Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

“Writ Petition Dismissed Due to ‘Non-Compliance with Legislative Requirements for Religious Conversion’ in Inter-Religious Marriage Case”

04 September 2024 11:24 AM

By: Admin


Allahabad, August 29, 2023 — The Allahabad High Court, in a landmark decision today, dismissed a writ petition seeking protection from family interference in an inter-religious marriage and live-in relationship. The Hon’ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J., cited “non-compliance with legislative requirements for religious conversion” as per the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, as the primary reason for dismissal.

In the case titled Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others, the petitioners had approached the court for protection from interference by their family members, particularly respondent no. 6, who is the father of petitioner no. 1. The court acknowledged that both parties had reached the age of majority and are legally eligible for marriage. However, the court expressed reservations due to the lack of compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.

“Legal requirements for religious conversion under Section 8 and 9 of Act not complied with by petitioners,” the judgement stated. It also noted that the petitioners are distant cousins belonging to different religious communities, hence the question of re-conversion was not applicable here.

The court suggested that it’s “open to the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate for compliance of Section 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and seek necessary order under the Act.”

Though the writ petition was dismissed, the court has left the door open for the petitioners to take necessary legal steps as per the Act for future relief.

No specific past cases were cited in the judgement, making it a noteworthy standalone decision in the evolving legal landscape surrounding inter-religious marriages and conversions.

Date of Decision: 29th August 2023

Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Latest Legal News