Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“An Imminent Need to Evolve a Global Consensus”: Delhi Court Issues ‘Dynamic  Injunction’ Against Internet Piracy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision aimed at combating internet piracy, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice PRATHIBA M. SINGH, has issued a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’ against rogue websites involved in unauthorized streaming, reproduction, and distribution of copyrighted content.

Highlighting the global issue of piracy, the Court observed, ”The dynamism of the injunction, by itself, in one country or another may not, however, be sufficient to protect copyright owners. There is an imminent need to evolve a global consensus in this regard.” [Para 16]

The judgment comes in response to a suit filed by well-established Hollywood Studios against various websites that permit unauthorized viewing, streaming, accessing, and downloading of their content. The Court recognized the immediate and severe monetary loss that can occur from piracy and emphasized the need for innovative remedies to keep pace with technological advancements.

In a strong message against internet piracy, the Court stated, ”As innovation in technology continues, remedies to be granted also ought to be calibrated by Courts.” [Para 19]

The decision includes an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants from any manner of streaming, reproducing, distributing, or communicating the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted content, including future works. ISPs were directed to block said websites, and Domain Name Registrars were ordered to lock and suspend domain names, providing details to Plaintiffs.

The Court also referred to a recent Bombay High Court decision in Applause Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. V. Meta Platforms Inc., emphasizing the need for dynamic injunctions that extend to future content.

This judgment reflects a comprehensive approach to combating internet piracy, recognizing the dynamic nature of infringement, and providing a robust legal framework to protect copyright owners.

Date of decision: 9th August, 2023

 

 UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC.  AND ORS. vs DOTMOVIES.BABY AND ORS.

Latest Legal News