Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

“Court Finds ‘Presumptive Grounds’ Insufficient for Denying ‘No Objection Certificate’ for Meat Shop”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


Lucknow, 29th August 2023 – In a landmark decision, the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, comprising Hon’ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. And Hon’ble Manish Kumar, J., ruled in favor of Mohd. Shakeel, who had petitioned against the rejection of his application for a ‘No Objection Certificate’ to open a retail meat shop.

The court observed that the “ground of unauthorized meat sales is presumptive and not a valid reason for refusing the ‘no objection certificate.’” [Para 4]

The petitioner had approached the court after his application was rejected based on an unfavorable police report. The report cited the shop’s proximity to religious places and the likelihood of unauthorized meat sales as reasons for the rejection. [Para 1-3]

Highlighting an inconsistency in the application of rules, the court noted that “other meat shops in the same area have received ‘no objection certificates.’” The court further stated that “no religious places are within a 50-meter radius of these shops,” thereby questioning the validity of the police report. [Para 5-6]

In light of these observations, the court directed the Superintendent of Police to “reconsider the matter and pass a fresh order within four weeks.” [Para 7] The licencing authority was also instructed to consider the matter in accordance with the law.

The writ petition stands allowed, and the matter is to be reconsidered, marking a significant step towards ensuring fair and consistent application of rules and regulations.

Date of Decision: 29.8.2023

Mohd. Shakeel vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Food And Supply

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Allh.HC_.pdf"]

Latest Legal News