Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Collector’s Appointment of Ex-Serviceman as Lambardar: Preference for Service to the State Valid Tax to Be Computed at 100% Under DTVSV Act, Rejects Inclusion of Belated Grounds in Disputed Tax: Bombay High Court Petitioner’s Father Did Not Fall Within Definition of Enemy – Kerala High Court Quashes Land Classification Under Enemy Property Act Calcutta High Court Upholds Cancellation of LPG Distributor LOI for Violating Guidelines Recording 'Reasons to Believe' is a Mandatory Safeguard, Not a Mere Formality Under PMLA: P&H High Court Illegality Is Incurable, Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Regularized: Bombay High Court Kerala High Court Quashes Tribunal’s Order Granting Retrospective UGC Benefits to Librarians Without Required Qualifications Order XLI Rule 27 CPC | No Evidence Can Be Admitted Beyond Pleadings, And Additional Evidence Cannot Be Allowed Merely To Fill Lacunae: Jharkhand High Court Quashing | Mere Heated Exchanges Over Loan Repayment Do Not Constitute Abetment of Suicide: Supreme Court Prisoner Transfers Must Prioritize Security and Prevent Gang Violence: Supreme Court Restores Intra-State Transfer Order Jurisdiction Under Section 100 CPC Is Conditional Upon Framing Substantial Questions of Law: Supreme Court Panchayat Election | Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds Bar on Judicial Review During Election Process Encroachment Allegation Requires Concrete Evidence, Not Mere Surmises: Bombay High Court Dismisses Plea for Disqualification of Sarpanch Order Denying Permission for Peaceful Protest Rally Set Aside: Calcutta High Court Prolonged Custody Alone Cannot Justify Bail In Cases Involving Heinous Crimes: Delhi High Court Body Shaming and Sexually Colored Remarks Are Unacceptable In A Civilized Society: Kerala High Court No Mandatory Injunction Where Failure to Prove Ownership and Possession: Punjab and Haryana High Court Supreme Court Dismisses Article 32 Petition Seeking Declaration of Bombay High Court Judgment as Illegal Specific Relief Act | Power to Extend Time Under Section 28 Is Discretionary and Must Be Exercised Prudently: Supreme Court

Absence Of a Healthy Sexual Relationship Is Considered Detrimental To The Marriage – Divorce Granted – Del. HC

06 September 2024 5:35 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the High Court of Delhi upheld a lower court's decision granting divorce to a husband on the grounds of "cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage."

The Bench, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, stated that the "absence of a healthy sexual relationship is considered detrimental to the marriage." The court further observed that the wife's reluctance to have sexual relations with her husband amounted to an act of cruelty.

The case also involved allegations of false accusations. The wife had previously filed a rape case against the husband, leading to his acquittal. The court noted that such false complaints "constitute mental cruelty" and were an act of "extreme cruelty" against the husband.

The court also took into account the "irretrievable breakdown" of the marriage, observing that the couple had been separated since February 2014. The judgment stated, "For a couple to be deprived of each other’s company, proves that the marriage cannot survive, and such deprivation of conjugal relationship is an act of extreme cruelty."

The wife had made counter-allegations of cruelty, claiming harassment for dowry and physical abuse. However, the court found these allegations to be unsupported by sufficient evidence.

The judgment cited several previous cases, including Mrs. Rita Nijhawan vs. Mr. Bal Kishan Nijhawan, AIR 1973 Del 200, and Vinita Saxena vs Pankaj Pandit (2006) 3 SCC 778, among others, to substantiate its decision.

Date of Decision:22nd August, 2023

xxxx vs xxxx

Similar News