Anticipatory Bail – Allegation of Abetment to Suicide – Grant of Interim Protection – Bail Granted - Petitioners (wife and son of deceased) sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in FIR No. 431/2024 under Sections 306/34 IPC – Allegations included harassment of deceased and forced consumption of poison – Petitioners contended deceased had psychiatric illnesses, committed unnatural sexual acts, and had earlier been booked under FIR No. 428/2024 based on wife’s complaint – Deceased allegedly circulated a suicide note via WhatsApp blaming petitioners – Court considered long-standing psychiatric treatment records (since 1998), abusive behaviour by deceased, existence of prior FIR, and absence of custodial necessity – Held: Petitioners not required for custodial interrogation, anticipatory bail granted with conditions [Paras 1, 6-8, 13-18].

Bail - NDPS Offense – Commercial Quantity – Application of Section 37 – Bail Granted – Petitioner accused of possessing 71 Buprenorphine injections, constituting commercial quantity under FSL report – Despite applicability of statutory bar under Section 37, prolonged incarceration of 1 year and 5 months invoked constitutional protection under Article 21 – Held: Bail granted subject to strict conditions [Paras 6-11].

Clean Antecedents – No Prior Criminal Record – Considered Favorably – Petitioner had no criminal history and undertook not to indulge in any future NDPS Act offense – Assurance accepted as mitigating factor justifying conditional release [Paras 2, 4].

Prolonged Pre-trial Custody – Grounds for Bail – Article 21 Consideration – Noted by Court that trial had not commenced and petitioner was in custody for over 1.5 years – Delay in trial held to be unjustified restraint on liberty – Conditional liberty granted to ensure fairness and avoid irreversible injustice [Paras 10-13].

Comparative Precedents – Supreme Court Bail Orders Followed – Cited series of SC judgments including Chitta Biswas, Rajib Dey, and Tajmul SK cases granting bail in commercial quantity NDPS cases with long incarceration – Held: Constitutional guarantee of liberty prevails over statutory embargo when trial delay is substantial [Paras 9, 11, 12].

Firearm Restrictions – Bail Condition – Court imposed prohibition on possession of arms post-release, citing need to protect society and deter intimidation of witnesses – This measure based on preponderance of probability rather than certainty [Para 20].

Decision – Petition Allowed – Bail Granted – Regular bail granted to petitioner under strict compliance terms including personal bond, prohibition on weapon possession, and cooperation with trial – State at liberty to seek cancellation of bail upon any future NDPS offense by petitioner [Paras 15-26].
 

Taxation Law - Wealth Tax – Urban Land – Building Under Construction – Taxability Upheld - ITAT excluded respondent’s land under construction from wealth tax by relying on Rohini Hotels case – High Court held this reliance misplaced in light of Supreme Court’s later decision in Giridhar G. Yadalam v. CWT which reversed Rohini Hotels – Held: Land with partially constructed buildings does not qualify for exclusion under Section 2(ea); exemption applies only when building is fully constructed and approved – Appeals allowed, ITAT orders set aside [Paras 3–23].

Bail – Jurisdiction of Magistrate – Offences under SC/ST Act and IPC Section 409 – Bail Order Set Aside - The learned Magistrate rejected remand of accused but also granted bail in offences triable by Sessions/Special Court including under SC/ST Act and Section 409 IPC – Held: Though rejection of remand was within discretion of Magistrate, granting bail was beyond jurisdiction – Victim not heard as required under Section 15A(3) SC/ST Act – High Court held Magistrate’s order granting bail without jurisdiction was legally unsustainable – Appeal partly allowed; remand rejection upheld, bail order set aside [Paras 6-13].

Insurance Claim – Non-Disclosure of Previous Policy – Proposal Form Left Blank – Claim Allowed - Petitioner’s wife died of heart attack; LIC repudiated death claim citing non-disclosure of earlier policy taken three months prior – Proposal form had column for previous policies left blank, allegedly under LIC agent’s advice – Court held: Mere omission in column 9 not deliberate suppression; LIC already held policy data, and failure to verify or seek clarification before issuing policy bond constituted waiver – Held: No fraudulent intent proved; rejection arbitrary and contrary to Section 45 and SC rulings – Impugned orders set aside; LIC directed to release insured amount within six weeks [Paras 10–28].

