MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Allegations against the husband of having an illicit relationship and fathering a child with another woman – Mental Cruelty - Karnataka High Court

06 September 2024 5:30 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Karnataka High Court has granted divorce to an appellant, SRI.K.MURTHY, based on allegations of cruelty inflicted upon him by his spouse. The bench, comprising of THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE and THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE, delivered the judgment which underscores the importance of mental cruelty as a ground for dissolution of marriage.

The court observed, “The fact that the wife has lodged a complaint against the husband is very much admitted in the pleading as well as in the evidence. However, the said case is still pending consideration. This Court is not in a position to give any finding on the correctness or otherwise against the allegations levelled in the said complaint filed by the wife. However, what has to be noticed is that the wife in paragraph 10 of the statement of objections, levelled against the husband that he is having an illicit relationship with a lady by the name Madhumitha.”

The judgment delves into the conduct of the wife, highlighting instances of baseless and reckless allegations, refusal to withdraw complaints, and a rift between the couple. The court emphasized that the wife’s actions led to mental agony and could be construed as cruelty. The bench declared, “This fact has not been appreciated by the Family Court at all. Though the husband has not based the petition on the premise that such an allegation is made by the wife prior to the filing of the petition, The statement of objections filed by the wife as well as the cross-examination on behalf of the wife would indicate that the wife raised this issue even prior to the filing of the petition.”

The judgment also refers to earlier legal decisions that underscore the significance of mental cruelty in matrimonial cases. The court set aside the Family Court’s judgment and decree, granting the husband’s petition for dissolution of marriage. Alimony and maintenance issues were reserved for separate consideration.

This verdict reinforces the notion that mental cruelty can be equally compelling grounds for divorce as physical cruelty. It also serves as a reminder that false allegations and baseless accusations can have profound impacts on marital relationships.

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF JULY, 2023

SRI.K.MURTHY, vs SMT.V.KALAIVANI,

Latest Legal News