Sale Deeds Must Be Interpreted Literally When the Language is Clear and Unambiguous: Supreme Court    |     Non-Signatory Can Be Bound by Arbitration Clause Based on Conduct and Involvement: Supreme Court    |     Right to Passport is a Fundamental Right, Denial Without Justification Violates Article 21: Allahabad High Court    |     Insurance Company's Liability Remains Despite Policy Cancellation Due to Dishonored Cheque: Calcutta High Court    |     Deductions Under Sections 36(1)(vii) and 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act Are Independent and Cannot Be Curtailed: Bombay High Court    |     Diary Entries Cannot Alone Implicate the Accused Without Corroborative Evidence: Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case    |     MACT | Fraud Vitiates All Judicial Acts, Even Without Specific Review Powers: Rajasthan High Court    |     Right of Private Defense Cannot Be Weighed in Golden Scales: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case    |     If Two Reasonable Conclusions Are Possible, Acquittal Should Not Be Disturbed: Supreme Court    |     Kalelkar Award Explicitly Provides Holiday Benefits for Temporary Employees, Not Subject to Government Circulars: Supreme Court Upholds Holiday and Overtime Pay    |     NDPS | Homogeneous Mixing of Bulk Drugs Essential for Valid Sampling Under NDPS Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court    |     Pre-Arrest Bail Not a Right but an Exception: Himachal High Court Denied Bail In Dowry Death Case"    |     POCSO | Scholar Register Is Sufficient to Determine Victim’s Age in POCSO Cases: Madhya Pradesh High Court    |     Abuse of Official Position in Appointments: Prima Facie Case for Criminal Misconduct: Delhi High Court Upholds Framing of Charges Against Swati Maliwal in DCW Corruption Case    |     Service Law | Similarly Situated Employees Cannot Be Denied Equal Treatment: PH High Court Orders Regularization    |     Presumption of Innocence Remains Supreme Unless Clearly Overturned: PH High Court Affirming Acquittal    |     Any Physical Liaison with A Girl Of Less Than Eighteen Years Is A Strict Offense.: Patna High Court Reiterates Strict Stance On Sexual Offences Against Minors    |     Orissa High Court Rules Res Judicata Inapplicable When Multiple Appeals Arise from Same Judgment    |     Mandatory Section 80 Notice Cannot Be Bypassed Lightly:  Jammu & Kashmir High Court Returns Plaint for Non-Compliance    |     Bombay High Court Denies Permanent Lecturer Appointment for Failing to Meet UGC Eligibility Criteria at Time of Appointment    |     Deferred Cross-Examination Gave Time for Witness Tampering, Undermining Fair Trial: Allahabad High Court    |     Dowry Death | Presumption Under Section 113-B Not Applicable as No Proof of Cruelty Soon Before Death : Supreme Court    |     Gift Deed Voided as Son Fails to Care for Elderly Mother, Karnataka High Court Asserts ‘Implied Duty’ in Property Transfers    |     Denial of a legible 164 statement is a denial of a fair trial guaranteed by the Constitution of India: Kerala High Court    |     Safety Shoes Used as Weapon Meets Mens Rea Requirement for Murder: Rajasthan HC on Bail Denial    |     Fraud on the Courts Cannot Be Tolerated: Supreme Court Ordered CBI Investigation Against Advocate    |     Land Acquisition | Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. (JAL) Liable for Compensation under Supplementary Award, Not Ultra-Tech Cement Ltd.: Supreme Court    |     Non-Mentioning of Bail Orders in Detention Reflects Clear Non-Application of Mind: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order    |     Conviction Under Arms Act and Criminal Conspiracy Quashed Due to Non-Seizure of Key Evidence and Failure to Prove Ownership of Box: Jharkhand High Court    |     Prima Facie Proof of Valid Marriage Required Before Awarding Maintenance Under Section 125 Cr.P.C: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Interim Maintenance Order    |    

Any Action To Withdraw The Qualification Obtained By The Petitioner Would Be A National Loss – Bombay High Court Upholds Cancellation Of Non-Creamy Layer Certificate But Allows Retention Of MBBS Degree

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a pivotal decision by the Bombay High Court, the cancellation of a Non-Creamy Layer Certificate leading to the revocation of MBBS course admission was upheld, addressing critical questions under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. This case revolves around the invalidity of the Non-Creamy Layer Certificate used by the petitioner, Lubna Mujawar, for gaining admission under the OBC quota in a medical college, which was later found to be based on misrepresented facts concerning her parental income.

The issue arose when an MBBS aspirant challenged the admissions under the OBC category, leading to an inquiry against all beneficiaries, including the petitioner. It was discovered that the petitioner’s father had misrepresented marital status and spouse’s income on the certificate application. The critical question was whether the admission based on such a certificate should stand when the eligibility criteria were not genuinely met.

The court noted that the petitioner’s father misrepresented his marital status and spouse’s income, which directly influenced the eligibility under the OBC quota. “The application is based on incorrect, wrong and false information,” Justice Jitendra Jain observed, emphasizing the importance of integrity in the admission process.

Despite the unfair means, the court recognized the practical implications of retracting a medical degree after completion. “In our country, where the ratio of Doctors to the population is very low, any action to withdraw the qualification obtained by the petitioner would be a national loss,” the court stated, allowing the petitioner to retain her degree but categorizing her as an Open Category student.

The petitioner was ordered to pay the fee difference applicable to the Open Category and a cost of Rs. 50,000 to the hospital, addressing the financial inequities and moral implications of her actions.

Decision: The High Court upheld the cancellation of the Non-Creamy Layer Certificate and consequent admission cancellation. However, the court also ordered that the petitioner be allowed to retain her MBBS degree, provided she pays the necessary fee difference and a penalty, reinforcing the balance between maintaining admission integrity and recognizing the completed education under judicial interim orders.

Date of Decision: 9th May 2024

Miss. Lubna Shoukat Mujawar vs. State of Maharashtra & Others

Similar News