Quashing Proclamation Proceedings – Non-Compliance with Section 82 Cr.P.C. – Declaration of Proclaimed Person Quashed – The petitioner was declared proclaimed person in proceedings under Section 138 NI Act and consequent FIR under Section 174-A IPC was registered – Held: Trial Court erred in straightaway issuing proclamation without prior steps of summons or bailable warrants, and without recording satisfaction regarding absconding – Proclamation proceedings vitiated due to non-compliance with Section 82 Cr.P.C. – Impugned order and FIR quashed [Paras 1-3, 12].

Cognizance under Section 174-A IPC – Bar under Section 195 Cr.P.C. – Prosecution Unsustainable – The Court held that offences under Section 174-A IPC are governed by the bar under Section 195(1)(a)(i) Cr.P.C. – Cognizance requires a written complaint by the concerned public servant and cannot be initiated by police report – Registration of FIR without a complaint violates mandatory procedural law – Proceedings under Section 174-A IPC quashed [Paras 7-10].

Mandatory Procedure under Law – Adherence to Article 21 – Due Process Violated – The Court emphasized adherence to fair procedure as integral to personal liberty under Article 21 – When law prescribes a manner for action, deviation renders subsequent proceedings void – Directing initiation of criminal action without following the statutorily prescribed complaint procedure under Section 195 Cr.P.C. is illegal [Paras 11].

Decision – Petition Allowed – Order declaring petitioner proclaimed person, consequential FIR and all subsequent proceedings quashed – Trial Court directed to proceed in accordance with law, ensuring procedural compliance under Section 82 Cr.P.C. and Section 195 Cr.P.C. [Paras 14].

Criminal Law – Quashing of FIR – Allegations of Sexual Harassment and Intimidation – Petition Dismissed – Petitioner sought quashing of FIR under Sections 354, 354A, 506 IPC, alleging false implication by his niece-in-law – The Court noted that FIR disclosed specific acts of molestation and intimidation occurring over a sustained period – Held: Allegations, if taken at face value, prima facie disclosed commission of cognizable offences – Mere absence of such claims in parallel proceedings or assertions of malafide cannot justify quashing at preliminary stage – Petition dismissed [Paras 2–13].

Anticipatory Bail – Sections 177, 420, 506, 120B of the IPC - Section 67 of the Information Technology Act - Criminal Antecedents Disclosed in Second Petition – Maintainability – Petitioner, who had earlier withdrawn the bail petition for non-disclosure of criminal record, re-approached the Court with full disclosure – Held: Petition was maintainable and considered on merits [Paras 1–2].

Illegal Security Operations – Allegation of Unlicensed Security Agency – Bail Not Denied Solely for Lack of Uniform Submission – Petitioner was accused of running an unlicensed agency and defaming the complainant’s business online – Co-accused arrested but petitioner not pursued for custody – Held: Custodial interrogation not justified at this stage – Anticipatory bail granted subject to conditions [Paras 3–10].

Misuse of the Term “Bouncer” – Legal and Social Concerns – Judicial Observation – Court critically analyzed misuse of the word "bouncer" in private security roles – Highlighted the shift from civil protection to aggression and lawlessness – Emphasized on statutory terminology and duties under PSAR Act, 2005 and Punjab Rules, 2007 – Urged State to discourage such terminology and restore dignity to security personnel roles [Paras 11–24].

Decision – Anticipatory Bail Granted – Petition allowed with direction to cooperate with investigation and conditions imposed for future appearance – Remarks made are not to influence the trial – All pending applications disposed of [Paras 9–10, 25].

Criminal Law – Murder and Robbery – Appeal Against Conviction - Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory – Conviction Confirmed - Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 392 IPC for murdering their employer and robbing his belongings – Prosecution relied on 'last seen together' evidence, mobile phone data, recovery of gold chain from jeweler, and blood-stained clothing – Court found that circumstantial chain was complete and unbroken – Held: No explanation provided by accused consistent with innocence; prosecution established guilt beyond reasonable doubt – Conviction and life sentence upheld [Paras 2–18].