Non-Production Of Case Property And Missing Link Evidence In Seizure Cases Vitiates Prosecution: Himachal Pradesh High Court Employees Compensation Act | Death Due To Cardiac Arrest During Employment Is An 'Accident' Arising Out Of Stress And Strain Of Duty: J&K High Court Transfer Of Proceedings | Courts Must Issue Fresh Notice To Parties Even If They Had Appeared Before The Transferor Court: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Ex-Parte Award Section 80P(4) IT Act Does Not Deny Deduction To Regional Rural Banks As They Retain The 'Deemed Co-operative Society' Status Under Section 22 RRB Act: Madras High Court Property Purchased In Name Of Child For Family Benefit Is Not A 'Benami Transaction' Under Section 2(9) Of The 1988 Act: Madhya Pradesh High Court Person Without Caveatable Interest Cannot Challenge Will Or Seek Revocation Of Probate: Madras High Court Divorce | Cruelty Must Be Assessed By Cumulative Effect Of Matrimonial Conduct Rather Than Isolated Incidents: Orissa High Court Merely Labeling Insurance Policy As Comprehensive Does Not Create Unlimited Liability: MP High Court Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Plaint Must Be Rejected If Limitation Bar Is Apparent From Face Of Pleadings: Patna High Court Limitation Act | 'Sufficient Cause' Cannot Be Used To Revive Stale Or Dead Claims By State: Orissa High Court Quashes Order Condoning 53-Year Delay Employee Cannot Remain Dormant Like Rip Van Winkle & Awaken At Convenience: Punjab & Haryana High Court Dismisses Stale Service Plea With ₹25K Cost Section 29 NDPS Act | Mere Allegation Of 'Cooperation' Without Specific Overt Acts Cannot Sustain Charge Of Conspiracy: Rajasthan High Court Forest Land Status Does Not Extinguish Private Civil Title: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Decree For Possession Once Admitted In Evidence, Document Cannot Be De-Marked On Grounds Of Insufficiency Of Stamp Duty: Telangana High Court Section 190 BNSS | Mere Presence In Unlawful Assembly With Active Intent Renders Member Vicariously Liable For Homicidal Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Contributory Negligence Under Motor Vehicles Act Cannot Be Inferred Without Cogent Evidence: Telangana High Court Enhances Compensation Motor Vehicles Act | Section 164 Compensation Of Rs. 5 Lakhs Applicable Even To Pending Claims Arising Prior To 2019 Amendment: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consumer Protection Act | Builder Liable To Pay Interest For Delayed Possession Despite Force Majeure Plea If Agreement Executed Post-Outbreak: State Commission

All Possible Efforts to Trace Missing Person Must Be Made - Delhi High Court in Missing Woman Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition filed by Umesh Kumar, regarding the mysterious disappearance of his wife since November 19, 2022. The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Shalinder Kaur, emphasized the importance of exhaustive investigative efforts in such cases.

The petitioner, aggrieved by the police's response to his wife's disappearance, approached the court seeking directions under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India for the production of his missing wife. “The case underscores the crucial role of law enforcement in meticulously tracking missing persons,” remarked Justice Suresh Kumar Kait.

The police registered FIR No.339/2023 under Section 365 IPC after a complaint from the respondent. Despite analyzing call records and conducting local searches, the whereabouts of the missing woman remain unknown. “In light of the aforesaid and since all possible efforts to trace the missing girl have been made and the FIR is pending investigation, we hereby dispose of the present writ petition,” stated the bench in their judgment.

The court has directed the concerned police officials to file a quarterly status report before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate. Any significant development in the case must be promptly communicated to the petitioner.

Representing the petitioner were Ms. Neetu Rai, Mr. Alok Kr. Rai & Ms. Kanchan, while the respondents were represented by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Shivesh Kaushik & Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya.

This case brings into focus the challenges and responsibilities of the police in missing person investigations and the judiciary’s role in ensuring that all possible efforts are made in such sensitive matters.

Date of Decision: November 10, 2023

UMESH KUMAR VS THE N.C.T/GOVT. OF DELHI & ORS. 

Latest Legal News