Limitation | Delay Condonation Cannot Be An Act Of Generosity: Supreme Court Refuses To Condone 31-Year Delay To Challenge Decree Sentence Suspension In Murder Cases Only Under Exceptional Circumstances; Presumption Of Innocence Erased Upon Conviction: Supreme Court Inquiry Commission Report Cannot Be Used For Disciplinary Action If Statutory Right To Cross-Examine Denied: Gauhati High Court Use Of Trademark On Website Accessible In India Constitutes Domestic Use, Geo-Blocking Mandatory For Territorial Restrictions: Delhi High Court Civil Court Jurisdiction To Interfere With DRT Proceedings Is Absolutely Barred Even For Third Parties: Madras High Court Adding a Prefix Can’t Erase Deceptive Similarity – Delhi High Court Orders Removal of ‘ARUN’ from Trademark ‘AiC ARUN’ Cannot Resile From Mediated Settlement After Taking Benefits: Supreme Court Quashes Wife's DV Case, Grants Divorce Absolute Indemnity Obligation Triggers Immediately Upon Court-Directed Deposit, Not On Final Appeal: Supreme Court Magistrate Directing Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC Only Requires Prima Facie Satisfaction Of Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court Cancellation Of Sale Deed Under Specific Relief Act Not A Pre-Condition To Initiate Criminal Case For Forgery: Supreme Court Amalgamated Company Cannot Claim Set-Off Of Predecessor's Losses Under Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act Without Specific Statutory Provision: Supreme Court Overlapping Split Chargesheets May Raise Double Jeopardy Concerns, Supreme Court Notes While Granting Bail To Former Jharkhand Minister Supreme Court Grants Bail To Convicted Ex-Jharkhand Minister Facing Overlapping Prosecutions From Split Chargesheets Electricity Act Appellate Authority Is A Quasi-Judicial Body Subject To High Court’s Supervisory Jurisdiction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Mere Discrepancy In Date Of Birth Across Certificates Doesn't Amount To Fraud If No Undue Advantage Is Derived: Allahabad High Court Interest Earned On Funds Temporarily Parked Pending Project Deployment Cannot Be Taxed As 'Income From Other Sources': Delhi High Court Reference Court Cannot Set Aside Collector's Award Or Remand Matter For Fresh Determination: Allahabad High Court Administrative Transfer Causing Revenue Loss Defies Court Process: Calcutta High Court Strikes Down Ferry Ghat Handover Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court

Testimonies of Eye-Witnesses, When Unscathed By Cross-Examination, Necessitate Upholding Convictions" - Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Life Sentence in Gang Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a definitive judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the life sentences of two men convicted for their roles in a deadly gang-related attack in Ludhiana, dismissing their appeals against the conviction handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge in October 2022.

The appellants, Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh @ Gogi, faced charges under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), relating to rioting armed with deadly weapons and murder committed by an unlawful assembly, respectively.

The incident, which occurred on June 10, 2012, near Jalandhar Bye-pass, Ludhiana, involved a fatal assault using firearms and baseball bats, rooted in prior altercations among the involved parties. The trial culminated in the appellants being sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment for murder and one year for rioting.

The judgment outlined a meticulous assessment of the evidence, particularly highlighting the reliability of eyewitness testimonies which placed the appellants at the crime scene armed and participating actively in the murder.

Eyewitness Reliability: The court emphasized the consistency and credibility of eyewitness accounts, noting, "Their testifications, unscathed by the ordeal of cross-examination, squarely attribute the crime to the appellants."

Forensic and Medical Corroboration: Autopsy findings corroborated the eyewitness accounts, establishing the cause of death as firearm injuries, aligning with the prosecution's narrative.

Motive and Participation: The bench rejected the defense's assertions on the absence of a direct motive for the appellants, pointing out that their presence at the crime scene and the actions described by witnesses indicated a clear intent to commit murder.

Conclusion of the Judgment: The High Court found no merit in the appeals, stating that the cross-examination failed to discredit the established accusations. It underscored the strength of eyewitness testimonies in the face of rigorous legal scrutiny, thereby affirming the lower court's decision.

Decision Date: April 29, 2024,

Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh vs. State of Punjab,

Latest Legal News