Readiness and Willingness Under Section 16(c) Is Not a Ritualistic Phrase — Plaintiff Must Prove It With Substance, Not Just Words: Karnataka High Court FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Quashed: Patna High Court Slams SP for 'Non-Application of Mind' and 'Absence of Credible Source Information' Ownership of Vehicle Linked to Commercial Quantity of Heroin – Custodial Interrogation Necessary: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 BNSS Death Caused by Rash Driving Is Not a Private Dispute — No FIR Quashing on Basis of Compromise in Section 106 BNS Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court No Bank Can Override Court Orders: Rajasthan High Court Slams Axis Bank for Unauthorized Withdrawal from Court-Ordered FD" Indian Courts Cannot Invalidate Foreign Arbitral Awards Passed Under Foreign Law: Madhya Pradesh High Court Enforces Texas-Based Award Despite Commercial Court’s Contrary Decree Sudden Quarrel over Mound of Earth — Not Murder but Culpable Homicide: Allahabad High Court Eligibility Flows from Birth, Not a Certificate Date: Delhi High Court Strikes Down Rule Fixing Arbitrary Cut-Off for OBC-NCL Certificates in CAPF (AC) Recruitment Bar Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Cannot Be Invoked Where Specific Performance Was Legally Premature Due To Statutory Impediments: P&H High Court Calling Wife by Her Caste Name in Public Just Before Suicide is Immediate Cause of Self-Immolation: Madras High Court Upholds Husband’s Conviction Under Section 306 IPC No Work No Pay Is Not a Universal Rule: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dock Identification Without Prior TIP Is Absolutely Useless: P&H High Court Upholds Acquittal in Attempt to Murder Case Filing Forged Court Pleadings in Union Government’s Name is Criminal Contempt: Karnataka High Court Sentences Litigant to Jail Execution of Will Proved, But Probate Justly Denied Due to Concealment of Property Sale: Delhi High Court Mere Designation Doesn’t Establish Criminal Liability: Bombay High Court Quashes Proceedings Against ICICI Officials in Octroi Evasion Case Fraud on Power Voids the Order: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Karnataka BJP Leader R. Ashoka, Slams Politically Motivated Prosecution Cause of Fire Is Immaterial If Fire Itself Is Insured Peril: Supreme Court Rebukes Insurer’s Repudiation Dragging a Trained Army Officer Up 20 Steps Without Resistance? The Story Lacks Credence: Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in Army Officer’s Murder Semen Stains Alone Do Not Prove Rape: Supreme Court Acquits Doctor Accused of Rape No Mortgage, No SARFAESI: Supreme Court Rules Against NEDFi, Says Recovery Action in Nagaland Without Security Agreement Was Illegal Parity Cannot Be Denied by Geography: Supreme Court Holds Jharkhand Bound by Patna HC's Judgment, Orders Pay Revision for Industries Officer Once Power Flows Continuously from a Synchronized Turbine, It Is No Longer Infirm: Supreme Court Orders TANGEDCO to Pay Fixed Charges to Penna Electricity

Appellant Has Been Subjected to Cruelty at the Hands of Respondent-Wife: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce to the appellant, Pramod, on the grounds of cruelty by the respondent, Umesh @ Poonam, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Court focused on the concept of cruelty in matrimonial life, as defined by various Supreme Court judgments. The assessment revolved around whether the conduct of one spouse subjected the other to mental or physical cruelty, sufficient to disrupt marital obligations.

The appellant, Pramod, married the respondent in 2007, facing a tumultuous marital relationship marked by allegations of dowry demand, physical abuse, and frequent abandonment of the matrimonial home by the respondent. The case involved considerations under Sections 498A, 323, and 406 of IPC, with the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage citing cruelty.

The Court extensively reviewed testimony and evidence, examining instances of marital discord, living arrangements, and the impact of uncorroborated allegations. The appellant’s efforts to maintain matrimonial harmony and the respondent’s resistance were noted, alongside the respondent’s repeated departures to her parental home. The Court took into account the acquittal of the appellant in the dowry demand case and recognized the mental strain and reputation damage inflicted upon him by these grave but unsupported allegations.

The High Court set aside the Family Court’s judgment, concluding that the appellant had indeed been subjected to cruelty by the respondent. The Court thereby granted the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Date of Decision: March 01, 2024.

Xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News