Court Must Conduct Inquiry on Mental Competency Before Appointing Legal Guardian - Punjab and Haryana High Court Right to Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Due to the Sentiments of Society: Kerala High Court Grants Bail in Eve Teasing Case Supreme Court Extends Probation to 70-Year-Old in Decades-Old Family Feud Case Authorized Railway Agents Cannot Be Criminally Prosecuted for Unauthorized Procurement And Supply Of Railway Tickets: Supreme Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Arbitrarily: Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Accused For Valid Arbitration Agreement and Party Consent Necessary: Supreme Court Declares Ex-Parte Arbitration Awards Null and Void NDPS | Lack of Homogeneous Mixing, Inventory Preparation, and Magistrate Certification Fatal to Prosecution's Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court "May Means May, and Shall Means Shall": Supreme Court Clarifies Appellate Court's Discretion Under Section 148 of NI Act Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Re-Evaluation of Coal Block Tender, Cites Concerns Over Arbitrary Disqualification Dying Declarations Must Be Beyond Doubt to Sustain Convictions: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Accused in Burn Injury Murder Case No Legally Enforceable Debt Proven: Madras High Court Dismisses Petition for Special Leave to Appeal in Cheque Bounce Case Decisional Autonomy is a Core Part of the Right to Privacy : Kerala High Court Upholds LGBTQ+ Rights in Landmark Habeas Corpus Case Consent of a Minor Is No Defense Under the POCSO Act: Himachal Pradesh High Court Well-Known Marks Demand Special Protection: Delhi HC Cancels Conflicting Trademark for RPG Industrial Products High Court Acquits Accused Due to ‘Golden Thread’ Principle: Gaps in Medical Evidence and Unexplained Time Frame Prove Decisive Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Citing Irretrievable Breakdown; Awards ₹12 Crore Permanent Alimony Cruelty Need Not Be Physical: Mental Agony and Emotional Distress Are Sufficient Grounds for Divorce: Supreme Court Section 195 Cr.P.C. | Tribunals Are Not Courts: Private Complaints for Offences Like False Evidence Valid: Supreme Court Limitation | Right to Appeal Is Fundamental, Especially When Liberty Is at Stake: Supreme Court Condones 1637-Day Delay FIR Quashed | No Mens Rea, No Crime: Supreme Court Emphasizes Protection of Public Servants Acting in Good Faith Trademark | Passing Off Rights Trump Registration Rights: Delhi High Court A Minor Procedural Delay Should Not Disqualify Advances as Export Credit When Exports Are Fulfilled on Time: Bombay HC Preventive Detention Must Be Based on Relevant and Proximate Material: J&K High Court Terrorism Stems From Hateful Thoughts, Not Physical Abilities: Madhya Pradesh High Court Denies Bail of Alleged ISIS Conspiracy Forwarding Offensive Content Equals Liability: Madras High Court Upholds Conviction for Derogatory Social Media Post Against Women Journalists Investigation by Trap Leader Prejudiced the Case: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Conviction in PC Case VAT | Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Cannot Reopen Assessment: Kerala High Court Fishing Inquiry Not Permissible Under Section 91, Cr.P.C.: High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Order Directing CBI to Produce Unrelied Statements and Case Diary Vague and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Sustain Criminal Prosecution in Matrimonial Disputes: Calcutta High Court High Court Emphasizes Assessee’s Burden of Proof in Unexplained Cash Deposits Case Effective, efficient, and expeditious alternative remedies have been provided by the statute: High Court Dismisses Petition for New Commercial Electricity Connection Maintenance Must Reflect Financial Realities and Social Standards: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Interim Maintenance in Domestic Violence Land Classified as Agricultural Not Automatically Exempt from SARFAESI Proceedings: High Court Permissive Use Cannot Ripen into Right of Prescriptive Easement: Kerala High Court High Court Slams Procedural Delays, Orders FSL Report in Assault Case to Prevent Miscarriage of Justice Petitioner Did Not Endorse Part-Payments on Cheque; Section 138 NI Act Not Attracted: Madras High Court Minority Christian Schools Not Bound by Rules of 2018; Disciplinary Proceedings Can Continue: High Court of Calcutta Lack of Independent Witnesses Undermines Prosecution: Madras High Court Reaffirms Acquittal in SCST Case Proceedings Before Tribunal Are Summary in Nature and It Need Not Be Conducted Like Civil Suits: Kerala High Court Affirms Award in Accident Claim Affidavit Not Sufficient to Transfer Title Punjab and Haryana High Court

Approver Released From Custody Despite Mandatory Detention; Judicial Discretion Favors Humane Consideration Over Rigorous Interpretation of Law: Delhi High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment by the Delhi High Court, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma has ordered the release of Amit Chakraborty, an approver in a case involving unlawful activities and conspiracy, from judicial custody. The court exercised its inherent powers under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) to override the mandatory detention provision under Section 306(4)(b) of the Cr.P.C.

The petitioner, Amit Chakraborty, was involved in a conspiracy linked to illegal funding activities threatening the sovereignty and integrity of India, registered under various sections of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the Indian Penal Code. Arrested in October 2023, Chakraborty was later granted pardon upon agreeing to become an approver. Despite this, statutory provisions mandated his continued custody until the trial's conclusion.

The court delved into the principles underlying Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., which allows for judicial discretion to intervene in cases to prevent the abuse of process or to secure the ends of justice. Citing multiple precedents, Justice Sharma highlighted the importance of considering individual circumstances over strict statutory interpretations that might contravene constitutional rights under Article 21.

Tender of Pardon and Judicial Precedents: The judgment reflected on several landmark decisions which established that High Courts, utilizing their inherent powers, can release an approver from custody to uphold justice and prevent undue hardship.

Medical Condition and Humanitarian Grounds: Chakraborty’s severe post-polio residual paralysis and his consequent physical limitations significantly influenced the court’s decision. It emphasized a "humane and understanding approach" over a mechanical application of law.

Procedural Safeguards and Future Compliance: The court mandated that Chakraborty adhere strictly to the conditions of his pardon, including truthful testimony and compliance with all court directives. The potential application of Section 308 of Cr.P.C. was noted, which provides for penal consequences if Chakraborty fails to meet these conditions.

Decision: Justice Sharma ordered Chakraborty's release on a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with stringent conditions, balancing legal mandates with considerations of individual rights and medical exigencies.

Date of Decision: May 6, 2024.

Amit Chakraborty vs. State NCT of Delhi,

Similar News