Overloading Isn't Negligence: Andhra Pradesh High Court Slaps Full Liability On Insurer, Enhances Compensation In Motor Accident Case Coparcener Can Orally Relinquish Share In Ancestral Property Without Registered Deed, But Mere Name Deletion From Revenue Records Not Relinquishment: Bombay High Court 'Cannot Insist On Threshold Adjudication Of Res Judicata In Small Causes Court': Allahabad HC Upholds Summary Procedure, Dismisses Petition Cannot Convert Specific Performance Suit Into Title Dispute: Calcutta High Court Refuses To Implead Third-Party Claimant Section 139 NI Act Presumption Triggered For Post-Dated Cheques Issued Under Settlement Agreements, Cannot Quash Summons Claiming 'No Existing Debt': Delhi High Court Motive Loses Significance Where Direct Ocular Evidence Is Reliable: Gauhati High Court Upholds Murder Conviction Jharkhand High Court Quashes Reinstatement Award For Workman Accused Of Threatening Senior With Revolver Absolute Non-Application Of Mind: Kerala High Court Quashes KAAPA Detention Order Passed In Ignorance Of Prior Judicial Quashing Ruling Payment Under Protest Is Not A Concluded Settlement: Madras High Court Upholds ₹3.25 Cr Arbitral Award Against Madras Fertilizers Benami Plea Cannot Kill A Suit At The Threshold: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Suit For Partition Of 'Family Property' Presumption Of Innocence Gets Concretized: Orissa High Court Refuses To Reverse 30-Year-Old Acquittal Cannot Keep Accused In Jail For Inordinate Period By Taking Refuge In Section 37 NDPS: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail In Commercial Quantity Heroin Case No Coparcenary Right By Birth In Ancestral Property Devolving Under Section 8': Rajasthan High Court Dismisses Plea Article 21 Violated: Madras High Court Says Constitutional Courts Must Undo Wrongful Life Imprisonment Of Juveniles, Frees Man Jailed For 25 Years Expert In Medical Negligence Cases Must Be Qualified In Relevant Speciality: Telangana High Court Quashes Consumer Forum Orders Denying Independent Neurosurgical Opinion Supreme Court Issues Sweeping Guidelines to Combat Systemic Delays in Dowry Death Trials Resisting Medical Exam Is Not A Crime: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against Forest Department Official Victim Has Unbridled Right To Participate: Calcutta High Court Directs Supply Of Case Documents Under BNSS

“Central Information Commission Upholds SBI’s Denial to Disclose Details of Due Diligence in Loan Sanctioning, Cites Fiduciary Relationship”

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


The Central Information Commission (CIC) today upheld the decision of the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) of the State Bank of India, refusing to disclose details regarding who carried out due diligence in sanctioning a loan to M/s Priyadarshi Motors Pvt Ltd. The CIC, presided over by Information Commissioner Saroj Punhani, cited the fiduciary relationship as the primary ground for denying access to the said information.

In the landmark decision, the Commission observed, “The CPIO has appropriately denied the personal details who carried out due diligence of the above-said property for sanctioning of loan to M/s Priyadarshi Motors Pvt Ltd, which not only contains the elements of personal information of third party which stands exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of RTI Act but also held/available in the bank under fiduciary capacity and thus, attracted exemption clause of Section 8(1)(e) of RTI Act.”

The Appellant, Rahul Kumar Singh, had approached the CIC after being dissatisfied with the responses of the CPIO and the First Appellate Authority (FAA). He argued that the denial of information led him to suffer financial losses as the property in question was leased by him to the firm M/s Priyadarshi Motors Pvt Ltd.

The Commission’s decision also referenced previous judgments of the Supreme Court, underlining the fiduciary relationship between the bank and its client. It drew attention to the clause of Section 8(1)(g) of the RTI Act which states that disclosing information could “endanger the life or physical safety of any person.”

Today’s ruling sets a precedent in matters of disclosing sensitive financial and personal information under the RTI Act and reiterates the protective boundaries laid down by law.

Date of Decision: 31/08/2023

RAHUL KUMAR SINGH vs State Bank Of India

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Rahul_Kumar_Vs_SBI_31_AUG_2023_CIC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News