CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints Minimum Wages Cannot Be Ignored While Determining Just Compensation: Andhra Pradesh High Court Re-Fixes Income of Deceased Mason, Enhances Interest to 7.5% 34 IPC | Common Intention Is Inferred From Manner Of Attack, Weapons Carried And Concerted Conduct: Allahabad High Court Last Date of Section 4 Publication Is Crucial—Error in Date Cannot Depress Market Value: Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Beed Land Acquisition Appeals Order 26 Rule 10-A CPC | Rarest of Rare: When a Mother Denies Her Own Child: Rajasthan High Court Orders DNA Test to Decide Maternity Acquittal Is Not a Passport Back to Uniform: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Dismissal of Constable in NDPS Case Despite Trial Court Verdict Limitation Under Section 468 Cr.P.C. Cannot Be Ignored — But Section 473 Keeps the Door Open in the Interest of Justice: P&H HC Non-Stamping Renders A Document Inadmissible, Not Void – Defect Is Curable Once Duty Is Paid: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Specific Performance MP High Court Upholds Ladli Behna Yojana Criteria; Rules Registration Deadlines and Age Limits Fall Under Executive Domain Criminal Courts Are Not Recovery Agents: Orissa High Court Grants Bail in ₹3.5 Crore Land Fraud Cases Citing Article 21 and Terminal Illness

Advocate committed fraud with court to get bail – Contempt Notice – Allahabad HC

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


An application filed under Section 439(2) of the Cr.P.C., seeking the cancellation of an order dated 22.3.2022 that had granted bail to the accused-respondent in a criminal case.

Allahabad Court finds that the accused's counsel, Sri Parmanand Gupta, had deliberately styled the bail application as the first bail application, when in fact it was the second, in order to obtain a favorable order from the court.

This fact was noticed by the court, which subsequently issued a show cause notice to Gupta for committing contempt of the court and for playing fraud with the court.

The court noted that Gupta had conducted himself in a manner that was against the Bar Council Rules and professional ethics and had played fraud with the court by concealing the material fact that the accused's first bail application had been rejected by another bench of the court. The court also kept the order dated 22.3.2022 in abeyance and directed the state to arrest the accused-respondent if he had been released on bail.

Finally, the court cancelled the order dated 22.3.2022 and ordered that the accused-respondent be taken into custody. The court also prima facie held Gupta guilty of committing contempt of the court and playing fraud with the court and directed him to reply to the show cause notice within two weeks.

This judgment serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the dignity and integrity of the court and the responsibility of lawyers to adhere to the Bar Council Rules and professional ethics.

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy  vs  Mohd. Rizwan @ Raziwan

Latest Legal News