Registration Of FIR Is Mandatory If Information Ex Facie Discloses Commission Of  Cognizable Offence: Supreme Court 'No Res Judicata': Supreme Court Holds Rejection Of Section 156(3) CrPC Plea Is No Bar To Subsequent Registration Of FIR Auto Dealers' Referral Charges From Banks & Insurers Constitute 'Business Auxiliary Service', But No Penalty If Tax Paid Before Show Cause Notice: Supreme Court MACT | Appellate Courts Must Liberally Admit Additional Evidence Under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC To Compute 'Just Compensation': Supreme Court MACT | Post-Accident Vehicle Position On Sketch Cannot Be Sole Basis To Infer Contributory Negligence: Supreme Court Enhances Compensation To ₹50.8 Lakhs 'Sanction Under Section 19(1)(c) PC Act Must Be Granted By Removing Authority': Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction Mere Recovery Of Money Cannot Resurrect Prosecution Proof Of Demand Is Sine Qua: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Awards Without Signatures Of All Rival Claimants Are Invalid, Order I Rule 8 CPC Inapplicable: Supreme Court Lok Adalat Cannot Decide Title Disputes, Mere Physical Possession Doesn't Prove Ownership": Supreme Court Quashes Land Acquisition Awards Power Discoms Can't Escape Liability: Andhra Pradesh High Court Upholds Damages For Death Caused By Snapped Live Wires Lying On Ground Extra-Judicial Confessions To Village Administrative Officers Cannot Be Accepted As Gospel Truth Without Signatures And Corroboration: Madras High Court Acquits Murder Accused 'Article 21 Trumps UAPA Rigors': Allahabad High Court Grants Bail To PFI Members After 5 Years In Jail Due To 'Sluggish' Trial" Daughters Cannot Be Denied Equal Share: Orissa High Court Upholds Compensation Apportionment In Favor Of Daughters Under Hindu Succession Act Cannot Reopen Closed Chapter Years Later: Calcutta High Court Dismisses BSF Ex-Head Constable's Plea Claiming Voluntary Retirement Was Extracted Under Coercion Long-Standing Relationship And Public Recognition Prove Valid Marriage: Karnataka High Court Upholds Second Wife's Right To 1/3rd Share In Property Collector Becomes Functus Officio Once Duty Is Determined: Punjab & Haryana High Court Quashes Penalty On Stamp Duty Deficiency Eyewitness Testimony Contradicted By Medical Evidence Cannot Sustain Murder Conviction: Madhya Pradesh High Court Acquits Woman In IPC 302 Case

Telangana High Court Directs Authorities to Follow New Land Acquisition Act, Calls Previous Actions Void and Lapsed

05 September 2024 5:48 AM

By: Admin


Telangana High Court Bench comprising C.J. Alok Aradhe and Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar delivered a crucial judgment today in Writ Appeal No.1614 of 2017 involving land acquisition procedures. The case was brought forward by Madanlal Vijay Kumar, the appellant, against the State of Telangana, the respondents.

Justice N.V. Shravan Kumar, delivering the verdict, observed that the "entire proceedings starting from the notification under Section 4(1) of the 1894 Act, which culminated in the award dated 05.02.2015, are void and have lapsed." This comes as a significant ruling affecting how land acquisition would be dealt with moving forward.

The case revolves around the appellant's claim that the land acquisition process was not carried out following the correct procedures, specifically the guidelines established under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, known as Act 30 of 2013. The appellant also argued that the respondent authorities did not pass the award within the two-year window from the initial notification, making the award unsustainable.

Responding to these claims, the court noted that the authorities had failed to conduct "fresh assessment as per Section 4 to 8 of Act 30 of 2013" and further mentioned that "no revision of market rate was undertaken as envisaged under Section 26 of Act 30 of 2013." In a direct quote, the court highlighted that "provisions of Sections 11 to 15, 19 and 20 of the Act 30 of 2013 were not followed."

This judgment is a significant milestone for those fighting for a fair and transparent land acquisition process. Authorities have been directed to revisit and revise the land acquisition proceedings in accordance with the law. As a consequence, the authorities have to strictly follow the guidelines laid down under the Act 30 of 2013 for any ongoing or future land acquisitions.

Legal experts suggest that this ruling is likely to set a precedent and act as a cautionary tale for authorities to meticulously follow the legal framework to avoid future complications.

Date of Decision: 20 October 2023

Madanlal Vijay Kumar VS State of Telangana

Latest Legal News