Renewal Is Not Extension Unless Terms Are Fixed in Same Deed: Bombay High Court Strikes Down ₹64.75 Lakh Stamp Duty Demand on Nine-Year Lease Fraud Vitiates All Solemn Acts—Appointment Void Ab Initio Even After 27 Years: Allahabad High Court Litigants Cannot Be Penalised For Attending Criminal Proceedings Listed On Same Day: Delhi High Court Restores Civil Suit Dismissed For Default Limited Permissive Use Confers No Right to Expand Trademark Beyond Agreed Territories: Bombay High Court Enforces Consent Decree in ‘New Indian Express’ Trademark Dispute Assam Rifles Not Entitled to Parity with Indian Army Merely Due to Similar Duties: Delhi High Court Dismisses Equal Pay Petition Conspiracy Cannot Be Presumed from Illicit Relationship: Bombay High Court Acquits Wife, Affirms Conviction of Paramour in Murder Case Bail in NDPS Commercial Quantity Cases Cannot Be Granted Without Satisfying Twin Conditions of Section 37: Delhi High Court Cancels Bail Orders Terming Them ‘Perversely Illegal’ Article 21 Rights Not Absolute In Cases Threatening National Security: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Granted In Jnaneshwari Express Derailment Case A Computer Programme That Solves a Technical Problem Is Not Barred Under Section 3(k): Madras High Court Allows Patent for Software-Based Data Lineage System Premature Auction Without 30-Day Redemption Violates Section 176 and Bank’s Own Terms: Orissa High Court Quashes Canara Bank’s Gold Loan Sale Courts Can’t Stall Climate-Resilient Public Projects: Madras High Court Lifts Status Quo on Eco Park, Pond Works at Race Club Land No Cross-Examination, No Conviction: Gujarat High Court Quashes Customs Penalty for Violating Principles of Natural Justice ITAT Was Wrong in Disregarding Statements Under Oath, But Additions Unsustainable Without Corroborative Evidence: Madras High Court Deduction Theory Under Old Land Acquisition Law Has No Place Under 2013 Act: Punjab & Haryana High Court Enhances Compensation for Metro Land Acquisition UIT Cannot Turn Around After Issuing Pattas, It's Estopped Now: Rajasthan High Court Private Doctor’s Widow Eligible for COVID Insurance if Duty Proven: Supreme Court Rebukes Narrow Interpretation of COVID-Era Orders Smaller Benches Cannot Override Constitution Bench Authority Under The Guise Of Clarification: Supreme Court Criticises Judicial Indiscipline Public Premises Act, 1971 | PP Act Overrides State Rent Control Laws for All Tenancies; Suhas Pophale Overruled: Supreme Court Court Has No Power To Reduce Sentence Below Statutory Minimum Under NDPS Act: Supreme Court Denies Relief To Young Mother Convicted With 23.5 kg Ganja Non-Compliance With Section 52-A Is Not Per Se Fatal: Supreme Court Clarifies Law On Sampling Procedure Under NDPS Act MBA Degree Doesn’t Feed the Stomach: Delhi High Court Says Wife’s Qualification No Ground to Deny Maintenance

"Twelve Years of Separation is a Sufficiently Long Period to Have Sapped All Emotions": Supreme Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage

04 September 2024 11:14 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court of India has granted a divorce decree to a couple who have been living separately for 12 years, citing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as the reason. The Court declared, "Twelve years of separation is a sufficiently long period of time to have sapped all emotions," thereby setting aside the earlier decisions of the Family Court and the High Court.

The appellant, Rajib Kumar Roy, and the respondent, Sushmita Saha, have been married since 2007 but started living separately within three years of their marriage. The couple has a 12-year-old daughter who currently resides with her mother.

The Supreme Court observed, "Continued bitterness, dead emotions and long separation, in the given facts and circumstances of a case, can be construed as a case of 'irretrievable breakdown of marriage,' which is also a facet of 'cruelty'." The Court further noted that keeping the parties together under these circumstances would amount to cruelty on both sides.

In addition to the divorce decree, the Court also directed the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,00,000 in the account of the respondent for the education of their daughter. The appellant will continue to pay Rs. 15,000 per month as maintenance and will have visitation rights towards his daughter.

The judgement has been hailed as a significant step in recognizing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as a valid ground for divorce, thereby providing a legal pathway for couples who have been living separately for extended periods.

Supreme Court concluded by stating, "We hereby grant a decree of divorce on account of irretrievable breakdown of marriage," thereby disposing of the appeal and setting aside the High Court's earlier decision.

Date of Decision: 21-08-2023

RAJIB KUMAR ROY vs SUSHMITA SAHA

Latest Legal News