MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Allahabad High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Mental Cruelty and Breakdown of Marriage

06 September 2024 5:15 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has granted a divorce decree to the appellant, Ravindra Pratap Yadav, on the grounds of mental cruelty and a complete breakdown of the marriage. The judgment was delivered by Justice Suneet Kumar and Justice Rajendra Kumar-IV.

The case pertained to a divorce petition filed by Ravindra Pratap Yadav under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the dismissal order passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi. The appellant alleged mental cruelty, long desertion, and a divorce agreement reached in a community Panchayat.

According to the appellant's case, serious problems arose in the marriage shortly after the "Gauna" ceremony. The respondent, Smt. Asha Devi, refused to live with him as his wife and displayed apathy and inhuman conduct. The appellant made several attempts to reconcile, but the respondent's behavior remained unchanged. The appellant further claimed that the respondent had entered into a second marriage with another person. Based on these allegations, the appellant sought a divorce decree.

The court below dismissed the case, citing the lack of admissible evidence and the absence of proof regarding the respondent's second marriage. However, the High Court, after examining the uncontroverted evidence presented by the appellant, criticized the lower court's hyper-technical approach and held that the conduct of the respondent amounted to mental cruelty.

The High Court referred to previous judgments and observed that denying a spouse sexual intercourse without sufficient reason itself amounts to mental cruelty. It further enumerated illustrations of mental cruelty, emphasizing that a sustained course of abusive and humiliating treatment, indifference, neglect, and refusal to have intercourse without valid reason can lead to mental cruelty.

The High Court concluded that the appellant had established a case of mental cruelty and a complete breakdown of marriage. Accordingly, it set aside the impugned order of the Family Court and granted the divorce decree to the appellant.

The judgment highlights the importance of considering the overall conduct and effects on mental health in cases of alleged mental cruelty. It emphasizes that a spouse cannot be compelled to continue a marital relationship if it has ceased to exist in reality.

D.D.:- 16.05.2023

Ravindra Pratap Yadav vs Smt. Asha Devi And Others

Latest Legal News