MACT | A Minor Cannot Be Treated as a Non-Earner: Punjab & Haryana High Court Consensual Love Affair Not Cheating Under IPC Section 417: Madras High Court Acquits Man Despite Paternity Confirmation Review Jurisdiction is an Ant-Hole in a Pigeon-Hol: Madras High Court Dismisses Review Plea Against Order Upholding Arbitral Award on Liquidated Damages Bank Can Freeze Guarantor’s Salary Account to Recover Loan Dues: Kerala High Court Clarifies CPC Exemption Does Not Apply to Banker’s Right Revenue Entry Calling Property ‘Ancestral’ Does Not Create Title: Gujarat High Court Upholds Registered Will in Second Appeal Licensee Cannot Resist Resumption Of Railway Land: Gauhati High Court Upholds Eviction For Amrit Bharat Station Scheme Mere Non-Payment of Business Dues Is Not Cheating: Calcutta High Court Protects Traders from Criminal Prosecution in Purely Civil Dispute Prosecution’s Failure to Prove Age of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Fatal to POCSO Conviction: Rajasthan High Court No Title, No Right, No Equity: Bombay High Court Demolishes Claim Over Footpath Stall, Imposes ₹5 Lakh Costs for Abuse of Process Section 155(2) Cr.P.C. Does Not Bar Complainant From Seeking Magistrate’s Permission: Allahabad High Court Clarifies Law on Non-Cognizable Investigations Un-Retracted Section 108 Statement Is Binding: Delhi High Court Declines to Reopen ₹3.5 Crore Cigarette Smuggling Valuation Section 34 Is Not an Appeal in Disguise: Delhi High Court Upholds 484-Day Extension in IRCON–Afcons Tunnel Arbitration Section 432(2) Cannot Be Rendered Fatuous: Calcutta High Court Reasserts Balance Between Judicial Opinion and Executive Discretion in Remission Matters Termination of Mandate Is Not Termination of Arbitration: Bombay High Court Revives Reference and Appoints Substitute Arbitrator CBI Can’t Prosecute When Bank Suffers No Loss: Andhra Pradesh High Court Discharges Bhimavaram Hospitals Directors in ₹1.5 Crore SBI Case Section 256 CrPC Cannot Be A Shield For An Accused Who Never Faced Trial: Allahabad High Court Restores 8 Cheque Bounce Complaints

Wife's Insistence on Separating Husband from Parents Without Reason is Cruelty-Calcutta HC

03 September 2024 9:46 AM

By: Admin


The Calcutta High Court has ruled that it is common for Indian sons to reside with their parents even after marriage, and that a wife must have a justifiable reason for separating her husband from his parents. Justices Soumen Sen and Uday Kumar made the decision while hearing a plea from a woman challenging a court order that granted her husband a divorce on grounds of cruelty.

The court noted that there were unjustifiable reasons for the wife's attempt to separate her husband from his family. It cited instances of ego clashes over petty domestic issues and challenges related to fulfilling financial requirements.

The husband had moved out of his parents' house and into a rented one for the sake of his matrimonial peace, and the court noted that the wife's persistent efforts to separate him from his family would be torturous for him.

The bench further stated that a son's duty towards his parents is sacred and that it is customary for Indian families to live together. The court emphasized that a wife cannot demand that her husband break away from his parents without a valid reason.

In dismissing the wife's plea, the court upheld the importance of family ties and recognized the cultural significance of multi-generational living in India.

The ruling reinforces the notion that marriage does not mean severing ties with one's parents and upholds the traditional values of Indian families.

JHARNA MANDAL Vs. PRASHANT KUMAR MANDAL

Latest Legal News