Lack Of Boundaries In Sale Deed Not Fatal To Title If Plot Number & Parent Title Are Sufficiently Identifiable: Calcutta High Court Terror Perception Of Underworld Justifies Delay In Invoking MCOCA; Purely Civil Disputes Can Metamorphose Into Criminal Offence: Bombay High Court Identical Wills Executed By Spouses On Same Day Not Necessarily 'Mutual Wills' Restricting Power Of Alienation: Delhi High Court Written Notice Not Mandatory For Revoking Permission Under Section 41 Presidency Small Cause Courts Act: Gujarat High Court Wife Cannot Maintain Complaint Against Husband Under Senior Citizens Act; Not Intended For Spousal Disputes: Karnataka High Court Mere Presence At Scene Or Facilitation Without Intent To Aid Crime Does Not Amount To Abetment: Delhi High Court Offences Under IT Act Punishable With 3 Years Imprisonment Are Bailable Under Section 77B: Kerala High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail In KCA Data Theft Case Premature Release Can't Be Denied Citing Section 435 CrPC If Sentence Under Central Act Is Already Served: Madras High Court Suppression Of Higher Qualification To Secure Job Reserved For Lower Education Is Foundational Fraud, Sympathy Has No Role: Supreme Court MBBS Admissions | Candidate Using NIOS Marks To Meet 50% Eligibility Cannot Claim State Govt School Quota: Orissa High Court High Court Cannot Exercise Article 227 Power To Strike Off Plaint When Remedy Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC Exists: Madras High Court Section 69 IEA | Onus On Propounder To Lead Secondary Evidence & Remove Suspicious Circumstances If Attesting Witnesses Are Dead: Telangana High Court

Advocate committed fraud with court to get bail – Contempt Notice – Allahabad HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


An application filed under Section 439(2) of the Cr.P.C., seeking the cancellation of an order dated 22.3.2022 that had granted bail to the accused-respondent in a criminal case.

Allahabad Court finds that the accused's counsel, Sri Parmanand Gupta, had deliberately styled the bail application as the first bail application, when in fact it was the second, in order to obtain a favorable order from the court.

This fact was noticed by the court, which subsequently issued a show cause notice to Gupta for committing contempt of the court and for playing fraud with the court.

The court noted that Gupta had conducted himself in a manner that was against the Bar Council Rules and professional ethics and had played fraud with the court by concealing the material fact that the accused's first bail application had been rejected by another bench of the court. The court also kept the order dated 22.3.2022 in abeyance and directed the state to arrest the accused-respondent if he had been released on bail.

Finally, the court cancelled the order dated 22.3.2022 and ordered that the accused-respondent be taken into custody. The court also prima facie held Gupta guilty of committing contempt of the court and playing fraud with the court and directed him to reply to the show cause notice within two weeks.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the dignity and integrity of the court and the responsibility of lawyers to adhere to the Bar Council Rules and professional ethics.

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy  vs  Mohd. Rizwan @ Raziwan

Latest Legal News