MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |    

Appellant Has Been Subjected to Cruelty at the Hands of Respondent-Wife: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce to the appellant, Pramod, on the grounds of cruelty by the respondent, Umesh @ Poonam, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Court focused on the concept of cruelty in matrimonial life, as defined by various Supreme Court judgments. The assessment revolved around whether the conduct of one spouse subjected the other to mental or physical cruelty, sufficient to disrupt marital obligations.

The appellant, Pramod, married the respondent in 2007, facing a tumultuous marital relationship marked by allegations of dowry demand, physical abuse, and frequent abandonment of the matrimonial home by the respondent. The case involved considerations under Sections 498A, 323, and 406 of IPC, with the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage citing cruelty.

The Court extensively reviewed testimony and evidence, examining instances of marital discord, living arrangements, and the impact of uncorroborated allegations. The appellant’s efforts to maintain matrimonial harmony and the respondent’s resistance were noted, alongside the respondent’s repeated departures to her parental home. The Court took into account the acquittal of the appellant in the dowry demand case and recognized the mental strain and reputation damage inflicted upon him by these grave but unsupported allegations.

The High Court set aside the Family Court’s judgment, concluding that the appellant had indeed been subjected to cruelty by the respondent. The Court thereby granted the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Date of Decision: March 01, 2024.

Xxx vs xxx

Similar News