Inadequate Explanation Under Section 313 CrPC Cannot Be Foundation For Conviction If Prosecution Fails To Prove Case: Allahabad High Court No-Confidence Motion In Housing Societies Fails If 2/3 Majority Not Met; Fractions In Voting Threshold Cannot Be Rounded Down: Bombay High Court Successor Rent Controller Cannot Re-Appreciate Evidence Or Act As Appellate Court Under Review Jurisdiction: Delhi High Court Restores Eviction Order Article 21 Overrides PMLA Section 45 Rigors In Cases Of Unduly Long Incarceration Without Trial: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail To SSC Scam ‘Middleman’ Unregistered Family Partition Deed Recording Past Oral Arrangement Doesn't Require Compulsory Registration: Gujarat High Court Private Banks Acting As Authorised Dealers Under FEMA Amenable To Writ Jurisdiction; Can Refuse Transactions For 'Sanctions-Related' Concerns: Gauhati High Court Non-Examination Of Investigating Officer Not Fatal To Prosecution Case If Eyewitness Testimony Is Credible & Trustworthy: Jharkhand High Court Mere Denial Of Signature Insufficient When Execution Is Proved Through Endorsements: Karnataka High Court Restores Specific Performance Decree Sectarianism Claims Can't Discredit Reliable Testimony Of Child Sexual Abuse Victim: Kerala High Court Upholds Madrassa Teacher's Conviction State Must Prove Specific 'Public Interest' To Exempt Projects From Social Impact Assessment Under Section 10A Land Acquisition Act: Telangana High Court Or 2 Rule 2 CPC |Failure To Seek Specific Performance In Earlier Injunction Suit Bars Subsequent Claim; Readiness & Willingness Must Be Continuous: Madras High Court Exoneration In Departmental Proceedings Does Not Result In Automatic Discharge In Criminal Case: Orissa High Court History Sheet Can Be Opened On 'Reasonable Belief' Even Without Conviction, But Must Be Reviewed After 7 Years Of Good Conduct: Rajasthan High Court

“An Imminent Need to Evolve a Global Consensus”: Delhi Court Issues ‘Dynamic  Injunction’ Against Internet Piracy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision aimed at combating internet piracy, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice PRATHIBA M. SINGH, has issued a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’ against rogue websites involved in unauthorized streaming, reproduction, and distribution of copyrighted content.

Highlighting the global issue of piracy, the Court observed, ”The dynamism of the injunction, by itself, in one country or another may not, however, be sufficient to protect copyright owners. There is an imminent need to evolve a global consensus in this regard.” [Para 16]

The judgment comes in response to a suit filed by well-established Hollywood Studios against various websites that permit unauthorized viewing, streaming, accessing, and downloading of their content. The Court recognized the immediate and severe monetary loss that can occur from piracy and emphasized the need for innovative remedies to keep pace with technological advancements.

In a strong message against internet piracy, the Court stated, ”As innovation in technology continues, remedies to be granted also ought to be calibrated by Courts.” [Para 19]

The decision includes an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants from any manner of streaming, reproducing, distributing, or communicating the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted content, including future works. ISPs were directed to block said websites, and Domain Name Registrars were ordered to lock and suspend domain names, providing details to Plaintiffs.

The Court also referred to a recent Bombay High Court decision in Applause Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. V. Meta Platforms Inc., emphasizing the need for dynamic injunctions that extend to future content.

This judgment reflects a comprehensive approach to combating internet piracy, recognizing the dynamic nature of infringement, and providing a robust legal framework to protect copyright owners.

Date of decision: 9th August, 2023

 

 UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC.  AND ORS. vs DOTMOVIES.BABY AND ORS.

Latest Legal News