Magistrate's Direction for Police Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC Is Valid; Petitioner Must Await Investigation Outcome: Bombay High Court Dismisses Advocate's Petition as Premature    |     Tribunal’s Compensation Exceeding Claimed Amount Found Just and Fair Under Motor Vehicles Act: No Deduction Errors Warrant Reduction: Gujrat High Court    |     When Two Accused Face Identical Charges, One Cannot Be Convicted While the Other is Acquitted: Supreme Court Emphasizes Principle of Parity in Acquittal    |     Supreme Court Limits Interim Protection for Financial Institutions, Modifies Order on FIRs Filed by Borrowers    |     Kerala High Court Grants Regular Bail in Methamphetamine Case After Delay in Chemical Analysis Report    |     No Sign of Recent Intercourse; No Injury Was Found On Her Body Or Private Parts: Gauhati High Court Acquits Two In Gang Rape Case    |     Failure to Disclose Relationship with Key Stakeholder Led to Setting Aside of Arbitral Award: Gujarat High Court    |     Strict Compliance with UAPA's 7-Day Timeline for Sanctions is Essential:  Supreme Court    |     PAT Teachers Entitled to Regularization from 2014, Quashes Prospective Regularization as Arbitrary: Himachal Pradesh High Court    |     Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Anonymity Protections for Victims in Sensitive Cases: Right to Privacy Prevails Over Right to Information    |     Certified Copy of Will Admissible Under Registration Act, 1908: Allahabad HC Dismisses Plea for Production of Original Will    |     Injuries on Non-Vital Parts Do Not Warrant Conviction for Attempt to Murder: Madhya Pradesh High Court Modifies Conviction Under Section 307 IPC to Section 326 IPC    |     Classification Based on Wikipedia Data Inadmissible; Tribunal to Reassess Using Actual Financial Records: PH High Court Orders Reconsideration of Wage Dispute    |     Mere Delay in Initiation Does Not Justify Reduction of Damages: Jharkhand High Court on Provident Fund Defaults    |     Legatee Can Continue Suit Without Probate, But Decree Contingent on Probate Approval: Orissa High Court    |     An Award that Shocks the Conscience of the Court Cannot Stand, Especially When Public Money is Involved: Calcutta HC Reduces Quantum by Half    |     Trademark Transaction Within Territoriality Principle Subject to Indian Tax Laws: Bombay High Court Dismisses Hindustan Unilever's Petition on Non-Deduction of TDS    |     Concealment of Material Facts Bars Relief under Article 226: SC Reprimands Petitioners for Lack of Bonafides    |     Without Determination of the Will's Genuineness, Partition is Impossible: Supreme Court on Liberal Approach to Pleading Amendments    |     Candidates Cannot Challenge a Selection Process After Participating Without Protest : Delhi High Court Upholds ISRO's Administrative Officer Recruitment    |     Invalid Bank Guarantee Invocation Found Fatal to Recovery Claim: Delhi High Court Dismisses GAIL’s Appeal    |     Adverse Remarks in APAR Recorded Without Objectivity and Likely Motivated by Bias: Delhi High Court Quashes Biased APAR Downgrade of CRPF Officer    |    

Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case: Emphasizes 'Bio-Social Approach' in Adolescent Consent Cases

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark judgment, the Allahabad High Court, under the bench of Justice Siddharth, granted bail in a sensitive case involving the alleged abduction and sexual assault of a minor girl. The case, titled Salman v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 47221 of 2023, was decided on November 6, 2023, and has garnered significant attention due to its nuanced approach towards the consent of minors in romantic relationships, especially under the stringent POCSO Act.

Justice Siddharth, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of a "bio-social approach" in understanding cases involving adolescents and young adults. This approach considers both biological and social factors that influence the behavior and decisions of teenagers, particularly in the context of romantic relationships.

The Court’s decision was influenced by the circumstances of the case where the victim, a minor, appeared to have consented to the relationship with the accused. The Court stated, "It is crucial to accept the science and psychology of an adolescent and young adulthood at this juncture," acknowledging the complex interplay of factors that guide adolescent behavior.

The Court also referenced several precedents, including the landmark cases of S Varadarajan Vs. State of Madras and Atul Mishra vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others, to underline the need for judicial discretion in such cases. Furthermore, the Court laid down stringent conditions for the grant of bail, ensuring the presence of the accused during the trial and preventing any tampering with evidence or witnesses.

This judgment has been seen as a significant step in acknowledging the complexities involved in cases under the POCSO Act, particularly those involving adolescent consent. It highlights the judiciary's evolving perspective on dealing with cases involving young individuals and the need for a more nuanced understanding of their psychological and social dynamics.

The Allahabad High Court's decision is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving similar circumstances, where the context of adolescent relationships and consent must be carefully considered within the legal framework.

Decided on : 06-11-2023

SALMAN VS STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Similar News