Non-Compliance With Rule 14 Of NDPS Rules 2022 Regarding Quantitative Test Vitiates Prosecution Case And Renders Detention Illegal: Allahabad High Court Supreme Court Directs Systematic Audit And Institutional Accountability For Safety In Public Spaces Under Article 21 Extra-Judicial Confession Made Before Police Cannot Solely Sustain Preventive Detention: Supreme Court Pre-Trial Incarceration Cannot Masquerade As Punitive Detention When Trial Is Not Imminent: Supreme Court Land Acquisition | Radial ‘Hub-And-Spoke’ Valuation Models For Contiguous Lands Are Legally Unsustainable: Supreme Court Forfeiture Of Earnest Money Deposit Is A Valid Consequence Upon Failure To Pay Balance Sale Consideration Under IBC Liquidation Process: Supreme Court Res Judicata | Suit For Specific Performance Barred If Relief Was Available In Prior Suit For Permanent Injunction And Not Claimed: Supreme Court RERA | Allottee’s Right To Seek Refund Is Absolute And Unqualified, Not Subject To Promoter’s Completion Of Project: Bombay High Court Order 1 Rule 10(2) CPC | Appellate Court Cannot Summarily Reject Addition Of Legal Heirs Based On Unproven Documents Without Reason: Calcutta High Court Order XIV Rule 5 CPC | Trial Court Must Frame Additional Issues Based On Liberty Granted By Supreme Court To Ensure Just Adjudication: Delhi High Court Mere Citation Of Wrong Provision Does Not Invalidate Order If Court Possessed Jurisdiction: Gujarat High Court Injunction Under Order 39 Rules 1 & 2 CPC Cannot Be Granted Over Large Unidentified Tract Of Land Without Establishing Prima Facie Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 125 CrPC | Mere Rejection Of Permanent Alimony Plea In Divorce Proceedings Does Not Bar Claim For Maintenance: Karnataka High Court Section 311 BNSS | Trial Court Has Discretion To Record Evidence In Narrative Form; Accused Cannot Insist On Question-Answer Format: Kerala High Court Section 482 CrPC | Principle Of Parity Cannot Be Invoked To Quash FIR If Allegations Against Accused Are Distinct And Substantiated: Madhya Pradesh High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Tribunal Cannot Grant 'Right Of Recovery' To Insurer Without Evidence Of Policy Violation: Orissa High Court Mere Inadequacy Of Consideration Or Illiteracy Does Not Vitiate Specific Performance Unless Exploitation Is Proved: Madras High Court Contempt Jurisdiction Cannot Be Converted Into Parallel Forum To Enforce Civil Decrees: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 18 Rule 17 CPC | Reopening Evidence At The Stage Of Arguments Without Compelling Grounds Amounts To Abuse Of Process: Telangana High Court Cannot Circumvent Bail Granted By Supreme Court: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes PITNDPS Preventive Detention Order

“Anticipatory Bail Granted: ‘A Lady Cannot Be Forced to Marry a Person Even if She Had Earlier Developed Intimacy With Him,’ Says Punjab and Haryana High Court”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, August 24, 2023 – In a significant ruling today, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Gurleen Kaur, who was accused in an abetment to suicide case. The judgment was pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh.

The case revolved around an FIR filed against Gurleen Kaur under Section 306 of the IPC, alleging that she was responsible for the suicide of a young man named Rahul. The two had met at a coaching center and developed an intimate relationship, which later became strained.

In his observation, Justice Gurbir Singh stated, “A lady cannot be forced to marry a person even if she had earlier developed intimacy with him.” The court found that no overt act had been attributed to the petitioner that led to the suicide of the deceased.

The court also emphasized that custodial interrogation of the petitioner was unnecessary. “The petitioner is an unmarried girl and no recovery is to be effected from her,” the judgment read.

Gurleen Kaur was directed to join the investigation as and when required and was granted bail upon furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds. She is also required to abide by conditions specified under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The judgment cited several precedents, including Gurcharan Singh vs. State of Punjab and Mukesh Kher vs. State of Haryana, but noted that these were not directly applicable to the facts of the present case.

This ruling is expected to have implications for similar cases where the role of a woman in abetment to suicide is under scrutiny. Legal experts believe that the judgment could serve as a precedent in emphasizing personal liberty and the limitations of custodial interrogation.

Date of Decision: August 24, 2023

Gurleen Kaur  vs State of Punjab   

Latest Legal News