Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

"Allahabad High Court Grants Probation in 24-Year-Old Assault Case: Emphasizes on Reform over Punishment"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment emphasizing the principles of reformative justice, the Allahabad High Court's Lucknow Bench has modified the sentence of three appellants in a two-decade-old assault case. Justice Shamim Ahmed, presiding over the matter, underscored the essence of the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, stating, "The object of criminal law is more to reform the individual offender than to punish him."

The case, which dates back to the year 2000, involved a property dispute leading to a physical assault. The appellants, Rajendra Yadav and others, were convicted under Section 323/34 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C.) by the trial court and sentenced to one year of imprisonment. Challenging this decision, the appellants moved the High Court under Section 374 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.).

In a noteworthy observation, Justice Ahmed referred to the rulings of the Supreme Court in cases like Mohd. Hashim Vs. State of U.P. and Ratan Lal vs State of Punjab. The court noted, "The Act is a milestone in the progress of the modern liberal trend of reform in the field of penology." This reflects a shift towards understanding the circumstances and character of the offender rather than solely focusing on the punitive aspects of the law.

The defense argued for the application of probation, citing the delay in the trial and the absence of any further criminal antecedents against the appellants. The court, acknowledging these factors and the age of the case, decided to extend the benefits of the Probation of Offenders Act. The appellants are directed to file two sureties each along with their personal bonds and an undertaking to maintain peace and good behavior for a period of one year.

This judgment reinforces the judiciary's role in balancing the scales of justice with a humanizing approach, considering the broader social implications of imprisonment versus the opportunity for rehabilitation and reformation. The court's decision has been welcomed by legal experts as a progressive step in the evolution of the Indian criminal justice system.

Date of Decided : 20-03-2024

RAJENDRA YADAV AND OTHERS Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Similar News