Prolonged Pre-Trial Detention and Right to Liberty Cannot Be Ignored” - Punjab & Haryana High Court Emphasizes Bail as the Rule Taxation Law | Andhra Pradesh High Court Rules Hotel’s Expenditures on Carpets, Mattresses, and Lampshades are Deductible as Current Expenditures Orissa High Court Upholds Disengagement of Teacher for Unauthorized Absence and Suppression of Facts In Disciplined Forces, Transfers are an Administrative Necessity; Judicial Interference is Limited to Cases of Proven Mala Fide: Patna High Court Act Of Judge, When Free From Oblique Motive, Cannot Be Questioned: Madhya Pradesh High Court Quashes Disciplinary Proceedings Against Additional Collector Registration Act | False Statements in Conveyance Documents Qualify for Prosecution Under Registration Act: Kerala High Court When Junior is Promoted, Senior’s Case Cannot be Deferred Unjustly: Karnataka High Court in Sealed Cover Promotion Dispute Medical Training Standards Cannot Be Lowered, Even for Disability’ in MBBS Admission Case: Delhi HC Suspicion, However Strong It May Be, Cannot Take Place Of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds Acquittal No Detention Order Can Rely on Grounds Already Quashed: High Court Sets Precedent on Preventive Detention Limits Tenant's Claims of Hardship and Landlord's Alternate Accommodations Insufficient to Prevent Eviction: Allahabad HC Further Custodial Detention May Not Be Necessary: Calcutta High Court Grants Bail in Murder Case Citing Lack of Specific Evidence High Court, As A Constitutional Court Of Record, Possesses The Inherent Power To Correct Its Own Record: Bombay High Court A Fresh Section 11 Arbitration Petition Without Liberty Granted at the Time of Withdrawal is Not Maintainable: Supreme Court; Principles of Order 23 CPC Applied Adult Sexual Predators Ought Not To Be Dealt With Leniency Or Extended Misplaced Sympathy: Sikkim High Court Retired Employee Entitled to Interest on Delayed Leave Encashment Despite Absence of Statutory Provision: Delhi HC Punjab and Haryana High Court Grants Full Disability Pension and Service Element for Life to Army Veteran Taxation Law | Director Must Be Given Notice to Prove Lack of Negligence: Telangana High Court Quashes Order Against Director in Tax Recovery Case High Court of Uttarakhand Acquits Defendants in High-Profile Murder Case, Cites Lack of Evidence In Cases of Financial Distress, Imposing A Mandatory Deposit Under Negotiable Instruments Act May Jeopardize Appellant’s Right To Appeal: Rajasthan High Court

Accused Raised Anti-Nation Slogans in Temple – Allahabad High Court Denies Quashing of Proceedings

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a noteworthy judgment on 15th March 2024, the Allahabad High Court, led by Hon'ble Justice Subhash Vidyarthi, refused to quash criminal proceedings against Faizan Ahmad and others. This decision was made in light of charges that involved raising anti-nation slogans in a temple, a serious allegation under Sections 153 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Legal Point of the Judgment: The pivotal legal question concerned the use of Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.) for quashing criminal proceedings. The key issue was whether the facts presented formed a sufficient basis to dismiss the charges at this preliminary stage.

Facts and Issues: The origin of the case lay in an FIR filed at Police Station Hasanganj, Lucknow. It was alleged that the applicants disrupted a religious assembly in a temple by chanting slogans against their own nation and in favor of a foreign entity, besides threatening those present. This incident led to their immediate arrest, and the allegations were supported by eyewitness accounts.

Scope of Section 482 Cr.P.C.: The Court emphasized its limited function under Section 482 Cr.P.C., highlighting its inability to conduct a thorough evaluation of evidence at this juncture. The determination required was whether there exists a prima facie case justifying a trial.

Evaluation of Allegations and Investigation: The Court, after reviewing the FIR and the investigation findings, noted that the allegations, supported by eyewitness testimony, formed a credible basis for a trial.

Judicial Precedents: In its analysis, the Court referenced key Supreme Court rulings, including 'State of Haryana vs. Bhajan Lal', which establish guidelines for exercising the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., underscoring the need for judicial restraint in such matters.

Decision: Hon'ble Justice Subhash Vidyarthi ruled that the seriousness of the allegations, backed by preliminary evidence, merited a full trial. Consequently, the application to quash the criminal proceedings was dismissed as lacking in merit.

Date of Decision: 15th March 2024

Faizan Ahmad @ Idrisi Faizan Shamshad Ahmad And Others vs. State Of U.P.

Similar News