Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

“Court Finds ‘Presumptive Grounds’ Insufficient for Denying ‘No Objection Certificate’ for Meat Shop”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Lucknow, 29th August 2023 – In a landmark decision, the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, comprising Hon’ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. And Hon’ble Manish Kumar, J., ruled in favor of Mohd. Shakeel, who had petitioned against the rejection of his application for a ‘No Objection Certificate’ to open a retail meat shop.

The court observed that the “ground of unauthorized meat sales is presumptive and not a valid reason for refusing the ‘no objection certificate.’” [Para 4]

The petitioner had approached the court after his application was rejected based on an unfavorable police report. The report cited the shop’s proximity to religious places and the likelihood of unauthorized meat sales as reasons for the rejection. [Para 1-3]

Highlighting an inconsistency in the application of rules, the court noted that “other meat shops in the same area have received ‘no objection certificates.’” The court further stated that “no religious places are within a 50-meter radius of these shops,” thereby questioning the validity of the police report. [Para 5-6]

In light of these observations, the court directed the Superintendent of Police to “reconsider the matter and pass a fresh order within four weeks.” [Para 7] The licencing authority was also instructed to consider the matter in accordance with the law.

The writ petition stands allowed, and the matter is to be reconsidered, marking a significant step towards ensuring fair and consistent application of rules and regulations.

Date of Decision: 29.8.2023

Mohd. Shakeel vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Supply

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Allh.HC_.pdf"]

Latest Legal News