MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Allahabad Court Converts Dowry Death Conviction to Culpable Homicide

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 12 July 2023, In a significant ruling, the Hon'ble Court converted a dowry death conviction to culpable homicide, bringing relief to the appellant. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J. and Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., highlighted the importance of scrutinizing dying declarations and the distinction between murder and culpable homicide.

The Court observed, "A dying declaration has to be subjected to very close scrutiny, but once it is deemed truthful and reliable, it can form the sole basis for conviction." Emphasizing the reliability of dying declarations, the Court referred to various precedents, including the case of Krishan vs. State of Haryana [(2013) 3 Supreme Court Cases 280].

The case revolved around an allegation that the appellant, accused of setting his wife ablaze, was motivated by a quarrel rather than a dowry demand. The trial court had initially deemed it a case of dowry death. However, the appellant's counsel argued that the dying declaration clearly stated that the wife was set ablaze due to a quarrel with her husband, not because of a dowry demand.

The Court acknowledged the importance of the dying declaration, stating, "The dying declaration made by the deceased would prevail upon the statements of the witnesses and the evidence recorded by the Investigating Officer." The Court further noted that the appellant himself extinguished the fire and promptly admitted the deceased to the hospital.

After a comprehensive examination of the facts, medical evidence, and relevant legal principles, the Court concluded that the appellant had no intention to kill the deceased. Instead, the act fell under the purview of culpable homicide, as outlined in Section 304 Part-I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court held, "The offence would be punishable under Section 304 Part-I IPC because the burn injuries were caused to the deceased by the appellant with the intention to cause bodily injuries likely to cause death."

Allahabad High Court converted the appellant's conviction and reduced the sentence to the period already served. The Court imposed a fine, as prescribed under the law.

Mritunjaya @ Tinku   vs State of U.P.         

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mritunjaya_Vs_State_12July23_All_HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News