Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

Allahabad High Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Mental Cruelty and Breakdown of Marriage

06 September 2024 5:15 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has granted a divorce decree to the appellant, Ravindra Pratap Yadav, on the grounds of mental cruelty and a complete breakdown of the marriage. The judgment was delivered by Justice Suneet Kumar and Justice Rajendra Kumar-IV.

The case pertained to a divorce petition filed by Ravindra Pratap Yadav under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the dismissal order passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Varanasi. The appellant alleged mental cruelty, long desertion, and a divorce agreement reached in a community Panchayat.

According to the appellant's case, serious problems arose in the marriage shortly after the "Gauna" ceremony. The respondent, Smt. Asha Devi, refused to live with him as his wife and displayed apathy and inhuman conduct. The appellant made several attempts to reconcile, but the respondent's behavior remained unchanged. The appellant further claimed that the respondent had entered into a second marriage with another person. Based on these allegations, the appellant sought a divorce decree.

The court below dismissed the case, citing the lack of admissible evidence and the absence of proof regarding the respondent's second marriage. However, the High Court, after examining the uncontroverted evidence presented by the appellant, criticized the lower court's hyper-technical approach and held that the conduct of the respondent amounted to mental cruelty.

The High Court referred to previous judgments and observed that denying a spouse sexual intercourse without sufficient reason itself amounts to mental cruelty. It further enumerated illustrations of mental cruelty, emphasizing that a sustained course of abusive and humiliating treatment, indifference, neglect, and refusal to have intercourse without valid reason can lead to mental cruelty.

The High Court concluded that the appellant had established a case of mental cruelty and a complete breakdown of marriage. Accordingly, it set aside the impugned order of the Family Court and granted the divorce decree to the appellant.

The judgment highlights the importance of considering the overall conduct and effects on mental health in cases of alleged mental cruelty. It emphasizes that a spouse cannot be compelled to continue a marital relationship if it has ceased to exist in reality.

D.D.:- 16.05.2023

Ravindra Pratap Yadav vs Smt. Asha Devi And Others

Similar News