Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

Anticipatory Bail Granted to Former Deputy C.M. Sukhbir Badal Unprovoked Firing Conspiracy Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case involving an alleged conspiracy related to unprovoked firing upon peaceful protesters.

The judgment, pronounced on September 29, 2023, addresses a series of petitions (CRM-M-14308, 14326, 14915, 14921, 14926, and 16991 of 2023) with similar facts and a common prayer. It marks a crucial turning point in a case where the petitioners had previously faced dismissal of their bail applications.

The case had its roots in a religious congregation held in 2007, which sparked controversy. The FIR filed in the aftermath of the incident led to subsequent developments, including sacrilege incidents and growing resentment among Sikh communities.

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) conducting the investigation implicated several individuals, including the petitioners. The judgment outlined the specific actions attributed to each accused, based on the SIT’s findings.

Justice Chitkara’s judgment highlighted the pivotal factors leading to the grant of anticipatory bail. He emphasized the lack of a need for custodial interrogation, the magnitude of the crime, and the quality of evidence collected.

“In the present case, the magnitude of the crime was undoubtedly massive; still, the evidence collected against the petitioners is based on presumptions that the petitioners were involved in the conspiracy, and the evidence prima facie lacks evidence qua motive,” the judgment noted.

Furthermore, the judgment made it clear that the petitioners would not influence or tamper with witnesses or the investigation. It outlined conditions for the grant of anticipatory bail, which were to be strictly followed.

The judgment cited legal precedents, including cases such as Mahdoom Bava v. Central Bureau of Investigation, Sidharth v. State of UP, and Aman Preet Singh v. CBI, in support of its decision.

This judgment stands as a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings, allowing the petitioners relief in the form of anticipatory bail while awaiting further trial.

DATE OF DECISION: September 29, 2023

Sukhbir Singh Badal   Vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News