'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

“Rank Illegality”: Madras High Court Upholds Artisan’s Right to Sell Eco-Friendly Vinayaka Idols

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court today asserted that preventing the sale of eco-friendly Vinayaka idols would amount to “rank illegality.” The court has directed the authorities not to interfere with an artisan’s fundamental right to sell these idols, calling it a guaranteed right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

Justice G.R. Swaminathan, presiding over the case, strongly criticized the actions of the local authorities in Tirunelveli City who had restricted the petitioner, a Rajasthani artisan named Prakash, from selling Vinayaka idols. The artisan had contended that he was facing financial ruin due to the intervention of the authorities.

The judge remarked that, “If the idols are eco-friendly, they can be manufactured and sold and such activities cannot be stopped for any reason.” He went on to state that any act of prevention from the police or the authorities would be “rank illegality.”

The judgment was based on the artisan’s writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus to safeguard his right to profession and business. Justice Swaminathan clarified that while environmental guidelines must be observed, particularly in the case of idol immersion, these guidelines should not come in the way of the artisan’s right to sell the idols.

The court also provided checks to ensure environmental compliance, directing the petitioner to maintain a register of purchasers to ensure that the idols are immersed in accordance with eco-friendly norms.

The decision has been hailed as a significant precedent, upholding the rights of artisans while also emphasizing the importance of environmental guidelines.

Date of Decision: 16.09.2023

Prakas vs The District Collector,

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/prakash-v-district-collector-16Sep23-MadHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News