MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

All Possible Efforts to Trace Missing Person Must Be Made - Delhi High Court in Missing Woman Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition filed by Umesh Kumar, regarding the mysterious disappearance of his wife since November 19, 2022. The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Shalinder Kaur, emphasized the importance of exhaustive investigative efforts in such cases.

The petitioner, aggrieved by the police's response to his wife's disappearance, approached the court seeking directions under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India for the production of his missing wife. “The case underscores the crucial role of law enforcement in meticulously tracking missing persons,” remarked Justice Suresh Kumar Kait.

The police registered FIR No.339/2023 under Section 365 IPC after a complaint from the respondent. Despite analyzing call records and conducting local searches, the whereabouts of the missing woman remain unknown. “In light of the aforesaid and since all possible efforts to trace the missing girl have been made and the FIR is pending investigation, we hereby dispose of the present writ petition,” stated the bench in their judgment.

The court has directed the concerned police officials to file a quarterly status report before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate. Any significant development in the case must be promptly communicated to the petitioner.

Representing the petitioner were Ms. Neetu Rai, Mr. Alok Kr. Rai & Ms. Kanchan, while the respondents were represented by Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Mr. Shivesh Kaushik & Mr. Abhinav Kr. Arya.

This case brings into focus the challenges and responsibilities of the police in missing person investigations and the judiciary’s role in ensuring that all possible efforts are made in such sensitive matters.

Date of Decision: November 10, 2023

UMESH KUMAR VS THE N.C.T/GOVT. OF DELHI & ORS. 

Latest Legal News