Trial Courts Must Award Just Compensation In POCSO Cases Beyond Fine Amounts; Interim Payment No Reason To Deny Final Relief: Madras High Court Section 482 CrPC Power Not For Conducting 'Mini-Trial'; Disputed Facts Must Be Adjudicated At Trial: Allahabad High Court Right To Walk On Demarcated Footpaths Is A Fundamental Right; Municipal Authorities Under Enforceable Duty To Provide Pedestrian Infrastructure: Supreme Court Right To Walk Is A Fundamental Right Under Articles 19(1)(d) & 21; Priority Over Motorised Vehicles: Supreme Court Municipal Commissioner Is Disciplinary Authority For All Employees Post-1993 Amendment; Existing Regulations Can't Fetter Statutory Power: Supreme Court High Court Cannot Force Plaintiff To Accept Monetary Compensation Instead Of Removal Of Encroachment Without Prayer: Supreme Court Recruitment Merit Is Not A Vested Right; Public Interest Justifies Disclosing Marks Of Candidates Outside Selection Zone: Supreme Court Special Police Establishment Not An 'Intelligence & Security Organisation', State Cannot Exempt It From RTI Act: Supreme Court Medical Practitioner Not Negligent Merely Because Result Was A Failure If Procedure Adopted Was Acceptable To Medical Science: Calcutta High Court Long Service Cannot Be Denied Regularization On Mere Technicalities If Appointment Wasn't Illegal: Andhra Pradesh High Court Rejection Of Nomination Paper Can Only Be Challenged Through Election Petition; Article 329(b) Bars Writ Jurisdiction: Supreme Court NI Act | Benefit Of Presumptions Under Sections 118 & 139 Not Available If Complainant Lacks Direct Knowledge Of Transaction: Kerala High Court Landowners Entitled To Solatium Under National Highways Act; Failure To Grant Is Ground To Challenge Award Under Section 34: MP High Court Transfer Policy Only Broad Guideline, Not Enforceable Under Article 226/227 In Absence Of Mala Fides: Rajasthan High Court

Testimonies of Eye-Witnesses, When Unscathed By Cross-Examination, Necessitate Upholding Convictions" - Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Life Sentence in Gang Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a definitive judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the life sentences of two men convicted for their roles in a deadly gang-related attack in Ludhiana, dismissing their appeals against the conviction handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge in October 2022.

The appellants, Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh @ Gogi, faced charges under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), relating to rioting armed with deadly weapons and murder committed by an unlawful assembly, respectively.

The incident, which occurred on June 10, 2012, near Jalandhar Bye-pass, Ludhiana, involved a fatal assault using firearms and baseball bats, rooted in prior altercations among the involved parties. The trial culminated in the appellants being sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment for murder and one year for rioting.

The judgment outlined a meticulous assessment of the evidence, particularly highlighting the reliability of eyewitness testimonies which placed the appellants at the crime scene armed and participating actively in the murder.

Eyewitness Reliability: The court emphasized the consistency and credibility of eyewitness accounts, noting, "Their testifications, unscathed by the ordeal of cross-examination, squarely attribute the crime to the appellants."

Forensic and Medical Corroboration: Autopsy findings corroborated the eyewitness accounts, establishing the cause of death as firearm injuries, aligning with the prosecution's narrative.

Motive and Participation: The bench rejected the defense's assertions on the absence of a direct motive for the appellants, pointing out that their presence at the crime scene and the actions described by witnesses indicated a clear intent to commit murder.

Conclusion of the Judgment: The High Court found no merit in the appeals, stating that the cross-examination failed to discredit the established accusations. It underscored the strength of eyewitness testimonies in the face of rigorous legal scrutiny, thereby affirming the lower court's decision.

Decision Date: April 29, 2024,

Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh vs. State of Punjab,

Latest Legal News