Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

“Writ Petition Dismissed Due to ‘Non-Compliance with Legislative Requirements for Religious Conversion’ in Inter-Religious Marriage Case”

04 September 2024 11:24 AM

By: Admin


Allahabad, August 29, 2023 — The Allahabad High Court, in a landmark decision today, dismissed a writ petition seeking protection from family interference in an inter-religious marriage and live-in relationship. The Hon’ble Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J., cited “non-compliance with legislative requirements for religious conversion” as per the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021, as the primary reason for dismissal.

In the case titled Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others, the petitioners had approached the court for protection from interference by their family members, particularly respondent no. 6, who is the father of petitioner no. 1. The court acknowledged that both parties had reached the age of majority and are legally eligible for marriage. However, the court expressed reservations due to the lack of compliance with Sections 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.

“Legal requirements for religious conversion under Section 8 and 9 of Act not complied with by petitioners,” the judgement stated. It also noted that the petitioners are distant cousins belonging to different religious communities, hence the question of re-conversion was not applicable here.

The court suggested that it’s “open to the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate for compliance of Section 8 and 9 of the U.P. Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021 and seek necessary order under the Act.”

Though the writ petition was dismissed, the court has left the door open for the petitioners to take necessary legal steps as per the Act for future relief.

No specific past cases were cited in the judgement, making it a noteworthy standalone decision in the evolving legal landscape surrounding inter-religious marriages and conversions.

Date of Decision: 29th August 2023

Smt. Shraddha @ Jannat And Another vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others

Latest Legal News