Section 9 A&C Act Relief Available Until Award Is Actually Enforced, Even After It Becomes Enforceable: Telangana High Court Matrimonial Litigations Must Not Degenerate Into Contests Of Mutual Humiliation By Weaponising Private Images: Delhi High Court Unarmed Witnesses’ Inaction Against Armed Assailants Justified By Instinct Of Self-Preservation; Testimony Cannot Be Discarded: Allahabad High Court Ocular Evidence Outweighs Motive: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Based On Reliable Eyewitness Testimony Arrest Illegal If Written 'Grounds Of Arrest' Not Furnished To Accused; Communication Of Mere 'Reasons' Insufficient: Bombay High Court Absence Of Territorial Jurisdiction No Ground To Quash FIR At Threshold If Allegations Disclose Cognizable Offence: Calcutta High Court Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua Non For PC Act Conviction; Voice Recordings Inadmissible Without Sec 65-B Certificate: Chhattisgarh HC Section 91 IEA | Disposition Of Immovable Property Cannot Be Proved By Oral Evidence If Written Document Not Produced: Delhi High Court NRC Legacy Data Extracts Inadmissible Without Section 65B Certificate; PAN Card & EPIC Not Proof Of Citizenship: Gauhati High Court Testimony Of Injured Witness Entitled To Great Weight; Minor Contradictions Due To Lapse Of Memory Cannot Discard Prosecution Case: Himachal Pradesh High Court Section 164 CrPC Statement Recorded Without Procedural Safeguards Or 'Cooling-Off' Period Not A Valid Confession: Jharkhand High Court Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Investigation Is At A Nascent Stage If Custodial Interrogation Is Not Indispensable: Telangana High Court Actual Pay Drawn During Last 10 Months Must Be Basis For Pension Calculation, Regardless Of Notional Pay In Parent Bank: Punjab & Haryana High Court Kerala High Court Remands Teacher Seniority Dispute For Fresh Consideration To Verify If Senior Teacher Relinquished Promotion Claim Receipt Of DNA Report After Testimony Doesn't Automatically Confer Right To Recall Witness For Further Cross-Examination: Madhya Pradesh High Court Possession Of 'Bhang' Not An Offence Under NDPS Act, Specific Definition Excludes It: Jharkhand High Court Acquits Man Trial Court Cannot Reject Request For Handwriting Expert Merely Because Signatures Are On Photocopies: Punjab & Haryana High Court

“Rank Illegality”: Madras High Court Upholds Artisan’s Right to Sell Eco-Friendly Vinayaka Idols

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a landmark ruling, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court today asserted that preventing the sale of eco-friendly Vinayaka idols would amount to “rank illegality.” The court has directed the authorities not to interfere with an artisan’s fundamental right to sell these idols, calling it a guaranteed right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India.

Justice G.R. Swaminathan, presiding over the case, strongly criticized the actions of the local authorities in Tirunelveli City who had restricted the petitioner, a Rajasthani artisan named Prakash, from selling Vinayaka idols. The artisan had contended that he was facing financial ruin due to the intervention of the authorities.

The judge remarked that, “If the idols are eco-friendly, they can be manufactured and sold and such activities cannot be stopped for any reason.” He went on to state that any act of prevention from the police or the authorities would be “rank illegality.”

The judgment was based on the artisan’s writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus to safeguard his right to profession and business. Justice Swaminathan clarified that while environmental guidelines must be observed, particularly in the case of idol immersion, these guidelines should not come in the way of the artisan’s right to sell the idols.

The court also provided checks to ensure environmental compliance, directing the petitioner to maintain a register of purchasers to ensure that the idols are immersed in accordance with eco-friendly norms.

The decision has been hailed as a significant precedent, upholding the rights of artisans while also emphasizing the importance of environmental guidelines.

Date of Decision: 16.09.2023

Prakas vs The District Collector,

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/prakash-v-district-collector-16Sep23-MadHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News