(1)
N.T.P.C. Renewable Energy ...Petitioner Vs.
The Board of Revenue, Ajmer And Others ...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Civil Law - Land Allotment for Renewable Energy Project – Challenge to Legality – Petitioner was allotted land by the State Government for establishing a solar power project – Private respondents challenged the allotment before the revenue courts – Assistant Collector refused interim relief to respondents – However, Revenue Appellate Authority granted ad-interim injun...
(2)
Pawan Kumar ...Petitioner Vs.
Inspector (Preventive) Central Goods and Services Tax ...Respondent D.D
05/03/2025
Criminal Law - Default Bail – Stringent Conditions – Violation of Fundamental Rights – Petitioner was granted default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC due to the prosecution’s failure to file a charge sheet within 60 days – However, bail conditions included an excessive surety bond of ₹1.10 crore and a bank guarantee of ₹55 lakh – Petitioner challenged these c...
(3)
Central Board of Trustees (EPF) through Regional Provident Fund Commissioner ...Petitioner Vs.
The Registrar Central Government Industrial Tribunal Kolkata & Another ...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Civil Law - Provident Fund – Levy of Damages for Delayed Remittance – Whether Mandatory – The Tribunal set aside damages under Section 14B citing lack of willful default—Held: Mens rea is not required for imposing damages under Section 14B—Authority must consider aggravating and mitigating factors but cannot mechanically waive damages—Tribunal’s order set ...
(4)
Arvind Yadav & Another...Petitioners Vs.
State of Uttar Pradesh & Others...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Criminal Law – Repetitive Complaints by Informant – Pattern of False Allegations – CBI Inquiry Ordered - The petitioners sought quashing of an FIR lodged by the informant, Pooja Rawat, under various provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Information Technology Act, 2008 – The petitioners argued that the informant had previously filed 11 similar complaints ...
(5)
Vijaya Vaishnavi Sriram...Petitioner Vs.
State of Tamil Nadu...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Constitutional Validity of Section 13 – Right to Legal Representation – Family Courts Act – Upheld
The petitioner challenged Section 13 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, arguing that it violates the fundamental right of legal practitioners under the Advocates Act, 1961, and restricts litigants' ability to be represented by lawyers in Family Courts – The Court held that...
(6)
Bhupendrabhai Nagjibhai Jogiyani ...Petitioner Vs.
Lakshmanbhai Haribhai & Ors. ...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Civil Law – Challenge Ex-Parte Order - Service of Summons – Valid Service Through Adult Family Member – Order V Rule 15 CPC – The defendant challenged the service of summons, arguing that notice was served on his wife and not personally on him – The Court held that service of summons on an adult family member is valid when the defendant is unavailable and there is no ...
(7)
Raman Kumar ...Petitioner Vs.
State of Punjab ...Respondent D.D
05/03/2025
Criminal Law – Anticipatory Bail – Injury Not Grievous – Bail Granted – Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving an attack with deadly weapons—Prosecution alleged he inflicted a sword blow on the victim’s right arm—Held: Petitioner was not the main accused, and the grievous injury was attributed to co-accused—Considering absence of pri...
(8)
State Bank of Patiala...Petitioner Vs.
M/s Shri Balaji Contractor & Suppliers and Another...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Civil Court Jurisdiction – Bar under Section 34 SARFAESI Act – Rejection of Plaint Allowed – Civil Suit Not Maintainable – Plaintiff filed suit seeking recovery or adjustment of goods value post-bank's possession under SARFAESI – Trial Court rejected bank’s application citing late stage – Held: Jurisdictional objection can be raised at any stage &ndash...
(9)
ASI Naresh Kumar ...Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and another ...Respondents D.D
05/03/2025
Civil Writ - Expunging Remarks – Scope of Judicial Commentary – Trial Court Observations Against Non-Party Officer – Not Interfered With - The petitioner, a police officer, sought expunging of remarks made against him by the Trial Court despite not being an accused or witness – The Trial Court had only directed the Superintendent of Police to conduct an inquiry based on the...