Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“Anticipatory Bail Granted: ‘A Lady Cannot Be Forced to Marry a Person Even if She Had Earlier Developed Intimacy With Him,’ Says Punjab and Haryana High Court”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Chandigarh, August 24, 2023 – In a significant ruling today, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Gurleen Kaur, who was accused in an abetment to suicide case. The judgment was pronounced by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh.

The case revolved around an FIR filed against Gurleen Kaur under Section 306 of the IPC, alleging that she was responsible for the suicide of a young man named Rahul. The two had met at a coaching center and developed an intimate relationship, which later became strained.

In his observation, Justice Gurbir Singh stated, “A lady cannot be forced to marry a person even if she had earlier developed intimacy with him.” The court found that no overt act had been attributed to the petitioner that led to the suicide of the deceased.

The court also emphasized that custodial interrogation of the petitioner was unnecessary. “The petitioner is an unmarried girl and no recovery is to be effected from her,” the judgment read.

Gurleen Kaur was directed to join the investigation as and when required and was granted bail upon furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds. She is also required to abide by conditions specified under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The judgment cited several precedents, including Gurcharan Singh vs. State of Punjab and Mukesh Kher vs. State of Haryana, but noted that these were not directly applicable to the facts of the present case.

This ruling is expected to have implications for similar cases where the role of a woman in abetment to suicide is under scrutiny. Legal experts believe that the judgment could serve as a precedent in emphasizing personal liberty and the limitations of custodial interrogation.

Date of Decision: August 24, 2023

Gurleen Kaur  vs State of Punjab   

Latest Legal News