Promotees Allowed to Challenge Provisional Seniority List in Dispute Between Direct Recruitment and Promotion: Kerala High Court Frivolous Defenses Cannot Justify Leave to Defend Under Order XXXVII CPC Delhi High Court Candidates Merely Enrolled in Final Year B.V.Sc. Program Ineligible for Veterinary Officer Recruitment: Rajasthan High Court Manufacturing or Sale of Garments Does Not Attract Copyright Protection; Procedural Violations Under Trade Marks Act Renders Prosecution Unsustainable: P&H High Court Ownership Alone Is Not Sufficient to Maintain Eviction Suit; Plaintiff Must Qualify as a Lessor Under Lease Agreement: Calcutta High Court Findings Based on Evidence Cannot Be Interfered With in a Second Appeal Without Substantial Question of Law: AP High Court Chain of Circumstances Broken: Inferences Cannot Replace Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt: Kerala High Court Bail | Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Violates Article 21 of the Constitution: Bombay High Court Encroachment on a Common Lane Gives Rise to Recurring Cause of Action: Madras High Court Holds Limitation Act Inapplicable to Pathway Disputes Reproductive Autonomy Includes the Right to Abort Without Spousal Consent: P&H High Court Access to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 is Not an Absolute Bar Against MSEFC Awards: Supreme Court Refers Key Questions on Writ Jurisdiction to Larger Bench Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Ousted for Title and Mortgage Disputes Under SARFAESI Act: Supreme Court Principle of Bail is the Rule, Jail is the Exception: Supreme Court Panchayat Law | Mandatory Compliance With Section 34 And Rule 3 Is Non-Negotiable In Resignation Cases: Bombay High Court Quashes Resignation Of Upa-Sarpanch Recovery of Bullet Fired from Accused’s Weapon Crucial: PH High Court Reaffirms Conviction in Murder Case Injured Witness Evidence Carries Built-in Reliability Unless Contradicted Significantly: Kerala High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Murder Case Civil Dispute with Criminal Elements Cannot Be Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.: Karnataka High Court Issuance of Summons Under Section 91 CrPC During Preliminary Verification is Without Jurisdiction: High Court of J&K and Ladakh Article 21 Prevails Over NDPS Act’s Section 37 Restrictions in Cases of Prolonged Incarceration: Delhi High Court Once a Property is Waqf, It Remains Waqf Perpetually: Calcutta High Court Affirms No Secular Ownership Can Derive from Waqf Properties Surveillance Without Opportunity to Object Violates Articles 14, 19, and 21: Allahabad High Court Quashes Class-B History Sheets Mandatory Provisions of Order XXI CPC Were Violated, Rendering the Auction Sale Illegal: Punjab and Haryana High Court

“Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Attempt to Murder Case: ‘What is Important is an Intention Coupled with the Overt Act’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed the appeal of S K Khaja, who was convicted under Sections 307 and 332 of the IPC. The apex court emphasized, “What is important is an intention coupled with the overt act committed by the appellant/accused.”

The appellant, S K Khaja, had challenged the High Court’s decision that confirmed his conviction and sentencing to rigorous imprisonment for five years and two years for the respective offenses. The case revolved around the appellant’s alleged acts of demanding ransom and threatening the public, leading to an altercation with police during his arrest.

The appellant’s counsel argued that the injuries inflicted on the police officer were not severe enough to warrant a conviction under Section 307 of the IPC. However, the State countered by pointing out that the appellant had misused his liberty and was involved in four other cases during the appeal.

In its observation, the Court noted, “The trial court, as well as, the High Court have rightly appreciated the evidence and convicted the appellant/accused – S K Khaja for the offense punishable under Sections 307 and 332 of the IPC.”

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, thereby upholding the conviction and sentences imposed by the lower courts. The appellant has been directed to surrender before the trial Court within a period of four weeks.

This landmark judgment serves as a reminder that the severity of the injury is not the sole criterion for conviction; the intention and the overt act are equally significant.

DATE OF DECISION: AUGUST 23, 2023

S K KHAJA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/23-Aug-2023_SK_Khaja_Vs_State.pdf"]

Similar News