Motor Insurance Policy Covers Cross-Border Travel If Specifically Authorized By Valid Permit Under MVA: Supreme Court Petrol Pumps Act As 'Commission Agents' For Mahanagar Gas, Liable To Pay Service Tax Under Business Auxiliary Service: Supreme Court Supreme Court Refuses To Dilute 'Bangalore Water Supply' Ratio, Affirms Worker Protection Remains The Core Of Industrial Disputes Act Order XXII Rule 9(3) CPC | Application Under Section 5 Limitation Act Must Be Filed Separately To Condonate Delay In Setting Aside Abatement: Supreme Court Principle Of Parity | Supreme Court Extends Benefit Of Fixed-Term Sentence To Co-Accused Based On Remission Period Right To Catch Fish Amounts To 'Profit à Prendre' And Is Compulsorily Registrable As A Lease Under Section 17(1)(d) Registration Act: Supreme Court Supreme Court Mandates Adoption Of Guidelines To Inculcate Sensitivity And Compassion In Judicial Processes For Sexual Offences 'Last Seen' Circumstance Is Weak Without Corroboration: Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused PSEB | Pre-Regularization Service Must Be Counted As Qualifying Service For Pensionary Benefits: Supreme Court Writ Of Quo Warranto Cannot Be Used For Redress Of Personal Grievances By Unsuccessful Candidates In Selection Process: Supreme Court 'Case Of No Investigation': Supreme Court Acquits Murder Accused Citing 'Shoddy' Police Work And Lack Of Forensic Evidence 'Status Quo Cannot Be Vacated Without Appropriate Security': Supreme Court Directs Additional ₹200 Crores Deposit In RAKIA-Matrix Case SARFAESI Act | 'Bank' As Assignee Can Invoke Recovery Measures Even If Debt Was Originally Created By Non-Notified Financial Institution: Supreme Court 'CBI Failed Miserably': Supreme Court Tears Into 'Fabricated' Case, Acquits Bank Manager In 35-Year-Old Corruption Trial Mere Delay In Tax Deposit Cannot Be Equated With Non-Payment: Supreme Court Quashes Penalty On Saudi Arabian Airlines Revisional Power Under Section 56 Karnataka Land Revenue Act Cannot Be Invoked Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period: Supreme Court Prosecution Can’t Use Known Locations To Create 'Discovery' Fiction: Supreme Court Rejects Site Plan As Evidence Irretrievable Breakdown Of Marriage And Long-Term Separation Constitute Valid Grounds For Divorce Under Section 13(1)(ib) HMA: Supreme Court 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Is A Guideline And Not A Fetish': Supreme Court Acquits Man In 2007 Murder Case Over Fragile Circumstantial Evidence Plea Of Juvenility Is A Jurisdictional Fact; High Court Must Recall Final Judgments Under Section 482 CrPC To Remedy Miscarriage Of Justice: Supreme Court SEBI | Professional Clearing Members Have No Statutory Obligation To Verify Credit/Debit Positions Of Individual Clients Of Trading Members: Supreme Court

"Twelve Years of Separation is a Sufficiently Long Period to Have Sapped All Emotions": Supreme Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage

04 September 2024 11:14 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court of India has granted a divorce decree to a couple who have been living separately for 12 years, citing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as the reason. The Court declared, "Twelve years of separation is a sufficiently long period of time to have sapped all emotions," thereby setting aside the earlier decisions of the Family Court and the High Court.

The appellant, Rajib Kumar Roy, and the respondent, Sushmita Saha, have been married since 2007 but started living separately within three years of their marriage. The couple has a 12-year-old daughter who currently resides with her mother.

The Supreme Court observed, "Continued bitterness, dead emotions and long separation, in the given facts and circumstances of a case, can be construed as a case of 'irretrievable breakdown of marriage,' which is also a facet of 'cruelty'." The Court further noted that keeping the parties together under these circumstances would amount to cruelty on both sides.

In addition to the divorce decree, the Court also directed the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,00,000 in the account of the respondent for the education of their daughter. The appellant will continue to pay Rs. 15,000 per month as maintenance and will have visitation rights towards his daughter.

The judgement has been hailed as a significant step in recognizing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as a valid ground for divorce, thereby providing a legal pathway for couples who have been living separately for extended periods.

Supreme Court concluded by stating, "We hereby grant a decree of divorce on account of irretrievable breakdown of marriage," thereby disposing of the appeal and setting aside the High Court's earlier decision.

Date of Decision: 21-08-2023

RAJIB KUMAR ROY vs SUSHMITA SAHA

Latest Legal News