Consensual Relationship That Later Turns Sour Is Not Rape: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Breach of Promise Case Double Presumption of Innocence Applies; No Interference Unless Trial Court Judgment Is Perverse: Allahabad High Court in Murder Appeal Under BNSS A Single Act of Corruption Warrants Dismissal – 32 Years of Service Offers No Immunity: Punjab & Haryana High Court Upholds ASI’s Removal Suit Against Trustee Without Charity Commissioner’s Consent Is Statutorily Barred: Bombay High Court Government Can't Deny Implied Surrender After Refusing to Accept Possession: Madras HC Clarifies Scope of Section 111(f) of TP Act Custodial Interrogation Must Prevail Over Pre-Arrest Comfort in Hate Speech Cases: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail for Provocative Remarks Against Migrants Mutation Order Without Notice Cannot Stand in Law: Orissa High Court Quashes Tahasildar's Rejection for Violating Natural Justice Cruelty Must Be Grave and Proven – Mere Allegations of Disobedience or Demand for Separate Residence Don’t Justify Divorce: Jharkhand High Court Rejects Husband’s Divorce Appeal Retaliatory Prosecution Cannot Override Liberty: Himachal Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in PMLA Case Post CBI Trap of ED Officer Illegal Remand Without Production of Accused Is Not a Technical Lapse, But a Constitutional Breach: Andhra Pradesh High Court Grants Bail in Major NDPS Case Inherent Power Under Section 528 BNSS Not a Substitute for Article 226 When FIR Is Under Challenge Without Chargesheet or Cognizance Order: Allahabad High Court Possession Without Title Is Legally Insubstantial: Gujarat HC Dismisses Appeal By Dairy Cooperative Over Void Land Transfer You Can Prosecute a Former Director, But You Can’t Force Him to Represent the Company: Calcutta High Court Lays Down Clear Limits on Corporate Representation in PMLA Cases Conviction Cannot Rest on Tainted Testimony of Injured Witnesses in Isolation: Bombay High Court Acquits Five in Murder Case One Attesting Witness is Sufficient if He Proves Execution and Attestation of Will as Required by Law: AP High Court Land Acquisition | Delay Cannot Defeat Just Compensation: P&H High Court Grants Enhanced Compensation Despite 12-Year Delay in Review Petitions by Landowners Allegations Implausible, Motivated by Malice: Kerala High Court Quashes Rape Case After Finding Abuse Claims a Counterblast to Civil Dispute Adoptions Under Hindu Law Need No Approval from District Magistrate: Madras High Court Declares Administrative Rejection of Adoptive Birth Certificate as Illegal Findings of Fact Cannot Be Re-Appreciated in an Appeal Under Section 10F Companies Act: Madras High Court Equality Is Not A Mechanical Formula, But A Human Commitment: P&H High Court Grants Visually Impaired Mali Retrospective Promotions With Full Benefits Orissa High Court Rules Notice for No Confidence Motion Must Include Both Requisition and Resolution – Provision Held Mandatory Ashramam Built on Private Land, Managed by Family – Not a Public Religious Institution: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Endowments Notification Cruelty Must Be Proved, Not Presumed: Gujarat High Court Acquits Deceased Husband In 498A Case After 22 Years Trade Dress Protection Goes Beyond Labels: Calcutta High Court Affirms Injunction Over Coconut Oil Packaging Mimicry Mere Filing of Income Tax Returns Does Not Exonerate the Accused: Madras High Court Refuses Discharge to Wife of Public Servant in ₹2 Crore DA Case

"Discharge of Probationary Constable Not Punitive but Simpliciter," Rules Supreme Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


New Delhi, September 5, 2023 - In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India clarified the legal framework surrounding the discharge of probationary constables. The Court ruled that the discharge of Jaswant Singh, a probationary constable with the Punjab Police, was "simpliciter and not punitive in nature."

The Bench, comprising Justices J.K. Maheshwari and K.V. Viswanathan, delivered the judgment on September 5, 2023. The case revolved around Rule 12.21 of the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 (PPR), which allows for the discharge of a constable found unlikely to prove an efficient police officer within three years of enrolment.

"In our considered view, all the three Courts misconstrued Rule 12.21 of PPR and decreed the suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff," the Court observed. The judgment further stated, "Looking to the contents of the order of discharge, in the considered opinion of this Court, there is no foundation of misconduct alleged in the order and it is an order of simpliciter discharge of a probationer constable."

Jaswant Singh was discharged from the Punjab Police during his probation period, which he challenged on the grounds of a violation of the principles of natural justice. Both the First Appellate Court and the High Court had previously upheld Singh's claim, dismissing the State's appeal. They held that the discharge was not legally sustainable and granted all service benefits to Singh.

However, the Supreme Court set aside the judgments of the High Court and lower courts. "For the reasons discussed above, we are of the considered opinion that the view taken by the High Court and also by the two courts below is completely erroneous in law and must be set-aside," the Court concluded.

The judgment cited various precedents to distinguish between "simpliciter termination" and "punitive termination," emphasizing the need to examine the "nature" and "purpose" of the inquiry leading to termination.

Date of Decision: September 5, 2023

THE STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS vs JASWANT SINGH        

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/05-Sep-2023_State_Vs_Jaswant.pdf"]

Latest Legal News