Order XLI Rule 23A CPC | Re-Trial Necessary When Crucial Parties Impleaded In Appeal: Telangana High Court Cannot Freeze Entire Bank Account For Small Disputed Sums: Rajasthan High Court Issues Comprehensive Guidelines Against Indiscriminate Account Freezes In Cyber Crime Probes 187(3) BNSS | No Extension Of Investigation Time Without Notice To Accused: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Default Bail In NDPS Case Road Widening Under Master Plan Cannot Be Stalled For Formal Land Acquisition, Section 305 Permits Direct Removal Of Encroachments: Madhya Pradesh High Court P&H High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over 45-Day Delay In Informing Detenu Of Right To Represent 'Sole Allegation Of Torture Cannot Stand Alone': Andhra Pradesh High Court Acquits Husband Under Section 498A IPC After Dowry Demand Disproved Seeking Corroboration To Victim's Testimony Amounts To Adding Insult To Injury: Bombay High Court Upholds Rape Conviction Offences Of Cheating & Criminal Breach Of Trust Cannot Coexist On Same Facts: Calcutta High Court Quashes FIR Over Commercial Contract Dispute "Accident Alone Is Not Proof": Delhi High Court Acquits Bus Driver In 2003 Road Fatality Case, Rules Mere Speeding Or Collision Insufficient For Section 304A IPC Mandate Of Regulations Must Be Read Into Public Notices: Kerala High Court Reverses Order Directing NMC To Reopen Portal For Medical College's PG Seat Hike Unproven 1946 Oral Sale And Subsequent School Gift Cannot Convey Valid Title Over Tribal Land: Orissa High Court Orders Compensation After 80 Years ED Can Probe Money Laundering In J&K Corruption Cases: J&K High Court Rules S. 5(1)(d) J&K PC Act Corresponds To Amended S. 7 Of Central PC Act Not Mere Lip Service: Supreme Court Quashes GST Notice Under Section 74 Lacking Foundational Facts Of Fraud Or Suppression Selling Manufactured Goods At Factory Premises Doesn't Turn 'Industrial' Land Into 'Commercial' For Stamp Duty: Supreme Court Supreme Court Orders All States To Form Dedicated SITs To Probe Fake Motor Accident Claims, Warns Insurance Top Brass Against Selective Referrals Port Trusts Not Immune From Customs Duty On Pilfered Goods: Supreme Court Upholds Notification Declaring Mumbai Port Trust As Custodian Under Section 45

"Detenue's Rights Infringed Due to Failure to Provide Relevant Documents," Rules Karnataka High Court

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a judgment dated August 31, 2023, the High Court of Karnataka quashed detention orders, citing infringement of the detenue's rights due to procedural lapses. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements and constitutional provisions.

Justice Mohammad Nawaz and Justice Rajesh Rai K presided over the case, Writ Petition No. 201957/2023, involving Smt. Shrenika as the petitioner and the State of Karnataka among the respondents.

The court observed, "Failure to provide the detenue with relevant documents within the stipulated 21-day period infringes upon the detenue's rights to defend against illegal detention." [Para 7]

The judgment also highlighted the violation of Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India. "The sponsoring authority's failure to provide translated and legible copies of documents to the detenue withheld the detenue's right to make effective representation before the Government and Advisory Board," the court noted. [Para 22]

Discussing the role of the Advisory Board in detention cases, the court stated that the board's opinion is crucial for the continuation or revocation of detention. [Para 16]

In the final decision, the court quashed the detention orders passed by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and directed them to set the detenue at liberty. [Para 29]

Date of Decision 31st August 2023     

 SMT. SHRENIKA vs .THE STATE OF KARNATAKA,       

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Shrenika_vs_The_State_Of_Karnataka_And_Ors_on_31_August_2023_KarntHC.pdf"]

Latest Legal News