Limitation Act | Litigant Cannot Be Punished For Court's Own Docket Load: J&K High Court Illicit Affair Alone Cannot Make a Man Guilty of Abetting Suicide: Supreme Court Quashes Charge Under Section 306 IPC Landlord Cannot Be Punished for Slowness of Courts: Supreme Court on Bonafide Need in Eviction Suits Expect States To Enact Laws Regulating Unlicensed Money Lenders Charging Exorbitant Interest Contrary To 'Damdupat': Supreme Court Accused Who Skips Lok Adalat After Seeking It, Then Cries 'Prejudice', Cannot Claim Apprehension of Denial of Justice: Madras High Court Refuse To Transfer Case IO Cannot Act Without Prior Sanction: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail, Flags Procedural Lapse in Religious Conversion Case Electricity Board Strictly Liable For Unprotected Transformer, 7-Year-Old Cannot Be Guilty Of Contributory Negligence: Allahabad High Court POCSO Conviction Can't Stand For Offence Not Charged: Delhi High Court Member of Unlawful Assembly Cannot Escape Conviction By Claiming He Only Carried a Lathi and Struck No One: Allahabad High Court Jurisdiction Cannot Be Founded On Casual Or Incidental Facts If Not Have A Direct Nexus With The Lis: : Delhi High Court Clause Stating Disputes "Can" Be Settled By Arbitration Is Not A Binding Arbitration Agreement: Supreme Court State Cannot Plead Helplessness Against Sand Mafia; Supreme Court Warns Of Paramilitary Deployment, Complete Mining Ban In MP & Rajasthan Authority Cannot Withdraw Subsidy Citing Non-Compliance When It Ignored Repeated Requests For Inspection: Supreme Court Out-of-State SC/ST/OBC Candidates Cannot Claim Rajasthan's Reservation Benefits in NEET PG Counselling: Rajasthan High Court Supreme Court Upholds Haryana's Regularisation Of Qualified Ad Hoc Staff As 'One-Time Measure', Strikes Down Futuristic Cut-Offs

“An Imminent Need to Evolve a Global Consensus”: Delhi Court Issues ‘Dynamic  Injunction’ Against Internet Piracy

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark decision aimed at combating internet piracy, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Justice PRATHIBA M. SINGH, has issued a ‘Dynamic+ injunction’ against rogue websites involved in unauthorized streaming, reproduction, and distribution of copyrighted content.

Highlighting the global issue of piracy, the Court observed, ”The dynamism of the injunction, by itself, in one country or another may not, however, be sufficient to protect copyright owners. There is an imminent need to evolve a global consensus in this regard.” [Para 16]

The judgment comes in response to a suit filed by well-established Hollywood Studios against various websites that permit unauthorized viewing, streaming, accessing, and downloading of their content. The Court recognized the immediate and severe monetary loss that can occur from piracy and emphasized the need for innovative remedies to keep pace with technological advancements.

In a strong message against internet piracy, the Court stated, ”As innovation in technology continues, remedies to be granted also ought to be calibrated by Courts.” [Para 19]

The decision includes an ex parte ad interim injunction restraining the Defendants from any manner of streaming, reproducing, distributing, or communicating the Plaintiffs’ copyrighted content, including future works. ISPs were directed to block said websites, and Domain Name Registrars were ordered to lock and suspend domain names, providing details to Plaintiffs.

The Court also referred to a recent Bombay High Court decision in Applause Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. V. Meta Platforms Inc., emphasizing the need for dynamic injunctions that extend to future content.

This judgment reflects a comprehensive approach to combating internet piracy, recognizing the dynamic nature of infringement, and providing a robust legal framework to protect copyright owners.

Date of decision: 9th August, 2023

 

 UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS LLC.  AND ORS. vs DOTMOVIES.BABY AND ORS.

Latest Legal News