MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Appellant Has Been Subjected to Cruelty at the Hands of Respondent-Wife: Delhi High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court granted a divorce to the appellant, Pramod, on the grounds of cruelty by the respondent, Umesh @ Poonam, under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Court focused on the concept of cruelty in matrimonial life, as defined by various Supreme Court judgments. The assessment revolved around whether the conduct of one spouse subjected the other to mental or physical cruelty, sufficient to disrupt marital obligations.

The appellant, Pramod, married the respondent in 2007, facing a tumultuous marital relationship marked by allegations of dowry demand, physical abuse, and frequent abandonment of the matrimonial home by the respondent. The case involved considerations under Sections 498A, 323, and 406 of IPC, with the appellant seeking dissolution of marriage citing cruelty.

The Court extensively reviewed testimony and evidence, examining instances of marital discord, living arrangements, and the impact of uncorroborated allegations. The appellant’s efforts to maintain matrimonial harmony and the respondent’s resistance were noted, alongside the respondent’s repeated departures to her parental home. The Court took into account the acquittal of the appellant in the dowry demand case and recognized the mental strain and reputation damage inflicted upon him by these grave but unsupported allegations.

The High Court set aside the Family Court’s judgment, concluding that the appellant had indeed been subjected to cruelty by the respondent. The Court thereby granted the dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

Date of Decision: March 01, 2024.

Xxx vs xxx

Latest Legal News