Supreme Court Lays Down Comprehensive Guidelines To Prevent Misuse Of POCSO Act In Matrimonial Disputes Land Reforms Act | Joint Application For Pre-Emption By Adjoining Landowners Is Maintainable: Calcutta High Court Ocular Evidence In Conflict With Medical Findings Or Withholding Of Natural Witnesses Vitiates Prosecution Case: Allahabad High Court Compassionate Appointment Claim Must Be Decided Based On Policy Prevalent At Time Of Death: Bombay High Court Section 376 IPC | Failure To Prove Initial Dishonest Intent In Marriage Promise Renders Sexual Relationship Consensual: Allahabad High Court Prolonged Incarceration And Delay In Trial Are Valid Grounds To Invoke Constitutional Right To Speedy Trial Under Article 21 In UAPA Cases: Delhi High Court Motor Vehicles Act | Insurer Liable To Pay And Recover Compensation For Gratuitous Passengers In Goods Vehicles: Gujarat High Court Proof Of Demand And Acceptance Under PC Act Must Be Evaluated Based On Preponderance Of Probabilities In Rebuttal: Kerala High Court Tenancy Claim | Mere Possession Without Lawful Foundation Or Identification Of Tenanted Land Cannot Confer Occupancy Rights: Karnataka High Court 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Evaded By Claiming Physical Disability If Conduct Indicates Concealment Of Financial Means: Kerala High Court M.P. Municipal Corporation Act | Locus Standi Under Section 307(5) Limited To Residents Of The Municipal Area: Madhya Pradesh High Court Writ Jurisdiction | Belated Challenge To Disciplinary Action After Superannuation Amounts To Laches; Petition Dismissed: Punjab & Haryana High Court Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC | Mere Pendency Of Partition Suit Does Not Entitle Plaintiff To Injunction Restraining Reconstruction Of Residential Building: Kerala High Court Not A Mere Breach Of Contract: Telangana High Court Refuses To Quash FIR In ₹73 Crore Garment Investment Fraud Section 482 CrPC | High Court Quashes FIR Following Private Compromise In Non-Heinous Dispute Arising From Civil Conflict Mere Involvement In Criminal Case Does Not Constitute Moral Turpitude To Deny Public Appointment: Telangana High Court Pendency Of Investigation Cannot Be A Blanket Ground To Deny Permission For Foreign Travel: Rajasthan High Court Fraudulent Representation By Counsel Vitiates Ex Parte Decree: Punjab & Haryana High Court Holds Professional Misconduct As Evidence Of Fraud Writ Jurisdiction | Suppression Of Material Facts Regarding Pending Criminal And Departmental Proceedings Renders Petition Liable To Dismissal: Orissa High Court Banking Fraud | Failure Of Bank Official To Conduct Physical Inspection Of Collateral Property Constitutes Criminal Conspiracy And Abuse Of Official Position: Madras High Court Fraud Vitiates Judicial Proceedings: Judgment Obtained Through Misrepresentation And Conflict Of Interest Cannot Be Sustained, Holds Punjab And Haryana High Court Discovery Under Section 27 Evidence Act From Publicly Accessible Place Requires Caution: Supreme Court Mere Recovery Of Articles At Instance Of Accused Without Independent Corroboration Cannot Sustain Conviction: Supreme Court DNA Profile Must Be Supported By Other Conclusive Evidence To Prove Guilt: Supreme Court

"Twelve Years of Separation is a Sufficiently Long Period to Have Sapped All Emotions": Supreme Court Grants Divorce on Grounds of Irretrievable Breakdown of Marriage

04 September 2024 11:14 AM

By: Admin


In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court of India has granted a divorce decree to a couple who have been living separately for 12 years, citing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as the reason. The Court declared, "Twelve years of separation is a sufficiently long period of time to have sapped all emotions," thereby setting aside the earlier decisions of the Family Court and the High Court.

The appellant, Rajib Kumar Roy, and the respondent, Sushmita Saha, have been married since 2007 but started living separately within three years of their marriage. The couple has a 12-year-old daughter who currently resides with her mother.

The Supreme Court observed, "Continued bitterness, dead emotions and long separation, in the given facts and circumstances of a case, can be construed as a case of 'irretrievable breakdown of marriage,' which is also a facet of 'cruelty'." The Court further noted that keeping the parties together under these circumstances would amount to cruelty on both sides.

In addition to the divorce decree, the Court also directed the appellant to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,00,000 in the account of the respondent for the education of their daughter. The appellant will continue to pay Rs. 15,000 per month as maintenance and will have visitation rights towards his daughter.

The judgement has been hailed as a significant step in recognizing "irretrievable breakdown of marriage" as a valid ground for divorce, thereby providing a legal pathway for couples who have been living separately for extended periods.

Supreme Court concluded by stating, "We hereby grant a decree of divorce on account of irretrievable breakdown of marriage," thereby disposing of the appeal and setting aside the High Court's earlier decision.

Date of Decision: 21-08-2023

RAJIB KUMAR ROY vs SUSHMITA SAHA

Latest Legal News