Punjab and Haryana High Court Quashes State Election Commission's Cancellation of Panchayat Elections in Punjab J&K High Court Quashes FIR Against Bajaj Allianz, Asserts Insurance Dispute Shouldn’t Be Criminalized Sole Eyewitness's Testimony Insufficient to Sustain Murder Conviction: Madras High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Presumption of Innocence is Strengthened in Acquittal Cases; Appellate Courts Must Respect Trial Court Findings Unless Clearly Perverse: Delhi High Court NDPS | Physical or Virtual Presence of Accused is Mandatory for Extension of Detention Beyond 180 Days: Andhra Pradesh HC Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Welfare Benefits for Construction Workers Due to Model Code of Conduct Section 131 of Electricity Act Does Not Mandate Finalized Transfer Scheme Before Bidding: Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Privatization of UT Chandigarh Electricity Department Revenue Authorities Must Safeguard State Property, Not Indulge in Land Scams: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposed Amendment Clarifies, Not Changes, Cause of Action: High Court of Jharkhand emphasizing the necessity of amendment for determining real questions in controversy. EWS Candidates Selected on Merit Should Not Be Counted Towards Reserved Quota: P&H High Court Finance Act 2022 Amendments Upheld: Supreme Court Validates Retrospective Customs Authority for DRI Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute A Criminal Offense Unless Fraudulent Intent Exists From The Start: Delhi High Court Anticipatory Bail Not Intended As A Shield To Avoid Lawful Proceedings In Cases Of Serious Crimes: Allahabad High Court Rajasthan High Court Grants Bail in Light of Prolonged Detention and Delays in Trial U/S 480 BNSS Provision Bombay High Court Orders Disclosure of Candidates' Marks in Public Recruitment Process: Promotes Transparency under RTI Act Maintenance | Father's Duty to Support Daughters Until Self-Sufficiency or Marriage: Karnataka High Court Designation of Arbitration 'Venue' as 'Seat' Confers Exclusive Jurisdiction: Supreme Court Rules in Dubai Arbitration Case Corporate Veil Shields Company Assets from Partition as Joint Family Property: Madras High Court Principal Employers Liable for ESI Contributions for Contract Workers, But Assessments Must Be Fair and Account for Eligibility: Kerala High Court Government Entities Must be Treated Equally to Private Parties in Arbitration Proceedings: Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Resumption of Disciplinary Inquiry Against Storekeeper in Ration Misappropriation Case

Accused's Further Detention Unnecessary: Kerala HC Grants Bail in NDPS Case Involving Methamphetamine Possession

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgement, the Kerala High Court today granted bail to Muhammed Musthafa, accused of possessing 36.740 grams of Methamphetamine, initially alleged as MDMA. Justice C.S. Dias observed, "the petitioner's further detention is unnecessary," highlighting the completion of the investigation and the absence of criminal history.

Legal Point: The key legal point in this case revolves around the bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, concerning an offence under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The pivot of the judgment was the reclassification of the seized substance from MDMA to Methamphetamine, altering its legal and punitive implications.

Facts and Issues: Musthafa was arrested on February 2, 2024, for allegedly possessing MDMA for sale. However, the subsequent chemical analysis dated March 27, 2024, reclassified the substance as Methamphetamine. The main issues were whether the change in classification of the substance and the lack of criminal antecedents justified the grant of bail.

Substance Reclassification: The Court noted the change in the classification of the seized substance from MDMA to Methamphetamine, placing it in the category of an intermediate quantity under the NDPS Act.

Lack of Criminal History: Emphasizing the petitioner’s clean antecedents, Justice Dias remarked, "Indisputably, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents."

Investigation Completion: Considering the completion of the investigation and the recovery of the substance, the Court found continued detention unnecessary.

Bail Conditions: The Court set specific bail conditions, including regular appearance before the Investigating Officer, non-interference with evidence or witnesses, a ban on committing offences while on bail, and surrendering of passport.

Sushila Aggarwal Reference: Citing the Supreme Court judgment in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), the Court maintained the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate and make recoveries, even while the petitioner is on bail.

Decision Granting bail, the Court directed Musthafa to be released upon executing a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two solvent sureties and complying with the stipulated conditions.

Date of Decision: April 1, 2024

Muhammed Musthafa vs State of Kerala

 

Similar News