-
by sayum
14 February 2026 2:22 PM
New Delhi, August 22, 2023 – In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the judgments and orders passed by the High Court in First Appeal Nos. 1447 of 2006 and 1490 of 2006 related to land acquisition proceedings.
The bench comprising J. BELA M. TRIVEDI and J. DIPANKAR DATTA observed that the "issue of limitation raised by respondent- Committee before the Reference Court and before the High Court was not only not tenable but was highly unreasonable and improper." [Para 6]
The case revolved around the lands belonging to the appellant-trust that were sought to be acquired by the respondent for Agricultural Produce Market Committee. The parties had arrived at consent terms to determine the market value of the lands, and the High Court had disposed of the Writ Petition accordingly. However, the respondent-Committee raised the issue of limitation before the Reference Court, taking undue advantage of ambiguity in the consent terms.
The Supreme Court applied the doctrine of harmonious construction to interpret the document as a whole and found that the High Court's interference with the well-reasoned findings of the Reference Court was erroneous. "Such a plea raised after taking over the possession of lands in question from the appellant was not only not in consonance with the tenor of the consent terms but it smacked of ulterior motive on the part of the respondent," the bench noted. [Para 11]
The apex court held that the impugned judgments and orders passed by the High Court were ex facie erroneous and set them aside, allowing both the appeals.
Date of Decision: August 22nd, 2023
SHRI NASHIK PANCHAVATI PANJARPOL TRUST & ORS. vs THE CHAIRMAN & ANR.
[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/22-Aug-2023_NASHIK_PANCHAVATI_PANJARPOL_Vs_Chairman.pdf"]
