Government Can Resume Leased Land For Public Purpose; 'Substantial Compliance' Of 60-Day Notice Sufficient: Kerala High Court Revenue Can't Cite Pending Litigation to Justify One Year of Adjudication Inaction: Karnataka High Court Limitation | 1,142 Days of Silence: Orissa High Court Rejects Litigant's Claim That His Lawyer Never Called SC/ST Act's Bar on Anticipatory Bail Does Not Apply When Complaint Fails to Make Out Prima Facie Case: Karnataka High Court Oral Agreement for Sale Cannot Be Dismissed for Want of Stamp or Registration: Calcutta High Court Upholds Injunction Finance Company's Own Legal Manager Cannot Appoint Arbitrator — Award Passed by Such Arbitrator Is Non-Est and Inexecutable: Andhra Pradesh High Court District Court Cannot Remand Charity Commissioner's Order: Bombay High Court Division Bench Settles Conflicting Views Framing "Points For Determination" Not Always Mandatory For First Appellate Courts: Allahabad High Court Delhi HC Finds Rape Conviction Cannot Stand On Testimony Where Victim Showed 'Unnatural Concern' For Her Alleged Attacker Limitation in Partition Suit Cannot Be Decided Without Evidence: Karnataka High Court Cheque Dishonour Accused Can Probabilise Defence Without Entering Witness Box — Through Cross-Examination And Marked Documents Alone: Madras High Court Contributory Negligence | No Driving Licence and Three on a Motorcycle Cannot Mean the Victim Caused the Accident: Rajasthan High Court LL.B Degree Cannot Be Ground to Deny Maintenance to Divorced Wife: Gujarat High Court Dried Leaves and Branches Are Not 'Ganja': Delhi High Court Grants Bail Under NDPS Act Family Court Judge Secretly Compared Handwriting Without Telling Wife, Then Punished Her Hesitation: Delhi High Court Quashes Divorce Decree Co-Owner Can Sell Undivided Share in Joint Property Without Consent of Other Co-owners — Sale Deed Valid to Extent of Transferor's Share: Orissa High Court Mandatory Safeguards of Section 42 NDPS Cannot Be Bypassed — Even When 1329 Kg of Hashish Is Seized: Gujarat High Court Affirms Acquittal GST Officer Froze Business Accounts Without Any Legal Basis, Ignored Taxpayer for Three Months: Bombay High Court Imposes Personal Costs Weapon Recovered, But No Forensic Report, No Independent Witness — Allahabad High Court Acquits Murder Accused

Testimonies of Eye-Witnesses, When Unscathed By Cross-Examination, Necessitate Upholding Convictions" - Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Life Sentence in Gang Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a definitive judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the life sentences of two men convicted for their roles in a deadly gang-related attack in Ludhiana, dismissing their appeals against the conviction handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge in October 2022.

The appellants, Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh @ Gogi, faced charges under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), relating to rioting armed with deadly weapons and murder committed by an unlawful assembly, respectively.

The incident, which occurred on June 10, 2012, near Jalandhar Bye-pass, Ludhiana, involved a fatal assault using firearms and baseball bats, rooted in prior altercations among the involved parties. The trial culminated in the appellants being sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment for murder and one year for rioting.

The judgment outlined a meticulous assessment of the evidence, particularly highlighting the reliability of eyewitness testimonies which placed the appellants at the crime scene armed and participating actively in the murder.

Eyewitness Reliability: The court emphasized the consistency and credibility of eyewitness accounts, noting, "Their testifications, unscathed by the ordeal of cross-examination, squarely attribute the crime to the appellants."

Forensic and Medical Corroboration: Autopsy findings corroborated the eyewitness accounts, establishing the cause of death as firearm injuries, aligning with the prosecution's narrative.

Motive and Participation: The bench rejected the defense's assertions on the absence of a direct motive for the appellants, pointing out that their presence at the crime scene and the actions described by witnesses indicated a clear intent to commit murder.

Conclusion of the Judgment: The High Court found no merit in the appeals, stating that the cross-examination failed to discredit the established accusations. It underscored the strength of eyewitness testimonies in the face of rigorous legal scrutiny, thereby affirming the lower court's decision.

Decision Date: April 29, 2024,

Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh vs. State of Punjab,

Latest Legal News