Section 151 CPC Cannot Be Invoked For Restoration Of Possession When Statutory Remedy Under Section 144 Exists: Calcutta High Court 'Mere Assertion Of Higher Rent By Landlord Cannot Oust DRC Act': Delhi High Court Sets Aside Eviction Decree, Remands Matter Back Sections 27 & 65B Evidence Act Flouted | Police Cannot Jeopardise Liberty On Surmises: Supreme Court Awards ₹6 Lakh Reparation To Acquitted Undertrial Jailed For 6 Years RTI Act | Registrar Can Access Co-Operative Society Records For Information Applicant Without Prior Inquiry Satisfaction: Supreme Court Textiles Committee Act | Job Work Processing Of Handloom/Powerloom Fabric Not 'Manufacture', Cannot Borrow Definition From Central Excise Act: Supreme Court Order 21 CPC | Executing Court Must Adjudicate Third-Party Claims, Separate Suit Explicitly Barred Under Rule 101: Supreme Court Wakf Act | Gazette Notification Under Sec 5(2) Final If Unchallenged Within Limitation; Suit For Injunction Maintainable Without Title Declaration: Supreme Court Land Acquisition Act | Acquisition For Housing Society Requires Prior Approval Of Concrete Layout Scheme; Fraud Overrides Res Judicata & Delay: Supreme Court Electricity Act | Consumers Facing Power Theft Charges Entitled To Procedural Safeguards Under Section 126; Can File Objections & Appeal Under Section 127: Supreme Court SARFAESI Act | Supreme Court Directs Full & Final Settlement Of Debt Assigned To ARC To Save Running Enterprise, Disposes Section 7 IBC Proceedings IBC | CoC Cannot Withdraw Approved Resolution Plan From NCLT Merely Because Corporate Debtor's Financial Position Improved: Supreme Court Mere Presence As Customer At Spa Centre Does Not Attract Offences Under Sections 3, 4 & 5 Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act: Andhra Pradesh High Court Section 376 IPC | Absence Of External Injuries Or Semen Does Not Discredit Credible Testimony Of Prosecutrix; Minor's Consent Immaterial: Allahabad High Court Probate Cannot Be Denied Merely Due To Disinheritance Of Natural Heirs If Propounder Successfully Removes Suspicious Circumstances: Bombay High Court Challenge To Decades-Old Patta Cancellation Barred By Delay & Laches; Litigant Sleeping Over Rights Cannot Unsettle Settled Position: Kerala High Court POCSO | Conviction Cannot Be Sustained On Victim’s Testimony If Found Inconsistent With FIR And Section 164 CrPC Statements: Calcutta High Court Preventive Detention | Unexplained Delay And Failure To Seek Cancellation Of Bail Vitiate Detention Order: Kerala High Court Once Execution & Attestation Are Proved, Suspicion Of Delay No Longer Operates: Bombay High Court Grants Probate In 26-Year-Old Will Dispute Tenant Cannot Claim Valid Surrender Of Premises By Handing Over Keys To One Co-Owner Who Is Also Company Director: Delhi High Court Taxation Law | Assessee Cannot Challenge Show Cause Notice After Opting For Settlement Commission: Delhi High Court Order 21 Rule 10 CPC | Decree For Mere Declaration Not Executable, Executing Court Cannot Direct Recovery Without Consequential Relief: Madhya Pradesh High Court Section 65B Indian Evidence Act | Electronic Records Not Accompanied By Certificate Are Inadmissible; Oral Evidence Cannot Substitute Mandatory Statutory Compliance: Madras High Court Reservation Beyond 50% Ceiling Without Extraordinary Circumstances Violates Articles 14, 15 And 16: Karnataka High Court Magistrate Can Take Cognizance Of Hate Speech Delivered In Closed Premises If Circulated On Social Media: Madras High Court No Development Cut Applicable On Land Acquisition Compensation When Both Acquired Land And Exemplar Are Small Plots: Punjab & Haryana High Court 'Extremely Barbaric': Orissa High Court Commutes Death Sentence To Life Imprisonment For Man Who Stabbed Wife 49 Times Motor Vehicles Act | Breach Of Licence Condition Doesn't Absolve Insurer Of Statutory Liability Towards Third Parties; 'Pay & Recover' Applies: Punjab & Haryana High Court Is Prior Notice To Judgment Debtor Mandatory In Possession Or Eviction Executions Filed Within Two Years? MP High Court Refers Question To Larger Bench Section 5 Limitation Act Inapplicable To Persona Designata; Quasi-Judicial Appellate Authority Cannot Condone Delay Absent Express Enabling Provision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

"Delhi High Court Upholds Regulation of Rural Transport Vehicles: 'No Further Orders Required,' Says Justice Prateek Jalan"

07 May 2024 2:49 AM

By: Admin


In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court, led by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN, has upheld the regulation of rural transport vehicles, particularly addressing the issue of illegal plying of stage carriages on specified routes. The court's decision comes in response to two writ petitions filed by drivers/operators of Rural Transport Vehicles operating under the Gramin Sewa scheme.

The petitioners, represented by Mr. Arvind Kumar, Ms. Surabhi Mishra, and Mr. Akash Sahay, Advocates, sought a direction from the court to remove illegal vehicles operating as stage carriages on specific routes. These routes, covered under the Gramin Sewa scheme, include Route No. 60 (Mukandpur to Azadpur Delhi), GS-9 (Shastri Park Metro Station to Mandawli), and GS-147 (Jheel to Kalyanpuri).

The petitioners' arguments were based on a notification dated 11.12.2014, issued by the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD), which prohibited the plying of e-rickshaws on 236 roads listed in the notification.

The court carefully examined the facts of the case, including status reports submitted by GNCTD, which acknowledged the presence of unauthorized vehicles on Gramin Sewa routes. GNCTD also detailed actions taken against these illegal vehicles, including challans, impoundment, and prosecutions for various violations.

Justice Prateek Jalan observed, "In view of the action taken thus far, and the assurance of GNCTD that regular action will be taken in respect of the grievances of the petitioner, I am of the view that no further orders are required in this writ petition."

The court further encouraged the petitioners to submit specific suggestions to the concerned Assistant Commissioner of Police (Traffic) for consideration and appropriate action.

With these observations, the Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petitions, indicating its confidence in GNCTD's commitment to addressing the petitioners' concerns.

This judgment reinforces the importance of regulatory measures in the transportation sector and highlights the court's role in ensuring compliance with the law.

Date of Decision: September 13, 2023

FAROOQ vs COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORT GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR

[gview file="https://lawyer-e-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Arvind_Kumar_Vs_COMMISSIONER_OF_TRANSPORT_GNCT_Of_Delhi_And_ANR_HC_DLH.pdf"]

Latest Legal News