest. The judgment, delivered on October 19, 2023, by a bench comprising Hon'ble Justice S. Ravindra Bhat and Hon'ble Justice Aravind Kumar, addresses critical aspects of arbitration proceedings in India.

The judgment delves into the interpretation and application of various sections of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, shedding light on the independence and impartiality of arbitrators. In a significant observation, the Court stated, "Arbitrators must meticulously adhere to their duty of disclosure, ensuring transparency and fairness in the arbitration process."

The ruling also draws parallels with international standards, citing the IBA Guidelines (International Bar Association Guidelines on Conflicts of Interest in International Arbitration) as a reference point for arbitrators' conduct. The Court noted, "The incorporation of IBA Guidelines underscores the importance of aligning Indian arbitration practices with global best practices."

One of the key highlights of the judgment is its comparison with the UK Supreme Court decision in Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd, 2021. The Court remarked, "The Halliburton decision serves as a guiding precedent, aligning the Indian arbitration landscape with international jurisprudence."

The judgment explores the statutory and non-statutory grounds for challenging arbitrators, providing clarity on when and how these grounds can be invoked. It underscores the significance of a robust and impartial arbitration process, stating, "The integrity of arbitration hinges on arbitrators' unwavering commitment to impartiality."

The decision also references various cases, including M/s. Voestalpine Schienen GMBH v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd., HRD, Bharat Broad Band, ONGC, and National Highways Authority of India & Ors. vs. Gayatri Jhansi Roadways Limited & Ors., to illustrate its legal reasoning.

This landmark ruling is expected to have far-reaching implications for arbitration in India, reinforcing the importance of transparency and fairness in dispute resolution. It sends a strong message to arbitrators to uphold their duty of disclosure, ultimately enhancing the credibility and effectiveness of arbitration proceedings in the country.

Date of Decision: 19 October 2023

CHENNAI METRO RAIL LIMITED ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING    vs M/S TRANSTONNELSTROY AFCONS (JV) & ANR.     

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/19-Oct-2023-Chennai_Metro_Rail.pdf"]

Latest Legal News