"Party Autonomy is the Backbone of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Upholds Sole Arbitrator Appointment Despite Party’s Attempts to Frustrate Arbitration Proceedings    |     Reasonable Doubt Arising from Sole Testimony in Absence of Corroboration, Power Cut Compounded Identification Difficulties: Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case    |     ED Can Investigate Without FIRs: PH High Court Affirms PMLA’s Broad Powers    |     Accident Claim | Contributory Negligence Cannot Be Vicariously Attributed to Passengers: Supreme Court    |     Default Bail | Indefeasible Right to Bail Prevails: Allahabad High Court Faults Special Judge for Delayed Extension of Investigation    |     “Habitual Offenders Cannot Satisfy Bail Conditions Under NDPS Act”: Punjab & Haryana High Court Denies Bail to Accused with Extensive Criminal Record    |     Delhi High Court Denies Substitution for Son Due to 'Gross Unexplained Delay' of Over Six Years in Trademark Suit    |     Section 4B of the Tenancy Act Cannot Override Land Exemptions for Public Development: Bombay High Court    |     Suspicion, However High, Is Not a Substitute for Proof: Calcutta High Court Orders Reinstatement of Coast Guard Officer Dismissed on Suspicion of Forgery    |     Age Not Conclusively Proven, Prosecutrix Found to be a Consenting Party: Chhattisgarh High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case    |     'Company's Absence in Prosecution Renders Case Void': Himachal High Court Quashes Complaint Against Pharma Directors    |     Preventive Detention Cannot Sacrifice Personal Liberty on Mere Allegations: J&K High Court Quashes Preventive Detention of Local Journalist    |     J.J. Act | Accused's Age at Offense Critical - Juvenility Must Be Addressed: Kerala High Court Directs Special Court to Reframe Charges in POCSO Case    |     Foreign Laws Must Be Proved Like Facts: Delhi HC Grants Bail in Cryptocurrency Money Laundering Case    |    

“Writ Petition Dismissed Due to ‘Non-Compliance with Legislative Requirements for Religious Conversion’ in Inter-Religious Marriage Case”

04 September 2024 11:24 AM

By: Admin


Allahabad, August 29, 2023 — The Allahabad High Court, in a landmark decision today, dismissed a writ petition seeking protection from family interference in an inter-religious marriage and live-in relationship. The Hon’ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J., cited “non-compliance with legislative requirements for religious conversion” as per the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, as the primary reason for dismissal.

In the case titled Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others, the petitioners had approached the court for protection from interference by their family members, particularly respondent no. 6, who is the father of petitioner no. 1. The court acknowledged that both parties had reached the age of majority and are legally eligible for marriage. However, the court expressed reservations due to the lack of compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.

“Legal requirements for religious conversion under Section 8 and 9 of Act not complied with by petitioners,” the judgement stated. It also noted that the petitioners are distant cousins belonging to different religious communities, hence the question of re-conversion was not applicable here.

The court suggested that it’s “open to the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate for compliance of Section 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and seek necessary order under the Act.”

Though the writ petition was dismissed, the court has left the door open for the petitioners to take necessary legal steps as per the Act for future relief.

No specific past cases were cited in the judgement, making it a noteworthy standalone decision in the evolving legal landscape surrounding inter-religious marriages and conversions.

Date of Decision: 29th August 2023

Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Similar News