Contradictions In Eyewitness Accounts And Suppression Of Crucial Evidence Weaken The Prosecution's Case: Telangana High Court High Court of Sikkim Sets Aside Trial Court’s Decision on Maintainability of Suit: Preliminary Issues Must Be Purely of Law Courts Must Focus on Substance Over Procedure, Says High Court Writ Petitions Against Civil Court Orders Must Be Under Article 227: Patna High Court Reiterates Jurisdictional Boundaries Kerala High Court Upholds Eviction, Rejects Sub-Tenant's Kudikidappu Claim Contractual Employment Does Not Confer Right to Regularization: Jharkhand High Court Divorced Wife Entitled to Maintenance Under Domestic Violence Act for Past Domestic Violence: Bombay High Court Tenants Cannot Prescribe How Landlords Utilize Their Property: Delhi High Court Validates Eviction Labour Commissioner to Decide Petitioner’s Date of Birth Claim within Three Months, Ensuring Proper Verification and Consideration of Evidence: Uttarakhand High Court Concealment of Health Condition and False Allegations Amount to Cruelty: Gujarat High Court Upholds Divorce Decree Judicial Proceedings Cannot Be Instituted After Four Years: MP High Court in Quashing FIR Against Retired Engineer Orissa High Court Invalidates Lecturer Recruitment Advertisements for Non-Compliance with UGC Standards Public Interest Jurisdiction Not a Substitute for Private Litigation: Karnataka High Court Declines PIL Cognizance under Section 188 IPC is illegal without a public servant’s complaint:Kerala High Court Juvenile Justice Act Prevails Over Recruitment Rules: Madras High Court Rules Juvenile Records Cannot Bar Employment in Police Services" Calcutta High Court Quashes MR Distributorship Selection Due to Irregularities in Godown Compliance and Selection Process Once the driver has established the validity of his license, the insurer cannot escape liability without conclusive proof to the contrary: J&K HC Belated Claims Cannot Be Entertained: Kerala High Court Overturns CAT Decision on Date of Birth Correction DNA Tests Cannot Supersede Established Legal Presumptions: Himachal Pradesh HC Section 26E of SARFAESI Act Overrides VAT Act: Secured Creditor's Charge Has Priority Over State's Tax Dues: Gujrat High Court High Court of Delhi Clarifies Jurisdiction in Commercial Dispute: 'Procedural Efficiency Must Be Upheld Power Under Section 319 CrPC Cannot Be Exercised Without Prima Facie Case Beyond Contradictions: Supreme Court Motive Alone Insufficient for Conviction Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Supreme Court Ensures Equal Financial Benefits for All High Court Judges: Discrimination Based on Recruitment Source Struck Down Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Four Accused: Cites Contradictory Dying Declarations and Lack of Independent Evidence in Murder Case Evidence Corroborates Violent Robbery and Recovery of Stolen Articles: Calcutta High Court Upholds Conviction in Burrabazar Dacoity Case Failure to Implead Contesting Candidates is Fatal; Fundamental Defect Cannot Be Cured: Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Magistrate Not Functus Officio Post-Final Order in Maintenance Cases: Allahabad High Court Substantial Questions of Law a Must in Second Appeals, Reiterates Andhra Pradesh High Court Inconsistencies and Procedural Lapses: Allahabad High Court Acquits Four in Neeta Singh Murder Case

Accused Raised Anti-Nation Slogans in Temple – Allahabad High Court Denies Quashing of Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteworthy judgment on 15th March 2024, the Allahabad High Court, led by Hon'ble Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, refused to quash criminal proceedings against Faizan Ahmad and others. This decision was made in light of charges that involved raising anti-nation slogans in a temple, a serious allegation under Sections 153 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Legal Point of the Judgment: The pivotal legal question concerned the use of Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) for quashing criminal proceedings. The key issue was whether the facts presented formed a sufficient basis to dismiss the charges at this preliminary stage.

Facts and Issues: The origin of the case lay in an FIR filed at Police Station Hasanganj, Lucknow. It was alleged that the applicants disrupted a religious assembly in a temple by chanting slogans against their own nation and in favor of a foreign entity, besides threatening those present. This incident led to their immediate arrest, and the allegations were supported by eyewitness accounts.

Scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C.: The Court emphasized its limited function under Section 482 Cr.P.C., highlighting its inability to conduct a thorough evaluation of evidence at this juncture. The determination required was whether there exists a prima facie case justifying a trial.

Evaluation of Allegations and Investigation: The Court, after reviewing the FIR and the investigation findings, noted that the allegations, supported by eyewitness testimony, formed a credible basis for a trial.

Judicial Precedents: In its analysis, the Court referenced key Supreme Court rulings, including 'State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal', which establish guidelines for exercising the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., underscoring the need for judicial restraint in such matters.

Decision: Hon'ble Justice Subhash Vidyarthi ruled that the seriousness of the allegations, backed by preliminary evidence, merited a full trial. Consequently, the application to quash the criminal proceedings was dismissed as lacking in merit.

Date of Decision: 15th March 2024

Faizan Ahmad @ Idrisi Faizan Shamshad Ahmad And Others vs. State Of U.P.

Similar News