Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Anticipatory Bail to Petitioner Alleging Conspiracy and Fraud - Compliance with Loan Procedure: P&H HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Avneesh Jhingan, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Paramjit Kohli, who was accused of various offenses under Sections 120-B, 406, 420, 468, and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The court emphasized the importance of complying with loan procedures and the petitioner’s cooperation with the ongoing investigation.

The petitioner’s plea for anticipatory bail was rooted in the allegations that he was a victim of a larger conspiracy. It was alleged that he had obtained loans against gold jewelry from Bank of India, Sector 16 Branch, Panchkula, and that the bank officials were involved in fraudulent activities. Several similar cases involving other individuals had been registered, leading the petitioner’s counsel to argue that the allegations against the bank officials warranted careful consideration.

Justice Jhingan, in his observations, made it clear that the court’s remarks were not indicative of the case’s merits. He stressed that the petitioner had adhered to the bank’s procedures for availing the loan, and that the jewelry had been verified in the presence of bank officials by the empaneled jeweler. Furthermore, the petitioner had willingly joined the ongoing investigation, making his cooperation evident.

The court concluded by making the interim anticipatory bail granted earlier absolute, subject to the petitioner’s continued compliance with Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and his active involvement in the ongoing investigation. The judgment underscored the significance of adhering to procedural norms while highlighting that the observations did not express an opinion on the case’s merits.

The judgment referred to previous cases, including an order dated 27th April 2022 in ‘Vipin Bakshi v. State of Haryana’ and an order dated 10th August 2022 in ‘Sanjana Goyal v. State of Haryana’, both of which were passed by coordinate benches of the court. This further solidified the court’s approach to similar cases.

Date of Decision: 16th August, 2023

Paramjit Kohli vs State of Haryana  

Latest Legal News