Ocular Evidence Prevails Over Medical Findings: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Despite Negative Semen Report & Police Lapses High Court Cannot Pass Inconsistent Orders: Supreme Court Quashes Demolition Order Passed Despite Earlier Restraint In CMDA Regularisation Dispute Supreme Court Upholds Validity Of Open University Degrees Obtained Prior To 2017 Cut-Off Must Be A Polluter Before Being Held Absolutely Liable: Supreme Court Sets Aside NGT Order Against Art Of Living Over Yamuna Event, Orders ₹5 Cr Refund Father Cannot Be Deprived Of Minor's Custody Unless Proved Unfit: Allahabad High Court Hands Over 4-Yr-Old Child To Father, Sets Aside Trial Court Order Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Integral To Personal Liberty': Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As 24 Witnesses Remain Unexamined No Specific Chemical Opinion That Seized Substance Was Ganja: Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal Under Section 2(iii)(b) NDPS Act Mere Pendency Of Criminal Cases Simplicitor No Ground For Externment': Karnataka High Court Quashes Raichur SDM Order Order VI Rule 16 CPC | Defendants Enjoy Greater Latitude In Altering Defence: Punjab & Haryana High Court Explains Doctrinal Leeway Under CPC Boarding Running Train Not Self-Inflicted Injury: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Order Denying Compensation Possession Of One Co-Sharer Is Possession Of All: J&K&L High Court Cannot Invoke Article 226 For Registering FIR Or Restoring Water Supply: Kerala High Court Natural Guardian's Sale Of Minor's Property Without Court Nod Is Voidable, Extinguishes If Not Challenged Within 3 Years Of Majority: Madras High Court Orissa High Court Rejects Cancer-Survivor Husband's Plea To Transfer Maintenance Case Presumption Of Correctness Of Judicial Records Not Absolute And Can Be Rebutted By Direct Evidence: Kerala High Court on Married Daughter Cannot Challenge Partition After 21-Year Slumber If She Had Knowledge: Madhya Pradesh High Court Kerala High Court Orders Immediate Suspension Of Lakshadweep CJM For Allegedly Forging Witness Deposition To Convict Accused Defect In Served Copy Of Affidavit Not Fatal: Supreme Court Restores Election Petition Challenging Lok Sabha Poll Result, Clarifies Law On Form-25 Attestation

Anticipatory Bail Granted to Former Deputy C.M. Sukhbir Badal Unprovoked Firing Conspiracy Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant legal development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case involving an alleged conspiracy related to unprovoked firing upon peaceful protesters.

The judgment, pronounced on September 29, 2023, addresses a series of petitions (CRM-M-14308, 14326, 14915, 14921, 14926, and 16991 of 2023) with similar facts and a common prayer. It marks a crucial turning point in a case where the petitioners had previously faced dismissal of their bail applications.

The case had its roots in a religious congregation held in 2007, which sparked controversy. The FIR filed in the aftermath of the incident led to subsequent developments, including sacrilege incidents and growing resentment among Sikh communities.

The Special Investigation Team (SIT) conducting the investigation implicated several individuals, including the petitioners. The judgment outlined the specific actions attributed to each accused, based on the SIT’s findings.

Justice Chitkara’s judgment highlighted the pivotal factors leading to the grant of anticipatory bail. He emphasized the lack of a need for custodial interrogation, the magnitude of the crime, and the quality of evidence collected.

“In the present case, the magnitude of the crime was undoubtedly massive; still, the evidence collected against the petitioners is based on presumptions that the petitioners were involved in the conspiracy, and the evidence prima facie lacks evidence qua motive,” the judgment noted.

Furthermore, the judgment made it clear that the petitioners would not influence or tamper with witnesses or the investigation. It outlined conditions for the grant of anticipatory bail, which were to be strictly followed.

The judgment cited legal precedents, including cases such as Mahdoom Bava v. Central Bureau of Investigation, Sidharth v. State of UP, and Aman Preet Singh v. CBI, in support of its decision.

This judgment stands as a significant development in the ongoing legal proceedings, allowing the petitioners relief in the form of anticipatory bail while awaiting further trial.

DATE OF DECISION: September 29, 2023

Sukhbir Singh Badal   Vs State of Punjab

Latest Legal News