Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Allegations against the husband of having an illicit relationship and fathering a child with another woman – Mental Cruelty - Karnataka High Court

06 September 2024 5:30 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has granted divorce to an appellant, SRI.K.MURTHY, based on allegations of cruelty inflicted upon him by his spouse. The bench, comprising of THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE and THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, delivered the judgment which underscores the importance of mental cruelty as a ground for dissolution of marriage.

The court observed, “The fact that the wife has lodged a complaint against the husband is very much admitted in the pleading as well as in the evidence. However, the said case is still pending consideration. This Court is not in a position to give any finding on the correctness or otherwise against the allegations levelled in the said complaint filed by the wife. However, what has to be noticed is that the wife in paragraph 10 of the statement of objections, levelled against the husband that he is having an illicit relationship with a lady by the name Madhumitha.”

The judgment delves into the conduct of the wife, highlighting instances of baseless and reckless allegations, refusal to withdraw complaints, and a rift between the couple. The court emphasized that the wife’s actions led to mental agony and could be construed as cruelty. The bench declared, “This fact has not been appreciated by the Family Court at all. Though the husband has not based the petition on the premise that such an allegation is made by the wife prior to the filing of the petition, The statement of objections filed by the wife as well as the cross-examination on behalf of the wife would indicate that the wife raised this issue even prior to the filing of the petition.”

The judgment also refers to earlier legal decisions that underscore the significance of mental cruelty in matrimonial cases. The court set aside the Family Court’s judgment and decree, granting the husband’s petition for dissolution of marriage. Alimony and maintenance issues were reserved for separate consideration.

This verdict reinforces the notion that mental cruelty can be equally compelling grounds for divorce as physical cruelty. It also serves as a reminder that false allegations and baseless accusations can have profound impacts on marital relationships.

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2023

SRI.K.MURTHY, vs SMT.V.KALAIVANI,

Latest Legal News