Judicial Review Not Negated In Election Matters Where Level Playing Field Is Impaired By Violence: Supreme Court FIR Registration | Prospective Accused Has Locus Standi To Appeal Against Single Judge's Direction: Supreme Court Executing Deed Claiming Disputed Property Not 'False Document' Without Impersonation; Civil Disputes Can't Be Criminalised: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Partition Suit Can Be Transferred To High Court To Avoid Inconsistent Findings With Pending Testamentary Proceedings: Bombay High Court Upgraded Junior High Schools Lose Separate Legal Identity; Recruitment Under 1978 Rules Not Maintainable For Resulting Vacancies: Allahabad High Court Section 370 IPC | Consent Of Victim Is Irrelevant For Proving Trafficking; High Court Sustains Conviction Despite Acquittal Under Section 370A(2) Section 307 IPC | Absence Of Bodily Injury Does Not Exclude Offence If Intention Or Knowledge Is Established From Surrounding Circumstances: Delhi High Court Income Tax Reopening | Assessing Officer Cannot Initiate Reassessment Based On Third-Party Allegations Without Establishing Direct Nexus With Assessee: Gujarat High Court Section 294 CrPC | Non-Examination Of Autopsy Doctor Not Fatal To Prosecution When Post-Mortem Report's Genuineness Is Undisputed: Karnataka High Court Section 25 Arms Act | Mere Custody Without Awareness Not An Offence, 'Conscious Possession' Essential: Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Over Single Live Cartridge Section 20 Prevention Of Corruption Act | Statutory Presumption Cannot Be Triggered Without Proof Of Demand; Mere Recovery Insufficient: Himachal Pradesh High Court Article 227 Constitution of India | High Court Cannot Sit In Appeal Over Findings Of Tribunal Under Supervisory Jurisdiction: Kerala High Court Mere Registration Of Will Does Not Dispense With Requirement To Prove Execution Under Section 68 Evidence Act: Madras High Court Insurance Policy Exclusion | Onus To Prove Suicide Can Be Discharged By Circumstantial Evidence And Unexplained Discrepancies In Medical Records: NCDRC Registration Act | Contested Decree Declaring Pre-Existing Rights By Adverse Possession Does Not Require Compulsory Registration Or Stamp Duty: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 100 Patents Act | Government Empowered To Authorise Manufacture Of Patented Life-Saving Drugs For Non-Commercial Distribution To Patients: Kerala High Court Madras High Court Slaps ₹1 Lakh Cost On Centre Over Botched Prisoner Repatriation Contempt Of Court | Bona Fide Efforts To Verify Credentials Preclude Finding Of 'Wilful Disobedience': Telangana High Court Financial Commissioner Cannot Remand Appointment Of Lambardar Without Finding Perversity In Collector’s Order: Punjab & Haryana High Court Article 226 | High Court Cannot Act As Second Appellate Authority Over Transfer Orders; Judicial Review Permissible Only On Four Limited Grounds: Rajasthan High Court Drugs and Cosmetics Act | Prosecution Must Prove Possession And Lack Of Licence Through Independent Evidence; Failure Of Panch Witnesses Is Fatal: Telangana High Court Section 392 IPC | Appellate Courts Can Reduce Sentence To Period Already Undergone Considering Protracted Litigation And Lack Of Criminal Antecedents: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Allahabad Court Converts Dowry Death Conviction to Culpable Homicide

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


On 12 July 2023, In a significant ruling, the Hon'ble Court converted a dowry death conviction to culpable homicide, bringing relief to the appellant. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J. and Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., highlighted the importance of scrutinizing dying declarations and the distinction between murder and culpable homicide.

The Court observed, "A dying declaration has to be subjected to very close scrutiny, but once it is deemed truthful and reliable, it can form the sole basis for conviction." Emphasizing the reliability of dying declarations, the Court referred to various precedents, including the case of Krishan vs. State of Haryana [(2013) 3 Supreme Court Cases 280].

The case revolved around an allegation that the appellant, accused of setting his wife ablaze, was motivated by a quarrel rather than a dowry demand. The trial court had initially deemed it a case of dowry death. However, the appellant's counsel argued that the dying declaration clearly stated that the wife was set ablaze due to a quarrel with her husband, not because of a dowry demand.

The Court acknowledged the importance of the dying declaration, stating, "The dying declaration made by the deceased would prevail upon the statements of the witnesses and the evidence recorded by the Investigating Officer." The Court further noted that the appellant himself extinguished the fire and promptly admitted the deceased to the hospital.

After a comprehensive examination of the facts, medical evidence, and relevant legal principles, the Court concluded that the appellant had no intention to kill the deceased. Instead, the act fell under the purview of culpable homicide, as outlined in Section 304 Part-I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court held, "The offence would be punishable under Section 304 Part-I IPC because the burn injuries were caused to the deceased by the appellant with the intention to cause bodily injuries likely to cause death."

Allahabad High Court converted the appellant's conviction and reduced the sentence to the period already served. The Court imposed a fine, as prescribed under the law.

Mritunjaya @ Tinku   vs State of U.P.         

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mritunjaya_Vs_State_12July23_All_HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News