Minor in Live-In Relationship Deemed 'Child in Need of Care' by High Court, Protection Ordered Under Juvenile Justice Act Cheque Signed, Sealed, and Bounced – No Escape from Liability: Delhi High Court Right to Defend Includes Right to Inspect Documents: Calcutta High Court Overrules Trial Court's Rejection of Inspection Petition Court Cannot Tinker with Finalized Consolidation Scheme Under Section 42: Punjab and Haryana High Court Remarriage During Appeal Period is Risky, But Not Void: Andhra Pradesh High Court State Cannot Sleep Over Its Rights: Supreme Court Criticizes Odisha Government for Delayed Appeals in Pension Dispute “Both Hands Intact” Rule is a Relic of the Past: Supreme Court Grants MBBS Admission to Disabled Student Terminal Benefits and Family Pension Alone Do Not Bar Compassionate Appointment, But Financial Distress Must Be Proven – Supreme Court Cruelty Under Section 498A IPC Is Not Limited to Dowry Harassment: Supreme Court Right to Speedy Trial Cannot Be Defeated by Delay Tactics: Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Fast-Tracking of Cheque Bounce Case Framing Charges Under Section 193 IPC Without Following Section 340 CrPC is Illegal: Calcutta High Court Doctrine of Part Performance Under Section 53-A TPA Not Applicable Without Proof of Possession: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mere Allegations of False Implication Cannot Override Strong Forensic and Documentary Evidence: Delhi High Court Upholds Conviction in Elderly Woman’s Murder and Robbery Case Applicant Not a Sexual Predator, Relationship Was Consensual: Bombay High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case Fraudulent Transfers to Evade Creditors Cannot Escape Scrutiny: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Execution Petition Gujarat High Court Rules That Contractual Employees Cannot Claim Regularization of Services Serious Charges and Victim’s Suicide Justify Continued Detention: Gauhati High Court Denies Bail in POCSO Case No Permanent Establishment in India, Rejects Notional Income Taxation: Delhi High Court Rules in Favor of Nokia OY Statutory Bail Under NDPS Act Can Be Denied If FSL Report Reaches Court Before Bail Plea": Calcutta High Court Termination After Acquittal is Unjust: Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Shikshan Sevak, Orders 50% Back Wages Denial of MBBS Seat Due to Administrative Lapses is Unacceptable": Andhra Pradesh High Court Awards ₹7 Lakh Compensation to Wronged Student Sessions Court Cannot Reclassify Non-Bailable Offences While Granting Anticipatory Bail: Allahabad High Court

Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case, Emphasizes Prudent Application of the Act in Adolescent Relationships

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Allahabad High Court, represented by Hon’ble Siddharth, J., delivered a judgment on 19th July 2023, granting bail to an accused in a case involving allegations of rape, penetrative sexual assault, and conspiracy under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO Act).

The case titled “Sameer vs. State Of U.P. And 3 Others” saw the applicant, Sameer, seeking bail under Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 26824 of 2023. The victim, aged about 16-17 years, had alleged that she was subjected to the offense of rape in a hotel. However, the defense contended that the relationship between the victim and the accused was consensual.

In a pivotal part of the judgment, the court acknowledged previous judgments emphasizing the importance of judiciously applying the POCSO Act in cases involving adolescents and teenagers in romantic relationships. The court adopted a “bio-social approach” to understand the psychology and relationships of young individuals.

High court stated, “It is crucial to accept the science and psychology of an adolescent and young adulthood... their decision could be impulsive, immature but certainly not sinful or tainted as branded in the F.I.R. or complaint of the informant.”

Drawing upon these principles, the court held that the applicant deserved bail, taking into consideration the uncertainty surrounding the conclusion of the trial, one-sided investigation by the police, and the applicant’s fundamental right to a speedy trial. The court imposed conditions to ensure non-tampering of evidence and attendance at court hearings and directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings.

The judgment has sparked a debate on the application of the POCSO Act and its impact on adolescents involved in romantic relationships. Legal experts lauded the court’s approach to consider the psychological aspects of young individuals and warned against hasty application of the Act in such cases.

This landmark judgment serves as a reminder to the judiciary and law enforcement agencies to carefully evaluate the circumstances of each case, particularly when dealing with adolescent relationships. As the legal community applauds the High Court’s decision, the case sets a precedent for a nuanced and empathetic interpretation of the law concerning young individuals involved in consensual relationships.

Date of Decision: 19th July 2023

Sameer vs State Of U.P.And 3 Others

Similar News