Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court’s Decision, Restores Commissioner’s Order in Workmen Compensation Case: ‘A Possible View’”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


On September 4, 2023 — In a landmark judgement, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the Gujarat High Court’s decision that had nullified the Commissioner’s award of compensation to the legal representatives of a deceased employee. The apex court termed the Commissioner’s conclusions as “a possible view,” thereby negating any perversity in the findings.

The bench, comprising Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Sanjay Karol, delivered the verdict on September 4, 2023. The case revolved around the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923, and the appeal was filed by the mother and wife of the deceased employee, Ramakant Yadav.

The Supreme Court observed that the High Court failed to frame any “substantial question of law,” as required by Section 30 of the Workmen Compensation Act, 1923. “The act governing the present dispute has been amended, by which the word ‘workmen’ has been substituted by ‘employees’,” the bench noted.

The Court also emphasized that the Workmen Compensation Act is a social welfare legislation and should be given a beneficial construction. “It is well-established that the Act is a social welfare legislation and, therefore, it must be given a beneficial construction,” the judgement read.

The Commissioner had originally awarded ₹3,94,120 as compensation, 9% interest, and a 50% penalty amounting to ₹1,97,060 against the employer. The High Court had set aside this order, leading to the appeal in the Supreme Court.

As a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, the Commissioner’s order has been restored, and the amount will become payable to the claimants forthwith. Both parties were directed to bear their own costs.

 Date of Decision:  04 September 2023

FULMATI DHRAMDEV YADAV & ANR. vs NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR.          

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/04-Sep-2023_Fullmati_Vs_New_India_Assurance.pdf"]

Latest Legal News