Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

“An Imminent Need to Evolve a Global Consensus”: Delhi Court Issues ‘Dynamic  Injunction’ Against Internet Piracy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision aimed at combating internet piracy, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice PRATHIBA M. SINGH, has issued a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’ against rogue websites involved in unauthorized streaming, reproduction, and distribution of copyrighted content.

Highlighting the global issue of piracy, the Court observed, ”The dynamism of the injunction, by itself, in one country or another may not, however, be sufficient to protect copyright owners. There is an imminent need to evolve a global consensus in this regard.” [Para 16]

The judgment comes in response to a suit filed by well-established Hollywood Studios against various websites that permit unauthorized viewing, streaming, accessing, and downloading of their content. The Court recognized the immediate and severe monetary loss that can occur from piracy and emphasized the need for innovative remedies to keep pace with technological advancements.

In a strong message against internet piracy, the Court stated, ”As innovation in technology continues, remedies to be granted also ought to be calibrated by Courts.” [Para 19]

The decision includes an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants from any manner of streaming, reproducing, distributing, or communicating the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted content, including future works. ISPs were directed to block said websites, and Domain Name Registrars were ordered to lock and suspend domain names, providing details to Plaintiffs.

The Court also referred to a recent Bombay High Court decision in Applause Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. V. Meta Platforms Inc., emphasizing the need for dynamic injunctions that extend to future content.

This judgment reflects a comprehensive approach to combating internet piracy, recognizing the dynamic nature of infringement, and providing a robust legal framework to protect copyright owners.

Date of decision: 9th August, 2023

 

 UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC.  AND ORS. vs DOTMOVIES.BABY AND ORS.

Similar News