Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

Allahabad Court Converts Dowry Death Conviction to Culpable Homicide

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On 12 July 2023, In a significant ruling, the Hon'ble Court converted a dowry death conviction to culpable homicide, bringing relief to the appellant. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma, J. and Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker, J., highlighted the importance of scrutinizing dying declarations and the distinction between murder and culpable homicide.

The Court observed, "A dying declaration has to be subjected to very close scrutiny, but once it is deemed truthful and reliable, it can form the sole basis for conviction." Emphasizing the reliability of dying declarations, the Court referred to various precedents, including the case of Krishan vs. State of Haryana [(2013) 3 Supreme Court Cases 280].

The case revolved around an allegation that the appellant, accused of setting his wife ablaze, was motivated by a quarrel rather than a dowry demand. The trial court had initially deemed it a case of dowry death. However, the appellant's counsel argued that the dying declaration clearly stated that the wife was set ablaze due to a quarrel with her husband, not because of a dowry demand.

The Court acknowledged the importance of the dying declaration, stating, "The dying declaration made by the deceased would prevail upon the statements of the witnesses and the evidence recorded by the Investigating Officer." The Court further noted that the appellant himself extinguished the fire and promptly admitted the deceased to the hospital.

After a comprehensive examination of the facts, medical evidence, and relevant legal principles, the Court concluded that the appellant had no intention to kill the deceased. Instead, the act fell under the purview of culpable homicide, as outlined in Section 304 Part-I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court held, "The offence would be punishable under Section 304 Part-I IPC because the burn injuries were caused to the deceased by the appellant with the intention to cause bodily injuries likely to cause death."

Allahabad High Court converted the appellant's conviction and reduced the sentence to the period already served. The Court imposed a fine, as prescribed under the law.

Mritunjaya @ Tinku   vs State of U.P.         

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Mritunjaya_Vs_State_12July23_All_HC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News