Dismissal Of Suit For Default Doesn't Bar Fresh Partition Suit As Cause Of Action Is Recurring; Second Rejection Of Plaint Application Barred By Res Judicata: Telangana High Court Married Daughter Entitled To Appointment As Fair Price Shop Dealer On Compassionate Grounds; Marital Status No Bar: Allahabad High Court Finding Of Title Cannot Be Recorded In Injunction Simpliciter Suit Absent Specific Pleadings & Issues: Andhra Pradesh High Court Conviction Not A Condition Precedent For Confiscation Of Vehicle Used In Forest Offence: Bombay High Court Advocate’s Professional Call To Client No Proof Of Conspiracy; Sterling Evidence Like CCTV Can Justify Quashing FIR: Gujarat High Court Revenue Entries Changed Without Notifying Affected Parties Are Void; High Court Can Upset Perverse Findings In Second Appeal: Himachal Pradesh HC Mandatory Injunction For Removing Sunshades Or Closing Windows Cannot Be Granted If No Encroachment Is Proved: Karnataka High Court Employer Cannot Resume Work Through Third Parties Until 30-Day Period For Contractor’s Post-Termination Compliance Expires: Madras High Court Circumstantial Chain Fails If Prosecution Doesn't Rule Out Accidental Death: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Two In Murder Case Wife’s Status As Practicing Lawyer Or Professional Qualification No Absolute Bar To Grant Of Interim Maintenance: Orissa High Court Legally Wedded Wife And Second Wife Entitled To Equal Share In Family Pension If Second Wife Was Nominated & Cared For Deceased: Andhra Pradesh High Court Specific Performance Suit Filed At The Fag End Of Limitation Reflects Lack Of Readiness And Willingness: Supreme Court Specific Performance Cannot Be Granted If Plaintiff Fails To Prove Financial Readiness At Relevant Time Of Transaction: Supreme Court MACT |Just Compensation For Deceased Professional Students Must Reflect Future Career Trajectory: Supreme Court Stationary Vehicle Parked At Night Without Warning Signs Poses Evident Hazard; SC Refuses To Reduce Compensation For CA Student’s Death Motor Accident Claims: 100% Loss Of Earning Capacity To Be Considered If Amputation Prevents Manual Worker From Pursuing Sole Avocation: Supreme Court Substantive Amendments Rendering Land Transfers 'Void' Are Prospective; Cannot Invalidate Decades-Old Sale Deeds: Supreme Court Registered Sale Deed Carries Formidable Presumption Of Genuineness; Minor Witness Discrepancies Cannot Invalidate Decades-Old Document: Supreme Court

Allegations against the husband of having an illicit relationship and fathering a child with another woman – Mental Cruelty - Karnataka High Court

06 September 2024 5:30 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has granted divorce to an appellant, SRI.K.MURTHY, based on allegations of cruelty inflicted upon him by his spouse. The bench, comprising of THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE and THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, delivered the judgment which underscores the importance of mental cruelty as a ground for dissolution of marriage.

The court observed, “The fact that the wife has lodged a complaint against the husband is very much admitted in the pleading as well as in the evidence. However, the said case is still pending consideration. This Court is not in a position to give any finding on the correctness or otherwise against the allegations levelled in the said complaint filed by the wife. However, what has to be noticed is that the wife in paragraph 10 of the statement of objections, levelled against the husband that he is having an illicit relationship with a lady by the name Madhumitha.”

The judgment delves into the conduct of the wife, highlighting instances of baseless and reckless allegations, refusal to withdraw complaints, and a rift between the couple. The court emphasized that the wife’s actions led to mental agony and could be construed as cruelty. The bench declared, “This fact has not been appreciated by the Family Court at all. Though the husband has not based the petition on the premise that such an allegation is made by the wife prior to the filing of the petition, The statement of objections filed by the wife as well as the cross-examination on behalf of the wife would indicate that the wife raised this issue even prior to the filing of the petition.”

The judgment also refers to earlier legal decisions that underscore the significance of mental cruelty in matrimonial cases. The court set aside the Family Court’s judgment and decree, granting the husband’s petition for dissolution of marriage. Alimony and maintenance issues were reserved for separate consideration.

This verdict reinforces the notion that mental cruelty can be equally compelling grounds for divorce as physical cruelty. It also serves as a reminder that false allegations and baseless accusations can have profound impacts on marital relationships.

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2023

SRI.K.MURTHY, vs SMT.V.KALAIVANI,

Latest Legal News