Owner Can Avoid Confiscation Under NDPS by Proving Lack of Knowledge or Connivance in Illicit Use of Vehicle: Supreme Court Court is Expert of Experts: High Court Upholds Right to Rebuttal Evidence in Will Dispute Exceptional Circumstances Warrant Use of Inherent Powers to Reduce Sentences in Non-Compoundable Offenses: Supreme Court Execution of Eviction Decree Limited to Suit Premises; Additional Claims Not Permissible: Bombay High Court Only Apprentices Under the 1961 Act Are Excluded from Gratuity – Calcutta High Court Demand for Penalty and Interest Without Following Natural Justice Violates Section 11A of the Central Excise Act: P&H High Court Rajasthan High Court Acquits Bank Manager, Citing "Processing Fee, Not Bribe" in Corruption Case Compensatory Nature of Section 138 NI Act Permits Compounding Even at Revisional Stage: Madras High Court Kerala High Court Quashes GST Demand of Rs. 99 Crore: Faults Adjudicating Authority for Contradictory Findings Section 138 NI Act | Compounding Permitted Even at Revisional Stage with Reduced Fee in Special Circumstances: HP High Court No Renewal, Only Re-Tendering’ – Upholds Railway Board’s MPS License Policy: Delhi High Court Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Second FIR Against Former Minister in Corruption Case Nature of Suit Must Be Determined on Evidence, Not Technical Grounds: Delhi High Court on Rejection of Plaint Economic Offences Must Be Scrutinized to Protect Public Interest:  Allahabad High Court Dismisses Plea to Quash FIR Against Cloud Investment Scheme Company Golden Hour Care Is a Matter of Right, Not Privilege: Supreme Court on Road Accident Victim Treatment Limitation Law | When Once the Time Has Begun to Run, Nothing Stops It: Supreme Court Section 14 of Limitation Act Shields Bona Fide Claimants: SC Validates Arbitration Amid Procedural Delay Time Lost Cannot Be Restored, But Justice Can: Supreme Court Orders Immediate Release of Convict Declared Juvenile Bailable Warrants in Domestic Violence Cases Only in Exceptional Circumstances - Domestic Violence Act Cases Are Primarily Remedial, Not Punitive: Supreme Court

"Allahabad High Court Acquits  in NDPS Case, Citing 'Miserable Failure' of Prosecution to Prove Charges Beyond Reasonable Doubt"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench) acquitted Aasha Ram, who had been convicted under the stringent Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (N.D.P.S. Act). The Court's decision, delivered on March 20, 2024, by Justice Shamim Ahmed, has raised critical questions about the procedural compliance in narcotic cases and the reliability of police testimony.

In 2009, Aasha Ram was arrested alongside Jagram Kewat, with the police claiming recovery of 150 grams of morphine. The prosecution based its case primarily on the testimonies of three police officers, leading to his conviction by the trial court. Ram, however, maintained his innocence, challenging the procedural aspects of his arrest and search.

The High Court, scrutinizing the compliance with the N.D.P.S. Act, especially focused on the mandatory procedures outlined in Sections 50, 55, and 57. Justice Ahmed remarked, "the prosecution has miserably failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt against the appellant." This observation was pivotal in the court's decision to overturn the trial court's judgment.

Significantly, the judgment highlighted the absence of compliance with Section 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act, which mandates that searches be conducted in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or a Magistrate. The court's decision emphasized the safeguards intended to prevent the misuse of powers by law enforcement agencies.

In its deliberation, the court also cited prominent Supreme Court judgments that underscore the importance of procedural safeguards in cases involving stringent punishments, such as those under the N.D.P.S. Act.

This ruling has brought to the forefront the necessity of strict adherence to procedural requirements in narcotic cases, emphasizing the rights of the accused and the responsibilities of law enforcement. The acquittal of Aasha Ram not only highlights judicial scrutiny of narcotic cases but also underscores the need for transparent and accountable policing.

Date of Decided : 20-03-2024

AASHA RAM Vs. STATE OF U.P.

Similar News