Limitation For Executing Partition Decree Not Suspended Till Engrossment; Right To Seek Engrossment Subsists During 12-Year Execution Period: Allahabad HC Unilateral Revocation Of Registered Gift Deed Through Sub-Registrar Is Void, Donor Must Approach Civil Court: Andhra Pradesh High Court Mediation Cannot Be Forced Upon Unwilling Party In Civil Suits; Consent Of Both Sides Essential: Bombay High Court Unmarried Daughter Not Entitled To Freedom Fighter Pension If Gainfully Employed At Time Of Father's Death: Calcutta High Court Section 125 CrPC | Maintenance Cannot Be Denied For Lack Of Formal Divorce From First Marriage: Delhi High Court ONGC Cannot Demand Security From Award Holder After Giving ‘No Objection’ To Withdrawal Of Deposited Amount: Andhra Pradesh High Court Sedative Drugs Like Tramadol Impact Mental Fitness Of Declarant; Bombay High Court Acquits Man Relying On Doubtful Dying Declarations Postal Tracking Report Showing 'Refusal' Not Conclusive Proof Of Service If Denied On Oath: Delhi High Court Encroachments Near Military Installations Pose National Security Threat; Remove Illegal Constructions Within Three Months: Rajasthan High Court Punjab & Haryana High Court Directs State To Decide On Legality Of Charging Fees For Downloading FIRs From 'SAANJH' Portal Wife’s Educational Qualifications No Bar To Seeking Maintenance If Actual Employment Is Not Proven: Orissa High Court Mere Telephonic Contact Without Substance Of Conversation Cannot Establish Criminal Conspiracy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Serious Allegations Like HIV/AIDS Imputations Require Corroboration, Cannot Rest Solely On Unsubstantiated Testimony: Karnataka High Court Family Court Cannot Refuse Mutual Consent Divorce Merely Because Parties Are Living Separately 'Without Valid Reason': Kerala High Court Collective Attempts By Advocates To Overbear Presiding Officer Not Protected Professional Conduct: Madras High Court Dismisses Quash Petitions No Legal Evidence Required To Forward A Person To Trial? Rajasthan HC Slams Police For Implicating Accused In NDPS Case Solely On Co-Accused's Statement Accused Must Be Physically Present In Court To Furnish Bonds Under Section 91 BNSS: Punjab & Haryana High Court

Testimonies of Eye-Witnesses, When Unscathed By Cross-Examination, Necessitate Upholding Convictions" - Punjab and Haryana High Court Upholds Life Sentence in Gang Murder Case

07 May 2024 8:19 AM

By: Admin


In a definitive judgment, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana affirmed the life sentences of two men convicted for their roles in a deadly gang-related attack in Ludhiana, dismissing their appeals against the conviction handed down by the Additional Sessions Judge in October 2022.

The appellants, Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh @ Gogi, faced charges under Sections 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), relating to rioting armed with deadly weapons and murder committed by an unlawful assembly, respectively.

The incident, which occurred on June 10, 2012, near Jalandhar Bye-pass, Ludhiana, involved a fatal assault using firearms and baseball bats, rooted in prior altercations among the involved parties. The trial culminated in the appellants being sentenced to concurrent terms of life imprisonment for murder and one year for rioting.

The judgment outlined a meticulous assessment of the evidence, particularly highlighting the reliability of eyewitness testimonies which placed the appellants at the crime scene armed and participating actively in the murder.

Eyewitness Reliability: The court emphasized the consistency and credibility of eyewitness accounts, noting, "Their testifications, unscathed by the ordeal of cross-examination, squarely attribute the crime to the appellants."

Forensic and Medical Corroboration: Autopsy findings corroborated the eyewitness accounts, establishing the cause of death as firearm injuries, aligning with the prosecution's narrative.

Motive and Participation: The bench rejected the defense's assertions on the absence of a direct motive for the appellants, pointing out that their presence at the crime scene and the actions described by witnesses indicated a clear intent to commit murder.

Conclusion of the Judgment: The High Court found no merit in the appeals, stating that the cross-examination failed to discredit the established accusations. It underscored the strength of eyewitness testimonies in the face of rigorous legal scrutiny, thereby affirming the lower court's decision.

Decision Date: April 29, 2024,

Guriqbal Singh @ Vicky Sekhon and Baljinder Singh vs. State of Punjab,

Latest Legal News