Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Anticipatory Bail to Petitioner Alleging Conspiracy and Fraud - Compliance with Loan Procedure: P&H HC

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a recent development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Paramjit Kohli, who was accused of various offenses under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The court emphasized the importance of complying with loan procedures and the petitioner’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation.

The petitioner’s plea for anticipatory bail was rooted in the allegations that he was a victim of a larger conspiracy. It was alleged that he had obtained loans against gold jewelry from Bank of India, Sector 16 Branch, Panchkula, and that the bank officials were involved in fraudulent activities. Several similar cases involving other individuals had been registered, leading the petitioner’s counsel to argue that the allegations against the bank officials warranted careful consideration.

Justice Jhingan, in his observations, made it clear that the court’s remarks were not indicative of the case’s merits. He stressed that the petitioner had adhered to the bank’s procedures for availing the loan, and that the jewelry had been verified in the presence of bank officials by the empaneled jeweler. Furthermore, the petitioner had willingly joined the ongoing investigation, making his cooperation evident.

The court concluded by making the interim anticipatory bail granted earlier absolute, subject to the petitioner’s continued compliance with Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and his active involvement in the ongoing investigation. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to procedural norms while highlighting that the observations did not express an opinion on the case’s merits.

The judgment referred to previous cases, including an order dated 27th April 2022 in ‘Vipin Bakshi v. State of Haryana’ and an order dated 10th August 2022 in ‘Sanjana Goyal v. State of Haryana’, both of which were passed by coordinate benches of the court. This further solidified the court’s approach to similar cases.

Date of Decision: 16th August, 2023

Paramjit Kohli vs State of Haryana  

Latest Legal News