Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Allahabad High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Mental Cruelty and Breakdown of Marriage

06 September 2024 5:15 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has granted a divorce decree to the appellant, Ravindra Pratap Yadav, on the grounds of mental cruelty and a complete breakdown of the marriage. The judgment was delivered by Justice Suneet Kumar and Justice Rajendra Kumar-IV.

The case pertained to a divorce petition filed by Ravindra Pratap Yadav under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the dismissal order passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi. The appellant alleged mental cruelty, long desertion, and a divorce agreement reached in a community Panchayat.

According to the appellant's case, serious problems arose in the marriage shortly after the "Gauna" ceremony. The respondent, Smt. Asha Devi, refused to live with him as his wife and displayed apathy and inhuman conduct. The appellant made several attempts to reconcile, but the respondent's behavior remained unchanged. The appellant further claimed that the respondent had entered into a second marriage with another person. Based on these allegations, the appellant sought a divorce decree.

The court below dismissed the case, citing the lack of admissible evidence and the absence of proof regarding the respondent's second marriage. However, the High Court, after examining the uncontroverted evidence presented by the appellant, criticized the lower court's hyper-technical approach and held that the conduct of the respondent amounted to mental cruelty.

The High Court referred to previous judgments and observed that denying a spouse sexual intercourse without sufficient reason itself amounts to mental cruelty. It further enumerated illustrations of mental cruelty, emphasizing that a sustained course of abusive and humiliating treatment, indifference, neglect, and refusal to have intercourse without valid reason can lead to mental cruelty.

The High Court concluded that the appellant had established a case of mental cruelty and a complete breakdown of marriage. Accordingly, it set aside the impugned order of the Family Court and granted the divorce decree to the appellant.

The judgment highlights the importance of considering the overall conduct and effects on mental health in cases of alleged mental cruelty. It emphasizes that a spouse cannot be compelled to continue a marital relationship if it has ceased to exist in reality.

D.D.:- 16.05.2023

Ravindra Pratap Yadav vs Smt. Asha Devi And Others

Latest Legal News