MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Absence Of a Healthy Sexual Relationship Is Considered Detrimental To The Marriage – Divorce Granted – Del. HC

06 September 2024 5:35 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement , the High Court of Delhi upheld a lower court's decision granting divorce to a husband on the grounds of "cruelty and irretrievable breakdown of marriage."

The Bench, comprising Hon'ble Mr. Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Hon'ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, stated that the "absence of a healthy sexual relationship is considered detrimental to the marriage." The court further observed that the wife's reluctance to have sexual relations with her husband amounted to an act of cruelty.

The case also involved allegations of false accusations. The wife had previously filed a rape case against the husband, leading to his acquittal. The court noted that such false complaints "constitute mental cruelty" and were an act of "extreme cruelty" against the husband.

The court also took into account the "irretrievable breakdown" of the marriage, observing that the couple had been separated since February 2014. The judgment stated, "For a couple to be deprived of each other’s company, proves that the marriage cannot survive, and such deprivation of conjugal relationship is an act of extreme cruelty."

The wife had made counter-allegations of cruelty, claiming harassment for dowry and physical abuse. However, the court found these allegations to be unsupported by sufficient evidence.

The judgment cited several previous cases, including Mrs. Rita Nijhawan vs. Mr. Bal Kishan Nijhawan, AIR 1973 Del 200, and Vinita Saxena vs Pankaj Pandit (2006) 3 SCC 778, among others, to substantiate its decision.

Date of Decision:22nd August, 2023

xxxx vs xxxx

Latest Legal News