Rigours of UAPA Melt Before Article 21: Jharkhand High Court Grants Bail After Six Years of Incarceration Accused Cannot Challenge in Arguments What He Never Challenged in Cross-Examination: Himachal Pradesh High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction Counterblast Plea, Civil Dispute Defence No Shield When Cognizable Offence Is Disclosed: Allahabad High Court Refuses To Quash FIR Against Ex-Driver Accused Of Outraging Modesty Lawyers Who Burned a Colleague's Furniture for Defending Toll Workers Have Tainted a Noble Profession: Supreme Court A Suspicious Dying Declaration Cannot Hang a Man: Calcutta High Court Sets Aside Murder Conviction IQ of 65, Memory Loss, Frontal Lobe Damage: Supreme Court Holds Brain-Injured Manager Suffered 100% Functional Disability, Enhances Compensation to ₹97.73 Lakh Cannot Be Forced to Pay Gratuity to Retired Employees Who Refuse to Vacate Company Quarters: Supreme Court Victim Who Incited Riot Inside Court Cannot Blame Accused for Trial Delay: Supreme Court Grants Bail in Section 307 Case You Cannot Sell What You Don’t Own: ‘Vendor’s Half Share Means Buyer Gets Only Half’ : Andhra Pradesh High Court Nagaland's Oil Laws Face Constitutional Challenge: Gauhati High Court Sends Union-State Dispute to Supreme Court Order 22 Rule 3 CPC | Will's Validity Cannot Be Decided in Substitution Proceedings: Himachal Pradesh High Court 6-Year-Old Loses Arm To Live 11kV Wire Passing 'Almost Touching' Her Balcony: Punjab & Haryana High Court Awards Rs. 99.93 Lakh To Child Despite Nigam Blaming Father For 'Extending Balcony' Supreme Court Invokes Article 142 To Quash Rape & POCSO Conviction After Marriage Between Accused And Victim NGT Cannot Order Demolition of Temple On Ground of Encroachment of Park: Supreme Court Quashes Removal Order For Want of Jurisdiction Hostile Witnesses & Doubtful Recovery Can Collapse Prosecution: J&K High Court Sets High Threshold for Criminal Proof Compassion Cannot Override the Clock: Karnataka HC Denies Job to Guardian Aunt Despite 2021 Rule Change” Second Marriage During Pendency of Divorce Appeal Is Void: Kerala High Court Appearing in Exam Does Not Cure Attendance Deficiency: MP High Court Upholds 'Year Down' Against BBA Student With Sub-30% Attendance Patna High Court Directs Bihar To Submit Detailed Rehabilitation Plan For Recovered Mental Health Patients, Expand Half-Way Homes Across State Rajasthan High Court Upholds Refusal to Drop Bharat Band Stone-Pelting Case

"Twelve Years of Separation is a Sufficiently Long Period to Have Sapped All Emotions": Supreme Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage

04 September 2024 11:14 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court of India has granted a divorce decree to a couple who have been living separately for 12 years, citing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as the reason. The Court declared, "Twelve years of separation is a sufficiently long period of time to have sapped all emotions," thereby setting aside the earlier decisions of the Family Court and the High Court.

The appellant, Rajib Kumar Roy, and the respondent, Sushmita Saha, have been married since 2007 but started living separately within three years of their marriage. The couple has a 12-year-old daughter who currently resides with her mother.

The Supreme Court observed, "Continued bitterness, dead emotions and long separation, in the given facts and circumstances of a case, can be construed as a case of 'irretrievable breakdown of marriage,' which is also a facet of 'cruelty'." The Court further noted that keeping the parties together under these circumstances would amount to cruelty on both sides.

In addition to the divorce decree, the Court also directed the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,00,000 in the account of the respondent for the education of their daughter. The appellant will continue to pay Rs. 15,000 per month as maintenance and will have visitation rights towards his daughter.

The judgement has been hailed as a significant step in recognizing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as a valid ground for divorce, thereby providing a legal pathway for couples who have been living separately for extended periods.

Supreme Court concluded by stating, "We hereby grant a decree of divorce on account of irretrievable breakdown of marriage," thereby disposing of the appeal and setting aside the High Court's earlier decision.

Date of Decision: 21-08-2023

RAJIB KUMAR ROY vs SUSHMITA SAHA

Latest Legal News