Mother Cannot Mask Paternity to Satisfy Ego: Bombay High Court Rejects Petition to List Woman as ‘Single Parent’ in Child’s Birth Certificate Transferee Pendente Lite Is Bound by the Decree—Cannot Obstruct Execution Proceedings: Allahabad High Court Pulls Up Revisional Court for Overreach Higher Placement in Seniority List Cannot Be Ignored: Supreme Court Upholds Direction to Consider Contractual Worker for Appointment on Par with Others Regularised CBI Investigation is Not to Be Ordered Routinely on Vague Allegations: Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Order Directing CBI Probe in Extortion Case When Aggressors Trespass Armed into a Dwelling and Cause Fatal Injuries, Exception to Murder Does Not Arise: Supreme Court Affirms Conviction under Section 302 IPC Delayed Payment for 50 Years Warrants Reasonable Interest, But Excessive Rates Cannot Be Granted": Supreme Court Total Non-Compliance of Section 42 and 50 is Impermissible: Himachal Pradesh High Court Affirms Acquittal in 100 Grams Charas Case Can't Rule Out ASI's Role In False Rape Case Conspiracy: Punjab & Haryana High Court Refuses To Expunge Remarks Wikipedia Can't Claim Neutrality While Hosting Defamatory Edits: Delhi High Court Orders Takedown in ANI's Defamation Suit No Evidence of Termination—Industrial Tribunal’s Award Granting Full Back Wages Without Trial Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Delay of 1132 Days Can't Be Excused by Casual Excuses: Bombay High Court Dismisses Builder’s Plea, Upholds NCDRC Order in Consumer Dispute

Accused Failed to Rebut Presumption Under Sections 118 and 139 of N.I. Act: Karnataka High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Modifies Sentence

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The High Court of Karnataka has delivered a pivotal judgment concerning the interpretation and enforcement of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (N.I. Act). This section addresses the dishonor of cheques and has significant implications for financial transactions and legal liabilities.

The petitioner, V. Srinivas, was accused of failing to honor repayment commitments by issuing three dishonored cheques totaling Rs. 8,00,000/- to the respondent, V. Krishnamurthy. The cheques were presented and returned due to insufficient funds. Following the lower courts’ conviction and the affirmation by the appellate court, the petitioner sought revision under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging both the conviction and the severity of the sentence.

The court observed that the complainant convincingly proved the transaction’s legitimacy and the issuance of cheques. The petitioner’s defense, suggesting the loss of cheques and alleged misuse by the complainant, was deemed inconsistent and unconvincing.

The court highlighted that the accused did not successfully counter the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the N.I. Act regarding the holder’s entitlement and the absence of debt or liability. The judgment notes, “Accused failed to rebut the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of N.I. Act.”

The petitioner’s attempt to introduce new defenses, such as alleged violations of the Income Tax Act by the complainant, was rejected. The court emphasized that such claims were not grounds for acquittal under the N.I. Act.

The court dismissed the applicability of cited precedents favoring the accused, reinforcing that the complainant’s testimony and documentary evidence substantiated the claims against the petitioner.

Decision: The revision petition was partly allowed. The court upheld the conviction for the offence under Section 138 of the N.I. Act but modified the sentence. The imprisonment was set aside, opting instead for a fine of Rs. 16,00,000/-. The accused was given forty-five days to pay the fine or face a default sentence of six months.

Date of Decision: 8th April 2024.

Srinivas vs. V. Krishnamurthy

 

Similar News