Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

Allegations against the husband of having an illicit relationship and fathering a child with another woman – Mental Cruelty - Karnataka High Court

06 September 2024 5:30 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has granted divorce to an appellant, SRI.K.MURTHY, based on allegations of cruelty inflicted upon him by his spouse. The bench, comprising of THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE and THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, delivered the judgment which underscores the importance of mental cruelty as a ground for dissolution of marriage.

The court observed, “The fact that the wife has lodged a complaint against the husband is very much admitted in the pleading as well as in the evidence. However, the said case is still pending consideration. This Court is not in a position to give any finding on the correctness or otherwise against the allegations levelled in the said complaint filed by the wife. However, what has to be noticed is that the wife in paragraph 10 of the statement of objections, levelled against the husband that he is having an illicit relationship with a lady by the name Madhumitha.”

The judgment delves into the conduct of the wife, highlighting instances of baseless and reckless allegations, refusal to withdraw complaints, and a rift between the couple. The court emphasized that the wife’s actions led to mental agony and could be construed as cruelty. The bench declared, “This fact has not been appreciated by the Family Court at all. Though the husband has not based the petition on the premise that such an allegation is made by the wife prior to the filing of the petition, The statement of objections filed by the wife as well as the cross-examination on behalf of the wife would indicate that the wife raised this issue even prior to the filing of the petition.”

The judgment also refers to earlier legal decisions that underscore the significance of mental cruelty in matrimonial cases. The court set aside the Family Court’s judgment and decree, granting the husband’s petition for dissolution of marriage. Alimony and maintenance issues were reserved for separate consideration.

This verdict reinforces the notion that mental cruelty can be equally compelling grounds for divorce as physical cruelty. It also serves as a reminder that false allegations and baseless accusations can have profound impacts on marital relationships.

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2023

SRI.K.MURTHY, vs SMT.V.KALAIVANI,

Similar News