Possession and Part Performance: Stamp Duty Compliance Is Non-Negotiable, Says Delhi High Court Calcutta High Court Declares Disciplinary Action as ‘Shockingly Disproportionate’, Orders Reduction in Rank for Petitioner No Profits, No Deduction — Section 33AC Must Precede 80-I Calculation in Shipping Tax Disputes: Bombay High Court Equity and Merit Must Coexist: Kerala High Court Rules on Regularisation of Temporary Forest Department Employees Lawyers Have No Right to Strike: Madras High Court in Contempt Case Encroachment is like committing a 'dacoity' against public resources: Delhi High Court. High Court Rejects Plea of Kindergarten School Against ESI Contribution Assessment Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Proceedings Citing 'Humanitarian Consideration' After Accused Marries Victim Procedural Delays Do Not Justify Condonation of Delay," Rules Delhi Consumer Commission in National Insurance Case Elements of Section 300 IPC Are Not Made Out: Rajasthan High Court Quashes Murder Conviction in 1987 Beating Case Registrar Cannot Be a Judge of His Own Cause: Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes Amendments MP High Court Upholds Prosecution for Forged Patta: 'Accountability in Public Office is Non-Negotiable Approval Must Be Granted for Altruistic Kidney Donations," Rules Madras High Court Grave Illegality in Appellate Remand: High Court of Rajasthan Orders Reassessment on Merits Commissioner Lacked Authority for Retrospective Cancellation: Punjab & Haryana High Court Restores Educational Trusts' Registrations Intent is Crucial in Violent Crimes: Single Blow with Axe Does Not Imply Attempt to Murder," Rules Madhya Pradesh High Court

Acts Done in Discharge of Official Duty Require Prior Sanction" – Rajasthan High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against SHO

23 December 2024 4:09 PM

By: sayum


The Rajasthan High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings initiated against Dharamveer Singh, a Station House Officer (SHO) at Police Station Masooda, citing the lack of prior sanction required for prosecuting a public servant under Section 197 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC). The judgment underscores the statutory protection afforded to public servants to prevent frivolous prosecutions.

The case originated from an incident on May 22, 2003, when Dharamveer Singh, in his capacity as SHO, arrested Anda and two others for allegedly breaching peace. They were detained overnight and produced before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) the next day, who ordered their release on bail. Anda later filed a complaint accusing Singh of illegal detention and physical abuse, leading to the initiation of criminal proceedings against Singh for offenses under Sections 323, 342, 365, and 504 IPC.

Justice Sudesh Bansal emphasized that the prosecution of a public servant for acts done in the discharge of official duties requires prior sanction from the government under Section 197 CrPC. "The petitioner cannot be prosecuted for acts performed in his official capacity without the requisite sanction," the judgment stated, highlighting the statutory protection intended to shield public servants from baseless allegations.

The court noted that the initial detention of the complainants was lawful and conducted under Section 151 CrPC to prevent the commission of a cognizable offense. The allegations of physical abuse were deemed to be an afterthought, as no complaints were made when the detainees were first produced before the SDM.

The court found that the injury reports and subsequent complaints lacked credibility. "The allegations of abuse and beatings appear to be fabricated and aimed at harassing the petitioner," the judgment observed. It was also highlighted that the Judicial Magistrate erred in taking cognizance without insisting on the mandatory sanction.

The judgment extensively discussed the principles governing the protection of public servants under Section 197 CrPC. It reiterated that acts performed in the discharge of official duties, even if exceeding authority, are protected from prosecution without prior sanction. The court referred to several precedents to underscore this legal principle, including judgments from the Supreme Court and other High Courts.

Justice Sudesh Bansal stated, "The protection under Section 197 CrPC is crucial for ensuring that public servants are not unduly harassed by malicious prosecutions. The absence of sanction renders the cognizance taken by the lower courts unsustainable."

The Rajasthan High Court's decision to quash the criminal proceedings against SHO Dharamveer Singh reinforces the legal safeguards provided to public servants under Section 197 CrPC. The judgment sends a clear message about the necessity of obtaining prior sanction for prosecuting public officials, thereby upholding the integrity of their official functions. This ruling is expected to have significant implications for future cases involving allegations against public servants.

Date of Decision: May 8, 2024

Similar News