(1)
M/s Microtek Buildwell Private Limited – Petitioner Vs.
State of Haryana and others - Respondents D.D
18/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Stamp Duty – Proceedings under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 – Limitation period for initiating proceedings – Whether proceedings initiated after a period of more than 9 years from the execution of the sale deed are time-barred – Held, proceedings clearly barred by limitation as per Section 47-A(3) of the Indian Stamp Act, which provides a three-year limitation...
(2)
PRADEEP SINGH RAWAT ..... Petitioner Vs.
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents D.D
18/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Promotion of government servant – Clearance regarding pending disciplinary proceedings required before confirmation – Failure to provide complete particulars of pending criminal case – “Sealed cover procedure” not followed – Fault of the respondents – Review DPC constituted to rectify the mistake – Petitioner entitled to ad-hoc promotion. [Para 32-50...
(3)
TARUN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Vs.
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
..... Respondent D.D
18/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Bail application – Money laundering case – Involvement in fraudulent activities of a company – Application seeking bail in a case related to money laundering and fraudulent increase of inventory in a company – Applicant alleged to have aided in the diversion of loan funds and fraudulent activities – Charges under the Prevention of Corruption Act and IPC – Applic...
(4)
The State of Jharkhand & other's ...PITITIONER Vs.
Kundan Kandil ...Respondents D.D
18/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Intra-Court Appeal – Delay Condonation – Sufficiency of Cause – Dismissal of Appeal – Interpretation of “Sufficient Cause” – Principles for Considering Delay Condonation – Importance of Bona Fide Motive – Application for Delay Condonation Not Merely a Formality – Excerpts from the Hon’ble Apex Court Judgments Emphasizing Rigour of L...
(5)
State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP ----Petitioner Vs.
Suresh Kumar S/o Shri Mangilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gram Kandewali Thana Naraina Dist. Jaipur AND OTHERS ----Respondent D.D
18/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Criminal Appeal - Conviction and Sentencing - Rape and Murder of a Minor - Commutation of Death Penalty to Life Imprisonment - Aggravating and Mitigating Circumstances - Applicability of Death Penalty - Principles Governing Imposition of Death Sentence - Reference to Previous Cases - Proportionality Principle. [Para 1-58]
Conviction - Multiple Offences - Sections 363, 302, 201 of IPC,...
(6)
MRS SHARDA RELAN ..... Appellant Vs.
STATE & ORS ..... Respondents D.D
17/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Probate – Grant of probate of registered Will – Validity and execution of Will – Petitioner filed a petition seeking probate of the registered Will executed by her deceased husband – Two sons of the deceased filed objections, one raised no objections – No objections from the public – Petitioner claimed that the deceased executed the Will with respect to all his ...
(7)
MUKESH BHARDWAJ ..... Applicant Vs.
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent D.D
17/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. – Applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No. 136/2012 registered at PS Economic Offences Wing (EOW) – Allegations of fraud and misappropriation of funds against the accused – Accused not named in the FIR - Applicant arrested based on his association with the financial company M/s. B.P. Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. And M/s. Money Bhandar –...
(8)
Raman Masih …..Appellant(s) Vs.
State of J&K .…. Respondent(s) D.D
16/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Examination of accused under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code - Importance of putting material circumstances to the accused - Failure to put incriminating evidence to the accused constitutes a serious irregularity - Prejudice caused to the accused - Curability of the defect depends on various factors, including the passage of time since the incident - Unjust to remand the case after a si...
(9)
M/S WIPRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED ...PETITIONERS
& other's Vs.
M/S MARIYAS SOAPS AND CHEMICALS ...RESPONDENTS
& other's D.D
15/07/2023
HIGH COURTS
Trade Marks Act, 1999 – Sections 28(1), 28(3), and 27(2) – Passing off action – Infringement of registered trademark – Prohibitory injunction – Interplay between registered proprietors of identical or nearly resembling trademarks – Exclusive right to use a registered trademark – Right to bring an action for passing off goods or services not affected by reg...