Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Appellant Has Been Subjected to Cruelty at the Hands of Respondent-Wife: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce to the appellant, Pramod, on the grounds of cruelty by the respondent, Umesh @ Poonam, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Court focused on the concept of cruelty in matrimonial life, as defined by various Supreme Court judgments. The assessment revolved around whether the conduct of one spouse subjected the other to mental or physical cruelty, sufficient to disrupt marital obligations.

The appellant, Pramod, married the respondent in 2007, facing a tumultuous marital relationship marked by allegations of dowry demand, physical abuse, and frequent abandonment of the matrimonial home by the respondent. The case involved considerations under Sections 498A, 323, and 406 of IPC, with the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage citing cruelty.

The Court extensively reviewed testimony and evidence, examining instances of marital discord, living arrangements, and the impact of uncorroborated allegations. The appellant’s efforts to maintain matrimonial harmony and the respondent’s resistance were noted, alongside the respondent’s repeated departures to her parental home. The Court took into account the acquittal of the appellant in the dowry demand case and recognized the mental strain and reputation damage inflicted upon him by these grave but unsupported allegations.

The High Court set aside the Family Court’s judgment, concluding that the appellant had indeed been subjected to cruelty by the respondent. The Court thereby granted the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Date of Decision: March 01, 2024.

Xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News