Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

Anticipatory Bail to Petitioner Alleging Conspiracy and Fraud - Compliance with Loan Procedure: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Paramjit Kohli, who was accused of various offenses under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The court emphasized the importance of complying with loan procedures and the petitioner’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation.

The petitioner’s plea for anticipatory bail was rooted in the allegations that he was a victim of a larger conspiracy. It was alleged that he had obtained loans against gold jewelry from Bank of India, Sector 16 Branch, Panchkula, and that the bank officials were involved in fraudulent activities. Several similar cases involving other individuals had been registered, leading the petitioner’s counsel to argue that the allegations against the bank officials warranted careful consideration.

Justice Jhingan, in his observations, made it clear that the court’s remarks were not indicative of the case’s merits. He stressed that the petitioner had adhered to the bank’s procedures for availing the loan, and that the jewelry had been verified in the presence of bank officials by the empaneled jeweler. Furthermore, the petitioner had willingly joined the ongoing investigation, making his cooperation evident.

The court concluded by making the interim anticipatory bail granted earlier absolute, subject to the petitioner’s continued compliance with Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and his active involvement in the ongoing investigation. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to procedural norms while highlighting that the observations did not express an opinion on the case’s merits.

The judgment referred to previous cases, including an order dated 27th April 2022 in ‘Vipin Bakshi v. State of Haryana’ and an order dated 10th August 2022 in ‘Sanjana Goyal v. State of Haryana’, both of which were passed by coordinate benches of the court. This further solidified the court’s approach to similar cases.

Date of Decision: 16th August, 2023

Paramjit Kohli vs State of Haryana  

Latest Legal News