Fairness Demands Compensation Under the 2013 Act; Bureaucratic Delays Cannot Defeat Justice: Supreme Court Competition Commission Must Issue Notice to Both Parties in a Combination Approval: Supreme Court Physical Possession and Settled Possession Are Prerequisites for Section 6 Relief: Delhi High Court Quashes Trial Court’s Decision Granting Possession Hyper-Technical Approach Must Be Avoided in Pre-Trial Amendments: Punjab & Haryana High Court FIR Lodged After Restitution of Conjugal Rights Suit Appears Retaliatory: Calcutta High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Case Two-Year Immunity from No-Confidence Motion Applies to Every Elected Sarpanch, Not Just the First in Office: Bombay High Court Enforcing The Terms Of  Agreement Does Not Amount To Contempt Of Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Quashes Contempt Order Against Power Company Officers Consent of a minor is immaterial under law: Allahabad High Court Rejects Bail Plea of Man Accused of Enticing Minor Sister-in-Law and Dowry Harassment False Promise of Marriage Does Not Automatically Amount to Rape: Supreme Court Quashes FIR Under Section 376 IPC Limitation Under Section 166(3) of Motor Vehicles Act Applies Prospectively: Orissa High Court Benevolent Legislation Must Be Interpreted in Favor of Victims Mere Reproduction of Assessee’s Computation Does Not Imply Application of Mind: Bombay High Court Affirms CIT’s Power to Revise Erroneous Assessment Order Bail | When Trial Delay is Solely Attributable to the Prosecution, Liberty Must Prevail Over Statutory Embargo: Kerala High Court BPL Status Must Be Proven Before Advertisement Date: Madhya Pradesh High Court Upholds Cancellation of Aanganwadi Worker’s Appointment Over BPL Bonus Marks Dispute Revocation of Succession Certificate Not Permissible, But Heirs Must Receive Their Due Share: Calcutta High Court Income Tax | Reassessment Cannot Be Used as a Tool for Harassment: Delhi High Court Slams Revenue for Reopening Case Without Fresh Material An Ad-hoc Employee Cannot Be Arbitrarily Replaced Without Justification: Gujarat High Court Questions Discriminatory Action Against Forensic Science Professor Mere Past Possession is Insufficient – Plaintiff Must Establish Possession on the Date of Suit For Injunction: Andhra Pradesh High Court Allahabad High Court Affirms Civil Court Jurisdiction under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act in Cancelling Sale Deed Based on Fraudulent Power of Attorney Right to Health Is a Fundamental Right Under Article 21: Karnataka High Court Cheque Bounce Conviction Can Be Set Aside If Dispute Is Settled Even at Revisional Stage: Madras High Court

"CIVIL" Digest

Constitutional Law – Article 131 Jurisdiction – State of West Bengal challenges the authority of the CBI to register cases post-withdrawal of consent under Section 6 of the DSPE Act – Issue involves interpretation of Article 131 and its limitations – Supreme Court's original jurisdiction exclusive and includes disputes involving the existence or extent of a legal right ...

Specific Performance – Readiness and Willingness – The appellant-defendant challenged the High Court's judgment confirming the appellate court's order which granted specific performance to the plaintiff-respondent. The Supreme Court analyzed whether the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract as required under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act...

Constitutional Law – Legislative Competence – Manipur Parliamentary Secretary Act, 2012 (2012 Act) – The 2012 Act provided for the appointment, salary, and allowances of Parliamentary Secretaries in Manipur – The Act was challenged in the High Court of Manipur for lack of legislative competence – The 2012 Act was repealed by the Manipur Parliamentary Secretary (Appoin...

Land Acquisition – Compliance with Section 5A – The Supreme Court analyzed whether the procedures under Section 5A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, were duly followed. It emphasized that the Collector must provide an opportunity for personal hearing to the objectors and consider their objections with due application of mind. The failure to do so can vitiate the acquisition proceeding...

Land Acquisition – Compensation – Appellant owned land acquired for construction of a flood protection wall – Land Acquisition Officer awarded Rs. 5,61,000 per hectare – Appellant claimed higher compensation of Rs. 500 per sq. ft. – Reference Court enhanced compensation; High Court reversed and ordered refund with interest – Supreme Court held appellant entitled...

Land Acquisition – Quantum of Compensation – The appeals arose from a dispute regarding compensation for land acquired by NOIDA. The Supreme Court evaluated the determination of fair market value and enhancement of compensation from INR 222-233 per sq. yd. to INR 449 per sq. yd. by the High Court. The Court utilized the principle of guesstimation, emphasizing the need for a holistic vi...

Civil Procedure – Impleadment of Transferee Pendente Lite – The appellant purchased land during the pendency of a suit for declaration and injunction regarding the same land. The trial court dismissed his application for impleadment, a decision upheld by the High Court based on the doctrine of lis pendens under Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Supreme Court reverse...

Constitutional Law – Special Reservation – Tamil Nadu Special Reservation Act, 2021 providing 10.5% internal reservation for Vanniakula Kshatriyas within the MBCs and DNCs declared unconstitutional – No substantial basis for classifying Vanniakula Kshatriyas into a separate group from the remaining 115 communities within the MBCs and DNCs – Violation of Articles 14, 15, and...

Civil Service – Service Law - Performance Appraisal Report – Timeliness and Authority Discretion – The Supreme Court considered whether the delay by the Accepting Authority in completing the Performance Appraisal Report (PAR) for an Indian Administrative Services (IAS) officer breached the All India Services (Performance Appraisal Report) Rules, 2007. The dispute involved the var...

Remanding of Case: An order of remand should not be passed merely to send the proceedings back to the lower court or Tribunal. The Appellate Court must decide the appeal on its merits, especially when both sides have presented oral and documentary evidence. Remanding is only justified if the lower court failed to consider crucial evidence or made significant legal errors [Paras 1-88]​​​​. ...