Benefit Of Acquittal Can Be Extended To Non-Appealing Co-Accused If Prosecution Case Is Found To Be Fundamentally Unreliable: Madras High Court Hindu Marriage Act | Petition For Restitution Of Conjugal Rights Serves As A Valid Defence Against Allegations Of Desertion: Kerala High Court Employee Has No Vested Right To Seek Or Retain Additional Charge; Writ Petition Not Maintainable To Challenge Its Withdrawal: Madhya Pradesh High Court Insurance Act | Insurer Cannot Waive Statutory Deadline For Premium Payment Under Bank Guarantee; No Estoppel Against Statute: NCDRC Absence Of Crime Number In Inquest Report & Discrepancy In Sec 157 CrPC Special Report Renders FIR Doubtful: Allahabad High Court MTP Act  | Termination Of Pregnancy Beyond 24 Weeks Permissible If It Involves Risk To Life Or Grave Injury To Mental Health Of The Victim: Gujarat High Court Section 174A IPC | FIR Cannot Be Quashed If Process Server Reports Indicate Failure To Serve At Ordinary Residence: Delhi High Court Issues Guidelines Insolvency Petition | Transferees Of Debtor Cannot Substitute Debtor To Rebut Allegation Of Intent To Defeat Creditors Under Section 6(b) Provincial Insolvency Act: High Court Medical Negligence | Doctor Cannot Be Held Liable For Choosing One Reasonable Course Of Treatment Over Another: Bombay High Court Cruelty | Non-Registration Of FIR Cannot Be Ground To Discredit Testimony Of Wife Seeking Divorce: Jharkhand High Court No Deception At Inception: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Revive Cheating Charges Against Borrower After One-Time Settlement Consumer Protection Act | Doctrine Of 'Caveat Emptor' Subservient To 'Caveat Venditor'; Auctioneer Liable For Sale Of Encumbered Vehicle: State Commission

“An Imminent Need to Evolve a Global Consensus”: Delhi Court Issues ‘Dynamic  Injunction’ Against Internet Piracy

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision aimed at combating internet piracy, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice PRATHIBA M. SINGH, has issued a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’ against rogue websites involved in unauthorized streaming, reproduction, and distribution of copyrighted content.

Highlighting the global issue of piracy, the Court observed, ”The dynamism of the injunction, by itself, in one country or another may not, however, be sufficient to protect copyright owners. There is an imminent need to evolve a global consensus in this regard.” [Para 16]

The judgment comes in response to a suit filed by well-established Hollywood Studios against various websites that permit unauthorized viewing, streaming, accessing, and downloading of their content. The Court recognized the immediate and severe monetary loss that can occur from piracy and emphasized the need for innovative remedies to keep pace with technological advancements.

In a strong message against internet piracy, the Court stated, ”As innovation in technology continues, remedies to be granted also ought to be calibrated by Courts.” [Para 19]

The decision includes an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants from any manner of streaming, reproducing, distributing, or communicating the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted content, including future works. ISPs were directed to block said websites, and Domain Name Registrars were ordered to lock and suspend domain names, providing details to Plaintiffs.

The Court also referred to a recent Bombay High Court decision in Applause Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. V. Meta Platforms Inc., emphasizing the need for dynamic injunctions that extend to future content.

This judgment reflects a comprehensive approach to combating internet piracy, recognizing the dynamic nature of infringement, and providing a robust legal framework to protect copyright owners.

Date of decision: 9th August, 2023

 

 UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC.  AND ORS. vs DOTMOVIES.BABY AND ORS.

Latest Legal News