Registrar Has No Power To Cancel Registered Sale Deeds: Madras High Court Reaffirms Civil Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction MP High Court Refuses to Quash FIR Against Principal of Sacred Heart Convent High School in Forced Conversion Case Employees Of Registered Societies Cannot Claim Article 311 Protection: Delhi High Court Clarifies Limits Of Constitutional Safeguards In Private Employment Maintenance Cannot Be Doubled Without Cogent Reasons, Wife's Education And Earning Capacity Relevant Factors: Gujarat High Court A Foreign Award Must First Be "Recognised" Before It Becomes A Decree: Bombay High Court A Registered Will Does Not Become Genuine Merely Because It Is Registered: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejects Suspicious Testament Compensation Under Railways Act Requires Proof of Bona Fide Passenger – Mere GRP Entry and Medical Records Cannot Establish ‘Untoward Incident’: Delhi High Court Tenancy Rights Cannot Be Bequeathed By Will: Himachal Pradesh High Court Declares Mutation Based On Tenant’s Will Void Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based On Mere Apprehension of Bail: Delhi High Court Quashes PITNDPS Detention Order Probate Court Alone Has Exclusive Jurisdiction To Decide Validity Of Will – Probate Petition Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because A Civil Suit Is Pending: Allahabad High Court PwD Candidates Cannot Be Denied Appointment After Selection; Authorities Must Accommodate Them In Suitable Posts: Supreme Court Directs SSC And CAG To Appoint Candidates With Disabilities When Registered Partition Deed Exists, Plea Of Prior Oral Partition Cannot Override It:  Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal Municipal Bodies Cannot Demand Character Verification Of Residents: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Surveillance Condition In Building Sanction State Cannot Exploit Contractual Workers For Perennial Work: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Pay Parity To PUNBUS Drivers And Conductors Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna 'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court High Courts Should Not Interfere In Academic Integrity Proceedings At Preliminary Stage: Kerala High Court Power Of Attorney Holder With Personal Knowledge Can Depose In Cheque Bounce Cases: Kerala High Court Sets Aside Acquittal Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance

"Punjab-Haryana High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Bounce Case, Citing 'Abuse of Process of Law'"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin

In a significant legal development, the Punjab-Haryana High Court has quashed an FIR in a cheque bounce case, emphasizing that continuing proceedings after the withdrawal of the main complaint amounts to an "abuse of the process of law."

The case, titled "Parvez Akhtar vs. State of Punjab & Anr.," involved a cheque for Rs. 18,000 issued by the petitioner, Mr. Parvez Akhtar, which was subsequently dishonored. This led to the initiation of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

However, the petitioner was declared a proclaimed person during the legal proceedings. Following this, a compromise was reached between the parties involved, resulting in the withdrawal of the complaint. The complainant expressed the desire to discontinue the case.

In his verdict, Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi referred to precedent cases and observed that once the main petition under Section 138 of the Act is withdrawn due to an amicable settlement, the continuation of proceedings under Section 174-A IPC is tantamount to an "abuse of the process of law." This legal principle was upheld by the court.

The judgment, which is in line with earlier decisions, underlines the importance of ensuring that legal proceedings are not prolonged unnecessarily, especially when the main complaint has been withdrawn due to a settlement between the parties.

This ruling reaffirms the principle that legal processes should serve the interests of justice and not be used to harass or burden individuals once a resolution has been reached through compromise.

The decision, dated October 11, 2023, sets a precedent for cases involving similar circumstances in the Punjab-Haryana region, where the continuation of proceedings after the withdrawal of the main complaint will be carefully scrutinized to prevent any perceived abuse of the legal system.

Date of Decision: October 11, 2023

 Parvez Akhtar Vs State of Punjab & Anr.    

[gview file="https://lawyerenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Parvez_Akhtar_vs_State_Of_Punjab_And_Another_on_11_Ocr_2023.pdf"]

Latest Legal News

  • by sayum
    13 March 2026 2:33 PM
Agreement Cannot Dissolve Hindu Marriage, But Can Prove Mutual Separation”: J&K & Ladakh High Court Denies Maintenance
  • by sayum
    13 March 2026 2:33 PM
ED Officers Accused Of Assault By ₹23-Crore Scam Accused – FIR Survives But Probe Shifted To CBI: Jharkhand High Court
  • by sayum
    13 March 2026 2:33 PM
State Cannot Use Article 226 To Evade Compliance With Court Orders: Gauhati High Court Dismisses Union’s Petition With Costs
  • by sayum
    13 March 2026 2:33 PM
Once Leave Under Section 80(2) CPC Is Granted, Prior Notice to Government Is Not Mandatory: Orissa High Court Restores Trial Court Decree
  • by sayum
    13 March 2026 2:33 PM
'Raising A Child As Daughter Does Not Make Her An Adopted Child': Punjab & Haryana High Court
  • by sayum
    13 March 2026 2:33 PM
Police Inputs Cannot Create New Building Laws: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Security-Based Conditions Near Nabanna