(1)
SUDHA RENUKAIAH ..... Vs.
STATE OF A.P. .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2017
Facts: The case involved the murder of two individuals, with charges against 19 accused persons. Initially, the trial court acquitted all accused, giving them the benefit of the doubt due to a purported lack of evidence. Subsequently, the State and the complainant filed appeals and revisions challenging the acquittal.Issues:Whether the trial court's acquittal of all accused was based on a per...
(2)
UNION OF INDIA ..... Vs.
SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LTD. .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2017
Facts:Simplex Infrastructures Ltd., the Respondent, was awarded a construction contract by the Union of India, the Appellant.Disputes arose, leading to arbitration proceedings, where the Arbitrator ruled in favor of Simplex Infrastructures Ltd.The Union of India filed a petition to set aside the arbitral award before the District Court at Port Blair, which was held not maintainable.Simplex Infrast...
(3)
VANEET MAHAJAN ..... Vs.
STATE OF PUNJAB .....Respondent D.D
13/04/2017
Facts: The appellant, Vaneet Mahajan, was the complainant in a case where he, along with his brother and an employee, was attacked by a group of individuals armed with deadly weapons. The attack was allegedly orchestrated by a cabinet minister in the Punjab government. The appellant suffered several injuries, including grievous ones, leading to the registration of a criminal case under various sec...
(4)
ANANT SINGH @ ANANT KUMAR SINGH ..... Vs.
STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2017
Facts:Anant Singh @ Anant Kumar Singh, the appellant, was preventively detained under the Bihar Control of Crimes Act, 1981, on 21.9.2016, for a maximum period of one year.The appellant was alleged to be involved in 31 grave crimes, including murder, attempt to murder, and kidnapping, and had been in jail since 24.6.2015.A previous preventive detention order dated 5.9.2016 was revoked due to lack ...
(5)
ANIL KUMAR DADURAO DHEKLE ..... Vs.
RUKHIBEN .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2017
Facts:Anil Kumar Dadurao Dhekale (the appellant) sought eviction of the respondents from his property under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.The original tenant, Manilal Ishwarbhai Valand, defaulted on rent payments, leading to a notice from the appellant.The appellant filed a Rent Suit No.499 of 1978 seeking possession of the property and arrears of rent.The trial...
(6)
PALURE BHASKAR RAO ETC. ETC ..... Vs.
P. RAMASESHAIAH & ORS ETC. .....Respondent D.D
12/04/2017
Facts: The case revolves around the interpretation of the Andhra Pradesh Police Subordinate Service Rules and the Andhra Pradesh Police Service Rules, specifically regarding eligibility for appointment as Inspector under the A.P. Police Service.Issues: The eligibility criteria for appointment as Inspector, particularly whether service rendered as Reserve Sub-Inspectors should be counted towards th...
(7)
DALIP KAUR BRAR ..... Vs.
GURU GRANTH SAHIB SEWA MISSION (REGD.) .....Respondent D.D
11/04/2017
Facts:A lease agreement was executed between the appellant-landlord and respondents-tenants for a period of three years with specified rent. The landlord filed an eviction application under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, alleging arrears of rent from a certain date. The Rent Controller made a provisional assessment of the rent due, which the tenants failed to compl...
(8)
DENTAL COUNCIL OF INDIA Vs.
DR. HEDGEWAR SMRUTI RUGNA SEVA MANDAL, HINGOLI ...Respondent D.D
11/04/2017
Facts:The Dental Council of India (DCI) conducted assessments of a dental college regarding its eligibility to start post-graduate courses.The college's scheme for post-graduate courses was disapproved by the Government of India based on recommendations from the DCI.The college approached the High Court seeking relief against the disapproval, and the High Court passed an interim order staying...
(9)
ENERGY WATCHDOG ..... Vs.
CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION D.D
11/04/2017
Facts: The case involved a dispute regarding the determination of tariff for the supply of power from power projects governed by Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) between State Government Utilities and power generating companies. The dispute arose due to a change in Indonesian law, which increased the export price of coal from Indonesia to the international market.Issues: Whether the change in Indo...