Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

“Writ Petition Dismissed Due to ‘Non-Compliance with Legislative Requirements for Religious Conversion’ in Inter-Religious Marriage Case”

04 September 2024 11:24 AM

By: Admin


Allahabad, August 29, 2023 — The Allahabad High Court, in a landmark decision today, dismissed a writ petition seeking protection from family interference in an inter-religious marriage and live-in relationship. The Hon’ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J., cited “non-compliance with legislative requirements for religious conversion” as per the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, as the primary reason for dismissal.

In the case titled Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others, the petitioners had approached the court for protection from interference by their family members, particularly respondent no. 6, who is the father of petitioner no. 1. The court acknowledged that both parties had reached the age of majority and are legally eligible for marriage. However, the court expressed reservations due to the lack of compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.

“Legal requirements for religious conversion under Section 8 and 9 of Act not complied with by petitioners,” the judgement stated. It also noted that the petitioners are distant cousins belonging to different religious communities, hence the question of re-conversion was not applicable here.

The court suggested that it’s “open to the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate for compliance of Section 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and seek necessary order under the Act.”

Though the writ petition was dismissed, the court has left the door open for the petitioners to take necessary legal steps as per the Act for future relief.

No specific past cases were cited in the judgement, making it a noteworthy standalone decision in the evolving legal landscape surrounding inter-religious marriages and conversions.

Date of Decision: 29th August 2023

Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Latest Legal News