Appellate Court Must Re-Appreciate Evidence To Determine Lesser Offence Under Section 386 CrPC If Graver Charge Is Not Sustained: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Provisions Override Other Laws Including Principles Of Res Judicata: Supreme Court Right To Information Act | CCTV Footage Cannot Be Provided Directly To Applicant If It Falls Under Section 8(1)(g) Exemptions: Allahabad High Court Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is The Paramount Consideration In Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh High Court Inefficient Case Management By State Law Officers Impedes Justice: Allahabad High Court Directs Principal Secretary (Law) To Reform Procedures Section 24 CPC | Convenience Of Wife Is A Primary Consideration For Transfer Of Matrimonial Proceedings, But Virtual Appearance Can Mitigate Hardship: Andhra Pradesh High Court Son Cannot Claim Co-Ownership Or Resist Eviction Based On Alleged Financial Contribution To Property Purchased In Mother’s Name: Delhi High Court Order 33 Rule 1 CPC | Applicant Must Prove Inability To Pay Court Fee With Cogent Evidence; Mere Assertion Of Indigence Is Insufficient: Chhattisgarh High Court Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right To Possession, Cannot Rely Solely On Lacunae In Defendant’s Evidence: Delhi High Court Successor Cannot Remain Silent: Bombay High Court Upholds Tenant's Right To Purchase Agricultural Land, Rules Rejection Before 1961 Amendment No Bar Single Mother Has Right To Determine Child’s Surname And Alter Biological Father's Name In Birth Certificate: Calcutta High Court Court Can Sanction Professional Fees Of Valuers Exceeding Prescribed Ceiling Post-Assignment: Bombay High Court MACT | Appellate Court Can Reduce Compensation Even If Insurer’s Appeal Challenges Quantum While Claimant Seeks Enhancement: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order VI Rule 17 CPC | Amendment Of Written Statement To Correct Internal Inconsistencies Does Not Amount To Withdrawal Of Admission: Delhi High Court Oral Family Partition Valid Even If Unregistered: Jharkhand High Court Power Of Attorney Lacking Explicit Interest Is Revocable Regardless Of 'Irrevocable' Label: Gujarat High Court DRC Act | Summary Eviction Proceedings Cannot Be Converted Into Extended Litigation By Seeking To File Additional Documents Post-Pleadings: Delhi High Court

"Delhi High Court Upholds Regulation of Rural Transport Vehicles: 'No Further Orders Required,' Says Justice Prateek Jalan"

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court, led by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN, has upheld the regulation of rural transport vehicles, particularly addressing the issue of illegal plying of stage carriages on specified routes. The court's decision comes in response to two writ petitions filed by drivers/operators of Rural Transport Vehicles operating under the Gramin Sewa scheme.

The petitioners, represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Surabhi Mishra, and Mr. Akash Sahay, Advocates, sought a direction from the court to remove illegal vehicles operating as stage carriages on specific routes. These routes, covered under the Gramin Sewa scheme, include Route No. 60 (Mukandpur to Azadpur Delhi), GS-9 (Shastri Park Metro Station to Mandawli), and GS-147 (Jheel to Kalyanpuri).

The petitioners' arguments were based on a notification dated 11.12.2014, issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD), which prohibited the plying of e-rickshaws on 236 roads listed in the notification.

The court carefully examined the facts of the case, including status reports submitted by GNCTD, which acknowledged the presence of unauthorized vehicles on Gramin Sewa routes. GNCTD also detailed actions taken against these illegal vehicles, including challans, impoundment, and prosecutions for various violations.

Justice Prateek Jalan observed, "In view of the action taken thus far, and the assurance of GNCTD that regular action will be taken in respect of the grievances of the petitioner, I am of the view that no further orders are required in this writ petition."

The court further encouraged the petitioners to submit specific suggestions to the concerned Assistant Commissioner of Police (Traffic) for consideration and appropriate action.

With these observations, the Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petitions, indicating its confidence in GNCTD's commitment to addressing the petitioners' concerns.

This judgment reinforces the importance of regulatory measures in the transportation sector and highlights the court's role in ensuring compliance with the law.

Date of Decision: September 13, 2023

FAROOQ vs COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Arvind_Kumar_Vs_COMMISSIONER_OF_TRANSPORT_GNCT_Of_Delhi_And_ANR_HC_DLH.pdf"]

Latest Legal News