'Promotion Effected Long Ago Not To Be Disturbed': Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Quashing 13-Year-Old Promotion; Holds 'Laying Rules' Directory Not Mandatory "Mere Oral Assertion Or 'Data Loss' Letter Not Enough To Prove Driving Licence Validity; Owner Has Strict Duty To Ensure Renewal": Supreme Court Reinstates Insurer's Non-Liability, Applies 'Pay & Recover' Principle "Zero Tolerance To Corruption": Supreme Court Reinstates FIRs Against Karnataka Cops, Slams High Court For 'Mini-Trial' & Exceeding S.482 CrPC Powers ‘Ancillary Services Don't Override Carriage’: Supreme Court Upholds 7.5% Presumptive Income For Cruise Operators Under Section 44B IT Act, Rejects Revenue's Higher Tax Claim Division Bench Refuses To Quash FIR, Holds It Cannot Nullify Single Judge's Final Order Directing Registration Of Case: Allahabad High Court High Court Leave Under Clause XII Doesn't Protect Transferred Suits; Section 16 CPC Strictly Applies To City Civil Court In 'Suits For Land': Bombay High Court Joint Account Holder Who Didn't Sign The Dishonoured Cheque Cannot Be Prosecuted Under Section 138 NI Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Suits Cannot Be Consolidated If Parties, Properties, And Causes Of Action Are Different: Telangana High Court P&H High Court Halts All Construction In Mohali's Shivalik Foothills Over Failure To Demarcate 'Forest Land', Bars Land Sale No Embargo On Issuing Single Statutory Notice Under Section 138 NI Act For Multiple Dishonoured Cheques: Orissa High Court District Collector Has No Jurisdiction Under CrPC To Order Reopening Of Investigation Or Recall Of Closure Report: Madhya Pradesh High Court No Exclusive Monopoly Over Geographical Term 'Malabar' In Isolation; Protection Limited To Registered Composite Marks: Kerala High Court Person In 'De Facto' Control Is A Promoter Under Companies Act Even If Designated As Professional Director: Karnataka High Court Supreme Court Urges Mandatory Animal Tagging, Strict Enforcement of Gaushala Laws To Tackle Stray Cattle Crisis; Holds Owners Accountable "Don't Render Victims Remediless": Supreme Court Slams High Court For Dismissing Plea Over Stray Bull Death, Awards ₹15 Lakh Compensation Supreme Court Red-Flags 'Unregulated Shadow Work' of Private Investigators, Calls For Legislative Overhaul on Digital Evidence & Privacy Rights 125 CrPC | Wife 'Not Entitled To Interim Maintenance If Adultery Established Ex Facie': Supreme Court Evidence Against Absconder Invalid Without Prior S.299 CrPC Order: SC Acquits Murder Accused Ad Valorem Court Fee Mandatory For Section 54 Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Awards: Supreme Court

"Failure to Establish Reputation or Goodwill": High Court's Stay Order Upheld in Intellectual Property Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a recent decision, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's stay order in an intellectual property lawsuit involving accusations of passing-off and copyright infringement. The Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the appellant failed to sufficiently "establish its reputation or goodwill in connection with the goods in question."

 Highlights from the Judgement

Justice Abhay S. Oka and Justice Rajesh Bindal emphasized that merely producing sales figures and marketing expenses were not enough to establish goodwill or reputation. According to the judgment, "Prima facie, there is no evidence on this aspect." [Para 13]

 Unsuccessful Passing-Off Action

The High Court’s stay on the decree of the passing-off action was deemed justified, as the appellant failed to prove crucial elements, including the actual sales and expenditures related to advertising and promotion of the product. "Therefore, we find that the High Court was justified in staying that particular part of the decree of the Trial Court," the judgment reads. [Para 14]

 Acquiescence in Copyright Infringement

The Court also touched upon the issue of acquiescence as a valid defense in cases of copyright infringement. The appellant was found to have withdrawn their objections to the use of labels by the respondent without any conditional terms, constituting a "prima facie case of acquiescence." [Para 16]

 Concerns Over Conduct of the Bar

The judgment also highlighted the conduct of lawyers during trial proceedings, stating that if members of the Bar do not cooperate, "it will be very difficult for our Courts to deal with the huge arrears." [Para 19]

 No Future Influence on the Pending Appeal

The Supreme Court clarified that the High Court should not be influenced by the observations made in the present judgment or the impugned judgment when deciding the pending appeal. [Para 20]

This case serves as a vital precedent on how intellectual property claims need to be substantiated with concrete evidence, as well as the implications of the conduct of legal representatives in the courtroom.

Date of Decision: September 14, 2023

Brihan Karan Sugar Syndicate Private Limited  vs Yashwantrao Mohite Krushna Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana           

          

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/14-Sep-2023_BRIHAN_KARAN_SUGAR_Vs_YASHWANTRAO.pdf"]

Latest Legal News