SARFAESI Act | Sale Certificate Cannot Be Issued In Favour Of A Third-Party Nominee Who Was Not The Auction Bidder: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Auction Sale Conducted In Violation Of Mandatory Rules And Subsisting Restraint Order Is Vitiated In Law: Supreme Court Recovery Of Alleged Overpayment From A Separate, Unrelated Contract Without Notice Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Supreme Court IBC | Adjudicating Authority Has Power To Recall CIRP Admission Order If It Was Obtained Through Fraud Or Collusion: Supreme Court Section 138 NI Act | Presumption Of Service Is Attracted Once Notice Is Dispatched To Correct Address Of Drawer: Supreme Court Operation Of Hookah Bars In Restaurants Constitutes Violation Of Rule 4(3) Of COTPA Rules: Allahabad High Court High Court Cannot Recall Order Passed On Merits Even If Passed Ex-Parte: Bombay High Court Administrative Authorities Cannot Pass Orders Having Civil Consequences Without Meaningful Consideration Of The Affected Employee’s Response: Allahabad High Court Discharge Application Cannot Be Converted Into A 'Mini-Trial' To Assess Evidentiary Sufficiency: Andhra Pradesh High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Allegations Are Falsified By Documents Annexed To Plaint Or Based On Non-Existent Law: Bombay High Court Police Cannot Interfere In Pending Civil Disputes Or Act As Arbitrators In Private Property Conflicts: Andhra Pradesh High Court Contract For Personal Services Between Doctor And Hospital Is Determinable And Not Specifically Enforceable: Calcutta High Court Allegations Of Sexual Offences Cannot Be Quashed Based On Contradictory Evidence Requiring Mini-Trial: Delhi High Court PMLA Adjudication | Failure To Expressly Discuss Every Submission In Written Synopsis Does Not Vitiate Order Under Principles Of Natural Justice: Karnataka High Court Prolonged Separation Of Sixteen Years Constitutes Cruelty Under Special Marriage Act: Kerala High Court Grants Divorce Order XII Rule 6 CPC | Decree Of Possession Can Be Granted On Admissions Even If Relationship Of Landlord-Tenant Is Disputed: Delhi High Court Non-Framing Of Issues Under Order XIV CPC Does Not Vitiate Trial Unless Prejudice Is Proved: Madras High Court Order 47 Rule 1 CPC | Review Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked To Cure Failure To Produce Evidence That Was Within Knowledge Of Applicant: Madhya Pradesh High Court Codicil To A Will Must Be Proved Like A Will; Propounder Must Remove All Suspicious Circumstances: Punjab & Haryana High Court Mere Lodging Of Section 498-A IPC Case Not Cruelty: Telangana High Court Sets Aside Divorce Decree Order XVII Rule 3 CPC | Power To Dismiss Suit For Default Of Evidence Is Drastic And Must Be Exercised Sparingly: Punjab & Haryana High Court

An acquittal in a criminal trial has no relevance on disciplinary proceedings – SC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Schedule IV of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 – Dismissal from service  -   Respondent was driving the bus - met with an accident with a jeep coming from the opposite direction - resulted in death of four passengers on the spot and six passengers were seriously injured -  prosecuted - acquitted – Disciplinary action - dismissed from service - challenged the order of dismissal before the Labour Court - upheld the order of dismissal - revision to the Industrial Tribunal - considering the acquittal of the respondent in criminal proceedings - held -order of dismissal is disproportionate to the misconduct proved -  directed his reinstatement without back wages but with continuity of service – appellant feeling aggrieved  preferred writ petition - High Court dismissed the writ petition - directed appellant to pay to the respondent back wages – Appellant feeling dissatisfied preferred appeal – Apex Court held - the standards of proof are so different, an acquittal in a criminal trial has no bearing or relevance on disciplinary proceedings - without regard to the specific nature of the misconduct, it cannot be said that the dismissal of the respondent was based solely on minor or technical misconduct - the order of dismissal passed by the disciplinary authority upheld – Appeal Allowed. 

D.D: - January 03, 2022 

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation  Versus Dilip Uttam Jayabhay 

Latest Legal News